Forum - View topicShelf Life - Fists of Fury
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pparker
Posts: 1185 Location: Florida |
|
|||||||
Knowing that is why I was surprised at your vehemence regarding HiMM. If some others at ANN had written your review, I wouldn't have given it a second thought. I see now why HiMM in particular produced that reaction.
This is where my bs meter sort of flicks. Every sector of entertainment panders to its audience. That's the producer's job, even altering the artist's work in order to broaden the market or increase chances of financial success. So criticizing this particular sector for doing that seems disingenuous. That's why I end up discussing cultural sensibilities, because I don't see pandering as a valid issue.
LOL. Precisely my point. It's the culture, not the content. Works of art don't cause specific reactions in people, the people cause their own reactions, evidenced by the infinitely broad human responses to the same work. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2212180.stm). No need to even wonder about the Middle East reaction... |
||||||||
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor
Posts: 3904 Location: CO |
|
|||||||
I don't think there's anything wrong with pandering. I may like a show less because of it, but I have nothing against the principle of it. Everyone panders. I simply said that the Japanese pandered to their older otaku audience, which is why you can't just say, "Yes, but all the characters are 14!" Because while all the characters are 14, the creators know that many of the viewers are much older. And although you think that a viewer has no part in a creative work, I am arguing that viewers are definitely an integral part in any show or movie, and pandering is surely one of the signs. Also, if you wanted to argue film theory, we could go back to one of our earlier interchanges where we argued over whether viewers were "part" of a work or not. The difference, in my mind, between a movie viewer and a Broadway viewer is that when you're watching a movie on the big screen, you are effectively in the scene. You are watching the events unfold in front of you, and you are transported into the movie. With a play, there is no chance of being transported into it, because you are watching live actors recount a tale on a stage in front of you. If one of them coughs, you are suddenly reminded that you are not part of the production. FYI, Malaysia is not in the Middle East. ; ) |
||||||||
Ralifar
Posts: 205 Location: League City, TX |
|
|||||||
I'm going to disagree with you on that Bamboo. I think that depends on the quality of the actors involved in the play. I've been to many plays where the actors have managed to wrap me up in the story thoroughly throughout the entire performance. And I may be mistaken on this, but I think pparker was just making a reference that the Middle-East reaction would be even worse than Malaysia's. Maybe not though. I think many Middle-East review boards work this way. "It has Western ideas in it?" REJECTED! "It has Eastern ideas in it?" REJECTED! *edit* I didn't change anything. I just noticed I failed to capitalize something that should have been capitalized. Last edited by Ralifar on Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||
Dorcas_Aurelia
Posts: 5344 Location: Philly |
|
|||||||
Yeah, you guys stopped discussing the article a while ago and are now working on whether or not your responses and behavior are appropriate. It's distracting from people who are trying to talk about the shows. |
||||||||
pparker
Posts: 1185 Location: Florida |
|
|||||||
But we started this talking not about the Japanese audience reaction, but your own and other opinions in the thread. My objection was to lumping HiMM in with every other pantsu otaku show, because I saw it in a different way, that's all. And taken as simply an artistic work of gag comedy, that age range and its consistency are a primary element to its humor. I still say it's Western-influenced attitudes that make it difficult in the U.S. to judge the show on its merits as a Japanese production--but I also fully acknowledge that every element of the show contributes to its "merit" in the eyes of the viewer, so any opinion is valid.
Okay, let me revise that to "no active participation in the physical and mental act of creation of a work of art". The concept of a viewer, an audience, holds a place in the creative process usually, but the viewer themselves do not play an active role. Pandering fits fine with that. But again, we are back to individual perceptions and culture. Beyond your personal reactions to the quality of the show, the only other intention behind decrying otaku pandering specifically is because it invokes the taboo of "old men and young girls", or any age differential considered inappropriate in relation to sexual attitudes or activities. I heartily agree that in our modern societies actual physical sexual activity conducted with a child is abhorrent. Not from a moral standpoint, but a societal one. In earlier societies, the age of majority was 14, or even less, and it was not negative under the existing circumstances of survival and propogation of the society. As were relationships between people widely disparate in age. But the consequences of such action in our modern societies can be considered negative by default (though there are no absolutes), and we have laws to prevent or punish that activity for the average, overall good of society and its members. This also leads logically to the concept that works of art induce people to commit physical acts, which is entirely unfounded by any statistical evidence I've seen, and I have looked for it. That is regardless of anyone's opinion on it, learned or otherwise. In fact, statistics point to the opposite conclusion. So someone chooses to sit in their room and masturbate to pictures? Meh, who cares? We'd like to see better behavior from that person maybe, but removing their pictures and suppressing the artists and an industry isn't the answer to that problem. Because the art is NOT the cause of the behavior. People themselves, and only themselves even if by passive agreement, cause their own behavior. Each and every moment of it.
