Forum - View topicEP. REVIEW: Momentary Lily
Goto page Previous 1, 2 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
James_Beckett
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 285 Location: USA |
|
|||
It is because the studio is committed to using every single facet of their creations to sow discord and malfeasance. |
||||
ANN_Lynzee
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 3066 Location: Email for assistance only |
|
|||
If you can explain how it constitutes bullying, I'll take it into consideration when editing reviews in the future. |
||||
flamemasterelan
Posts: 501 |
|
|||
Formatting mistake in this paragraph: you forgot to capitalize the O in the underlined "out" to match up with the other instances of the gag. |
||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||
And the IPA spelling beneath the title is pronounced "weathe"! |
||||
Bleys
Subscriber
Posts: 4 |
|
|||
In fact, GoHands themselves did the "girls in a post-apocalyptic city" scenario more than a decade back with Coppelion. |
||||
motormind
Posts: 93 |
|
|||
Hey, Coppelion was actually decent. Of course, it was based on a pretty good manga with a plot that made sense... most of the time. I could have gone for a second season. As for this article, I think it would behoove Mr. Beckett not to try so hard. Yes, Momentary Lily is kinda dumb, but that's no excuse to try to outmatch it in that regard. Last edited by motormind on Fri Jan 17, 2025 7:24 pm; edited 2 times in total |
||||
Piglet the Grate
Posts: 873 Location: North America |
|
|||
Why is this presented like it is a bad thing? If anything, I am finding the animation rather restrained for a GoHands production. |
||||
ANN_Lynzee
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 3066 Location: Email for assistance only |
|
|||
I'm sorry you don't enjoy this format. It's an ongoing, occasional "bit" that is reserved for very specific productions. If you read James' narrative, three past examples are linked very early on. It's understood by our regular readers that voting for a "cursed" title equals out to these creative exercises by our staff. They are rare; I don't think we even had one last year outside of some extra silliness in Christopher Farris' Nokotan reviews. This one, specifically, has continuity from the last time James did this for The Fruit of Evolution: http://4NN.cx/.180383 The first time I believe this was done was before I was executive editor and it was Gabriella Ekens' reviews of Pop Team Epic. Pop Team Epic: http://4NN.cx/.126735 Pop Team Epic 2: animenewsnetwork.com/review/pop-team-epic-season-2/.190859 (James took up the mantle here, which included another narrative about receiving a cursed box in the mail containing a creepy doll and video tapes) Perhaps best known is Nicholas Dupree's EX-ARM reviews: http://4NN.cx/.168402 and then there are James' other GoHands reviews which include HandShakers (http://4NN.cx/.111039) and W'z (animenewsnetwork.com/review/wz/episodes-1-3/.142326). Not all of these follow the creative meta-format, actually, and it's not dictated that they must. The approach is that if an anime is consistently not good, then the reviews should be at least entertaining to read. Your mileage will vary on that, but 9-ish reviews repeating the same checklist of why something is bad is a horribly dull reviewing assignment to undertake for three months and not particularly useful. The series will probably get a full-series review when it wraps up in the conventional format. If you don't enjoy what will happen in this space every week, I recommend waiting for that. |
||||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24390 |
|
|||
@ ANN_Lynzee: And it is clear from comments in this thread that this format is enthusiastically enjoyed by some. Personally, I find the arrangement contrived and artificial, but then I'm just a big ole spoilsport. I enjoy me a good rant but I like when they occur organically as opposed to the planned, "oh here's a title we all hate, let's vote for it to get it reviewed, have somebody treat it like a pinata and we'll all clap our seal fins together in delight." Bah, humbug.
|
||||
motormind
Posts: 93 |
|
|||
I know what Mr. Beckett is trying to do. It just seems to me that this style of writing is not really his thing. Merely dialing the silliness up to eleven usually does not good comedic writing make. It doesn't help that the article would leave anybody who has not seen the show utterly befuddled. |
||||
ANN_Lynzee
ANN Executive Editor
Posts: 3066 Location: Email for assistance only |
|
|||
I don't want to get in an argument while on vacation, but characterizing the people who feel differently than you because they have a different sense of humor as "clapping [their] seal fins together in delight" actually sucks regardless of whether you couch it in "oh I'm just a spoilsport." Not liking it (whether the show or what was written or both) is fine, characterizing others like that is not.
No, it is. He's being doing it for awhile and a large enough people enjoy it that they vote for him to continue to do it. Again, sorry you didn't enjoy it. |
||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group