View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
kireblue
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 22
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:08 pm
|
|
|
I've been waiting for this for so long.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jessica Hart
Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 219
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:31 pm
|
|
|
Nothing will replace my Basalt Horogium
Unless it's an RC Basalt Horogium
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jaymie
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 915
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:32 pm
|
|
|
When I was a kid we pulled on a cord to watch Beyblades spin in random directions for about fifteen seconds.
|
Back to top |
|
|
WeirDiE_InC
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 418
Location: The GVRD
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:38 pm
|
|
|
Surprised that they didn't come up with these sooner.
Although now it feels as though you can throw any physical skill possibly involved with beyblading completely out the window.
|
Back to top |
|
|
cohenmarioman
Joined: 02 May 2010
Posts: 102
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:51 pm
|
|
|
To be honest, only now is it a game worth playing. Before it was pretty much just dumb luck with a few additives to your favor, but now you can actually do something. I like it.
Thing is, exactly how would backwards compatibility work? Beyblade has no backwards compatibility of metal to its plastic counterparts, and none with the metal to the remote metal/plastic.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Emerje
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 7413
Location: Maine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:51 pm
|
|
|
WeirDiE_InC wrote: | Surprised that they didn't come up with these sooner. |
I'm sure they did, this is probably just an example of waiting for the technology to catch up with the concept in a way that's affordable for kids.
(BTW, why does the image credit "Tomy" when the article has the proper "Takara Tomy"? Tomy wasn't even the original creator, Takara was. I know Tomy technically refers to the company in English, but even then Hasbro has the US rights.)
Emerje
|
Back to top |
|
|
WeirDiE_InC
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 418
Location: The GVRD
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:11 pm
|
|
|
Emerje wrote: | (BTW, why does the image credit "Tomy" when the article has the proper "Takara Tomy"? Tomy wasn't even the original creator, Takara was. I know Tomy technically refers to the company in English, but even then Hasbro has the US rights.) |
Tomy was the bigger part of the company, or it was the one that was the more recognizable brand internationally.
|
Back to top |
|
|
CannedJam
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Posts: 41
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:26 pm
|
|
|
Gah! 9-10 years ago I wasn't an 18 year-old thinking about school. I wish we had these right off the bat lol. Then the schoolyard battles would have been decided by skill
|
Back to top |
|
|
The King of Harts
Joined: 05 May 2009
Posts: 6712
Location: Mount Crawford, Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:32 pm
|
|
|
Call me when they find a way to put a dragon in them.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Emerje
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 7413
Location: Maine
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:38 pm
|
|
|
WeirDiE_InC wrote: |
Emerje wrote: | (BTW, why does the image credit "Tomy" when the article has the proper "Takara Tomy"? Tomy wasn't even the original creator, Takara was. I know Tomy technically refers to the company in English, but even then Hasbro has the US rights.) |
Tomy was the bigger part of the company, or it was the one that was the more recognizable brand internationally. |
Yeah, I know, I even pointed it out in the post. The question was why they used one version in one place and the other in the other place. Seems like Tomy should only be used alone when talking about a product they release here. Since this is about a product being sold in Japan and Hasbro has the US license it seems like the image should be credited to Takara Tomy. I'm just curious if my reasoning was wrong, I wasn't trying to make a correction.
Emerje
|
Back to top |
|
|
Primus
Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 2820
Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:23 pm
|
|
|
WeirDiE_InC wrote: | Surprised that they didn't come up with these sooner. |
They did back in 2003:
They didn't work very well.
Though Hasbro appears to be launching a line of Remote Control Metal Fight/Metal Fusion Beyblades this fall (announced at Toyfair way back when):
cohenmarioman wrote: | To be honest, only now is it a game worth playing. Before it was pretty much just dumb luck with a few additives to your favor, but now you can actually do something. I like it.
Thing is, exactly how would backwards compatibility work? Beyblade has no backwards compatibility of metal to its plastic counterparts, and none with the metal to the remote metal/plastic. |
The game never really was about luck. It was always about customization skill, and launching technique. People brush off the game's competitive aspect, but it does have a very well defined community of those who care about making a deep game. There is luck in the game, but it's just a bit more than a trading card game, where you need to draw the right cards. There's a tonne you can do beforehand to put yourself at an advantage.
As for compatibility, these tops, I wouldn't hold my breathe for more than compatibility with just tips, and maybe the Clear Wheels, and Wheel.
This is a gimmick line that I doubt will ever replace the shooter based line.
|
Back to top |
|
|
enurtsol
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14889
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:44 pm
|
|
|
Kids have lost the skill to spin a top themselves - without any machination!
My ol' wooden top with concrete nail spun around a rope would break these plastic ones!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Banken
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 1281
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:58 am
|
|
|
It's still a retarded anime about playing with tops designed to sell toys to the only people who really get into things like this... 10 year-olds.
Actually, that's an insult to 10 year-olds. Where I come from ten year-olds play baseball.
|
Back to top |
|
|
cohenmarioman
Joined: 02 May 2010
Posts: 102
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:24 am
|
|
|
Hold up there dude, trading cards obviously aren;t all luck either then. They involve tons of customization in the deck and synergy, as well as the important aspects of repeatability to pull of the winning combos.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Primus
Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 2820
Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:30 am
|
|
|
cohenmarioman wrote: | Hold up there dude, trading cards obviously aren;t all luck either then. They involve tons of customization in the deck and synergy, as well as the important aspects of repeatability to pull of the winning combos. |
I never said that. I mentioned that there's only a bit more luck than that required in a card game. I just took issue with the idea that Beyblade never had a competitive angle until some silly gimmick tops emerged, because that's not right. Heck, from what it looks like, the normal line appears to have more competitiveness thanks to customization.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|