Which I don't mind, though I'm probably at a disadvantage . Anyway... I understand and agree with that technical principle of film vs. stage. But it's not black and white. Theater in the round? Breaking the fourth wall in film? And you are still a viewer, and at the effect point of the creator's causative action, not a "participant" unless physical audience participation is part of the production (beginning with applause as the first step). Your actual participation in film is an illusion. The creator's consideration of you as audience in their thinking does not add you to the work. Creators play with that principle fairly often outside standard genre fare. In any case, I think we are arguing two different points here. That all started with the "character" misunderstanding, and is covered in my "participation" clarification above. No matter what, the physical act of viewing a film provides no direct connection to the creative process, unless you are prepared to cancel physics as we know it. And yes, this:
|
||||||||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24250 |
|
|||||||
Well, without referencing any of the exchanges between Zac and PJ which are none of my business, my exchanges with Zac have been about the right and wrong way to express criticism about reviewers, which sprung from the column in question. Besides which, this is a written dialogue so it's not like a loud conversation in RL that drowns out other discussion around it. You yourself could have written something about "Shelf Life - Fists of Fury" (like pparker is doing) but chose to engage with the "distraction" instead. Practice what you preach. |
||||||||
DFBTG
Posts: 385 Location: Hell |
|
|||||||
As much as I would just love to see this absolutely lovely discussion go on uninterrupted, I'm curious about a few things:
@Amelia (ReiClone88?) where did you get/come across that last picture (the one in the silver frame)? It is certainly something I wouldn't mind owning, that's for sure. And Ralifar, what branch are you in? I signed my soul (no, I don't have any misgivings) April 1st and joined the USMC and will be going to basic this December myself. As for the column, pretty lackluster batch this time around. |
||||||||
Ralifar
Posts: 205 Location: League City, TX |
|
|||||||
Well, I'm not in anything anymore. I was in the army for seven and a half years. I joined when I was 18. I was stationed at FT Hood, TX for four and a half years. I did two tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan. You want to know what the worst portion of my Military career was? Worse than any of my deployments. It was the year I spent recruiting out of Memorial City Mall in Houston. This was actually why I volunteered to go over to Afghanistan, so I wouldn't have to spend another year doing it.
The military has it's ups and downs. You probably didn't do wrong by yourself by joining. All those deployments did contribute to me being able to amass a large anime collection. I've spent the past year and a half in Afghanistan just working as a civilian contractor. I'm going home next month though to let the Government pay for me to finish up my degree in computer science. I don't care if you think you're in good physical shape or not. You have 2 months to get into better shape. I guarantee it'll make basic training much easier. That's probably the best advice I can give you. Not that you asked for it. |
||||||||
DFBTG
Posts: 385 Location: Hell |
|
|||||||
Hm, sounded like you were still in. No matter. I haven't done anything yet, so definitely hats off to you for your tours. And I can't blame you for hating recruiting. I'm not a recruiter but I can tell that it sucks. What I'm really wondering about is what I'm going to do with all my collection. I'm not saying it's the most expansive thing out there, but I have plenty of anime, books and manga, video games, and models/toys (man, did I love Zoids, Digimon, and Gundam wing back in the day...there's also some BK pokemon toys/gold-plated whatever). I'm fairly certain that I'm not going to get enough room to house all that, especially given that there's going to be at least one other person (possibly two at this point) sharing the same room. Putting them in one of those cases like you did yours would work, but I'd rather not trash the original cases. Yeah, I know. Although I should have been doing this much earlier, a few months ago I did start working out every day (one day lower body, the other upper) and running every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Despite doing so my station's weekly Wednesday PT doesn't seem to get any easier, and my IST has more or less plateaued out a month ago. I thought I pushed myself hard, but maybe not... |
||||||||
Jedi Master
Posts: 400 |
|
|||||||
8 pages and it hasn't been written yet: Bamboo, you kick puppies!
I agree, that framed photographic artwork looks awesome. Homemade, maybe? I'm now inspired to try it with my own figure collection. Can digital cameras even take B/W photos? |
||||||||
fuuma_monou
Posts: 1862 Location: Quezon City, Philippines |
|
|||||||
Not that I know of. Should be easy enough to convert a color picture to B&W in an image editor. |
||||||||
GrilledEelHamatsu
Posts: 703 |
|
|||||||
HIMM reminds me of Aqua Teen Hunger Force. It's inane, has no point or relevancy. It's just a ecchi with very bizzare crude humor that tends to be more absurd then offensive or suggestive. I personally find HIMM to be incredibly stupid then to be disturbing. The idea of young otaku buying skimpy or semi nude bedsheets depicting moe girls to me is taboo. But it's Japanese culture. In Japan sex is viewed 4th dimesionally. They see fictional animated characters whether young,old whatever engaging in sex as fictional, therefore benign. If a young teen buys these bedsheets and wants to jack off on them. That's acceptable to them.(Masturbation is a very common acceptable subject in thier culture and the Japanese have a very liberal view on it) Though there are many Japanese people that could care less about anime, they at least respect it. In America they see sexuality as something that should not be depicted in cartoons yet in almost everything live-action in America is riddled with sexuality. Talk about a double standard! Fictional live action characters are more likely to desensitize people then animated fiction. |
||||||||
dizzon
Posts: 338 |
|
|||||||
If that's how it actually is in Japan, fine. The problem is when people keep trying to compare cultures as if being acceptable in Japan somehow means it should be accepted outside of Japan. What flies there doesn't always fly here and vice versa. Respect of culture is not a one-way street, you can say "That's how they do it in Japan", but remember other people and cultures may not agree. |
||||||||
ReiClone88
Posts: 187 Location: Inside a giant tank full of Tang |
|
|||||||
For my 17th birthday my Aunt ordered a high-resolution poster-size print from him. A few days later after she gave it to me during her visit, we took it to be framed at Michael's. Here's a link to the original picture on his Flickr, but you'll need to be signed in due to the set it's in being labeled 18+: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceaserfineartphotography/2092348666/in/set-72157603391772986/ |
||||||||
sidceaser
Posts: 2 |
|
|||||||
Hi Amelia! Is your aunt Kim Griffin? I remember her picking this up a while back, but didn't know where it was going to end up! Your framing looks perfect with it. I'm happy to have found a picture of it framed. I'm going to reread the last few pages of this thread and contribute if I can. It looks like a good topic, and I'd love to join the discussion. Cheers, Sid Ceaser |
||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group