Forum - View topicNEWS: Sony Becomes Largest Shareholder in Kadokawa in January
|
Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juno016
 Posts: 2432 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
I am not an economics gal. People were worried about what might happen if Sony aquired Kadokawa, and I get that this is a partnership (possibly to prevent a Korean company from buying too many shares?), so... is this outcome something to celebrate? Dread? Complicated and nuanced? Help me understand, please. DX
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Glordit
 Posts: 683 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
So, Sony technically owns the most shares thus making them the biggest investor.
Kadokawa agreed to the terms, so people can't be mad at Sony. This was also probably done to keep Kadokawa a domestic company. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
Erufailon4
Posts: 202 Location: Finland |
|
|||||||||||||
|
I can already imagine the clickbait thumbnails because people don't understand what "largest shareholder" means. (In this case, it means 10% ownership.) But this is the best case scenario for everyone who (for good or bad reasons) was worried about Kadokawa becoming a subsidiary of Sony.
It's still probably going to be an internal dynamic shift though, especially after such a rough year for Kadokawa. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
Kiwi93
Posts: 403 |
|
|||||||||||||
Yea I get that people don’t like Sony (and for good reasons) but some are acting like Sony forced Kadokawa into this when it seems this is what Kadokawa wanted. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
GATSU
Posts: 15597 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Hope Sony has more success with Kadokawa than they did Kraven.
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
Riku157
Posts: 17 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
So not a 50.1% holder like people were speculating, but just a 10.02% holder. It along with the partnership still matter, but just not as much as people were making it seem.
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
mdo7
 Posts: 6464 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||||||||||
|
My question is: Will this effect ANN overall? Will ANN stay the same, or is Sony going to ask ANN to make some changes (ie: changes in the editorial, or close down ANN forum (I better hope not))?
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
Riku157
Posts: 17 |
|
|||||||||||||
Sony doesn't own Kadokawa. They own 10% of them come January. That would not enable anyone to make changes by themselves. Any changes would require support from other owners too. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
mdo7
Posts: 6464 Location: Katy, Texas, USA |
|
|||||||||||||
I know, but I want to hear that from ANN's editor, Tempest. Even if Sony doesn't own Kadokawa, but that doesn't mean that they made a negotiation behind door regarding what they want to do to Kadokawa's subsidary and other thing. That's why I asked if this will effect ANN in anyway. I want to hear the answer from ANN's editor team before I can breath a sigh of relief. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
#ChewyBike
Posts: 13 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Probably the least worst outcome. No mass layoffs that come with acquisitions and Sony corpos don't have any direct power over the real people at Kadokawa who actually work for a living.
As for what I think of their stated goals
I don't want anything to do with that.
I guess collusion is a step up from monopoly.
Yay, let's take anime away from platforms which translate into Chinese and put it on Crunchyroll instead.
I don't play video games, but that doesn't sound bad.
I don't understand what this means.
It would be nice to have more of Kadokawa's stuff translated, I can read books in english fine.
I'm pretty sure that's what Kadokawa does now. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Joe Mello
 Posts: 2315 Location: Online Terminal |
|
|||||||||||||
I'm guessing you're not going to get an answer for at least a little bit. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Greed1914
 Posts: 4656 |
|
|||||||||||||
Yeah, it's definitely a lot different from the worry that Sony would own/control the company. Looking at the breakdowns of the ownership, and the wording around it, it comes off like Kadokawa was more worried about a different investor, and this sale is meant to address that . Being a 10% shareholder means that Sony can't do much without the other investors being ok with it. I could see some behind the scenes changes that aren't readily identifiable to the rest of us happening, but probably not much beyond that. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group