×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Police Will Not Prosecute Kodansha Over AKB48 Idol Tomomi Kasai's Photo


Goto page 1, 2  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hawkwing



Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Posts: 317
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:41 pm Reply with quote
Good news in my opinion, i don't think it should be considered as child pornography.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swhitey



Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 31
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:54 pm Reply with quote
I'm glad they got dropped. I thought the charges were idiotic in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ScruffyKiwi



Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Posts: 709
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:12 pm Reply with quote
The photo was a bloody stupid idea and was blatant sexualizing of an adolescent. It's a good job that someone took action over this and hopefully people will use their brains more next time!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VORTIA
Subscriber



Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 944
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:44 pm Reply with quote
Dear Law Enforcement,

Child Pornography is illegal because IT HURTS KIDS.

If this actually was "child pornography", why would you ever drop your case just because distribution ceased?

If the kid wasn't hurt, stop being jack-booted thought police and go tackle real crime - like actual child porn!

Sincerely,
Common Sense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger My Anime My Manga
Kutsu



Joined: 23 Apr 2011
Posts: 570
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:56 pm Reply with quote
VORTIA wrote:
Dear Law Enforcement,

Child Pornography is illegal because IT HURTS KIDS.

If this actually was "child pornography", why would you ever drop your case just because distribution ceased?

If the kid wasn't hurt, stop being jack-booted thought police and go tackle real crime - like actual child porn!

Sincerely,
Common Sense


'Common sense is not so common.'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clawfinger



Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Location: Illinois
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:30 pm Reply with quote
This some type of swimsuit mag?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5936
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:52 pm Reply with quote
Guess it is okay to show a 3 year old standing on a chair breast feeding directly (without any feeding cover) on the cover of Time magazine, but it is somehow wrong and illegal in this case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ANN_Lynzee
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 3031
Location: Email for assistance only
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:29 pm Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
Guess it is okay to show a 3 year old standing on a chair breast feeding directly (without any feeding cover) on the cover of Time magazine, but it is somehow wrong and illegal in this case.


Breastfeeding a child and risque photos are not comparable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
EnigmaticSky



Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 750
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:35 pm Reply with quote
Breastfeeding a child and risque photos are not comparable.[/quote]
Mouth covering it = ok
hands covering it = not ok?
If you ask me, I think TarsTarkas makes a good point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CatoriStar



Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 53
Location: Tennessee
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:46 pm Reply with quote
I'm sorry but there is a HUGE difference in breastfeeding a child and photos of breastfeeding a child and a photo that is meant to be sexy and titillating. Breastfeeding a child is not meant to be a sexual act. The photo that got pulled from this magazine was intended to be taken in a sexual way, it was supposed to be taken as a pair of hot boobies. If you still can't understand I don't know what to tell you...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TarsTarkas



Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5936
Location: Virginia, United States
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:12 pm Reply with quote
octopodpie wrote:
Breastfeeding a child and risque photos are not comparable.


If it was a baby being breastfed in the normal way, you would be right. But it wasn't a baby being breastfed, and it wasn't a normal breastfeeding.

It was a staged cover photo, done to be provocative and shocking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
prabb



Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 86
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:16 pm Reply with quote
But was it done to be arousing?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sam Murai



Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 1051
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:39 pm Reply with quote
Good to hear. The bad publicity and the subsequent consequences were enough punishments and Kodansha pulled it altogether. No real need to put public funds into a case that would have been already tough to prosecute on concrete ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
ANN_Lynzee
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 02 May 2011
Posts: 3031
Location: Email for assistance only
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:10 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
octopodpie wrote:
Breastfeeding a child and risque photos are not comparable.


If it was a baby being breastfed in the normal way, you would be right. But it wasn't a baby being breastfed, and it wasn't a normal breastfeeding.

It was a staged cover photo, done to be provocative and shocking.


As far as I remember about the photo in question, it wasn't staged. The woman in the photo was still breastfeeding her toddler outside of the photograph. And you might be surprised to find out that in many countries, extended breastfeeding is not abnormal. Many women wait until a child self-weans, possibly up to five years. Regardless, health organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) recommend breastfeeding up to 2 years old, while the APA recommends at least a year and "as long as is mutually desired by the mother and baby".

And yes, to the previous poster, it's not comparable because a woman breastfeeding her child isn't meant to get anyone off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
enurtsol



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14888
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:15 am Reply with quote
Kutsu wrote:
VORTIA wrote:
Dear Law Enforcement,

Child Pornography is illegal because IT HURTS KIDS.

If this actually was "child pornography", why would you ever drop your case just because distribution ceased?

If the kid wasn't hurt, stop being jack-booted thought police and go tackle real crime - like actual child porn!

Sincerely,
Common Sense


'Common sense is not so common.'


When a child isn't hurt because he/she doesn't know about it any better, so it's not child pr0n then..............? Very Happy

Anyways, the bad PR and costly recall are punishment enough. The state needn't waste any more resources on this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group