×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
GAME: Dragon's Crown


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chagen46



Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:37 pm Reply with quote
walw6pK4Alo wrote:
He thinks the designs are disgusting, so do you, and I don't particularly care for them either. What's the point?


If you're talking about the blog...Wundergeek is a woman.

My point was that Tae-Kim is a terrible artist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GarnetStyle



Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 28
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:38 pm Reply with quote
Fencedude5609 wrote:
Uhh...there is a difference between "removing content that exists" and "perhaps not including content to begin with"


Nope, you're still trying to get that content hidden from the product no matter if its pre production or post production. It may have some technical term difference but you're still saying to change a product from what the creator originally wanted. Hey your Avatar offends me because it's about underage girls engauging in sexual activity so I ask that for your posts to be more inclusive towards women and posters everywhere that you refrain from putting things like that in your avatar. Laughing How do you respond to that one?

ikillchicken wrote:
Telling people they shouldn't do something and forcing them not to do it are, obviously, two completely different things.


That just means you lack the power and force to make it happen, which is great.

Quote:
Ultimately this all comes back to one simple truth: All that people are asking is that they be able to enjoy Dragon's Crown as well without having to deal with these insultingly stupid depictions of female characters. And you're saying no. You want boobs and that's way more important than being inclusive to female players. You're being selfish and unreasonable no matter how you choose to dress it up. All your bullshit is nothing but self serving rhetoric to try and hide this bottom line.


Hey, you like Transmetorpolitan? Good, I can't read it because of it's graphic depictions of violence and nudity in it. I'd like to enjoy Transmetropolitan without all the violence and nudity, so I feel it should not have insulting stupid depictions of men and women in those situations. So what do you say? Surely being more inclusive to readers is more important than keeping any of the violence in that comic Laughing You wouldn't want to be self-serving about this because you want the comic to stay the same way it is, do you?

TrailOfDead wrote:
who are the outside forces causing content to be left out of games in this scenario in your head, and by what mechanism do they prevent the content from being in the game?


None and no one, thankfully Laughing It's all just talk but that doesn't change the fact people are seriously saying 'don't include this' 'don't put this in' 'don't make a game with this' That is saying you're fine with censorship. This is when a dev not concerned about professionalism tells those people to go screw themselves if they don't like it. Which I think people like Hideki and Kamitani have plenty of times.


Last edited by GarnetStyle on Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
walw6pK4Alo



Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:39 pm Reply with quote
Chagen46 wrote:
My point was that Tae-Kim is a terrible artist.


Okay, that's an opinion. People dislike a ton of artists I enjoy dearly, but I try not to cry bloody murder about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kakugo



Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 163
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:02 am Reply with quote
Chagen46 wrote:
Seriously?


Yeah, seriously. I think the faces are cute, and I like the ridiculous clothing design - it's unusual, it's colorful and it tends to make me snort without actually trying to. His anatomy's awful, though, no argument there.

I also like Tetsuo Hara and Go Nagai as artists - neither of whom wouldt know how to draw a man's actual basic anatomy if their life depended on it. Doesn't mean I can't find the overall concept and aesthetics of their art interesting enough to overcome their inadequacies at recognizing the basic shape of the human form.

If "anatomy" were a prequisite for liking an artists' work, there's damned few game, manga or anime designers who would qualify.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TrailOfDead



Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Posts: 198
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:19 am Reply with quote
Cecilthedarkknight_234 wrote:
You don't even need a governmental difference anymore to ban something, just a minority that stirs up the pot loud enough to gain local and national media attention. Chagen I like to debate with you didn't grow up in the 80's-90's where there was massive outcry to out right ban violent games "how the esrb was created". Violent or sexual music lyrics that got "parental advisory labels". Please do some research before making statements like this PLEASE!!

http://www.esrb.org/about/chronology.jsp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Music_Resource_Center


the esrb and the riaa warning stickers are industry responses to perceived market forces. you seem to think that the creators of intellectual property and the people who control the means of distributing it are working towards the same goal. this will lead you to many false conclusions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cecilthedarkknight_234



Joined: 02 Apr 2011
Posts: 3820
Location: Louisville, KY
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:31 am Reply with quote
TrailOfDead wrote:
Cecilthedarkknight_234 wrote:
You don't even need a governmental difference anymore to ban something, just a minority that stirs up the pot loud enough to gain local and national media attention. Chagen I like to debate with you didn't grow up in the 80's-90's where there was massive outcry to out right ban violent games "how the esrb was created". Violent or sexual music lyrics that got "parental advisory labels". Please do some research before making statements like this PLEASE!!

http://www.esrb.org/about/chronology.jsp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Music_Resource_Center


the esrb and the riaa warning stickers are industry responses to perceived market forces. you seem to think that the creators of intellectual property and the people who control the means of distributing it are working towards the same goal. this will lead you to many false conclusions


However they where heavy influenced by outcry of concerned parents, religious groups etc. I don't have a problem with self regulation in the media industry. I however do no like them being made by force with fear of governmental bans/pressure from voters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
ikillchicken



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 7272
Location: Vancouver
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:31 am Reply with quote
GarnetStyle wrote:
ikillchicken wrote:
Telling people they shouldn't do something and forcing them not to do it are, obviously, two completely different things.


That just means you lack the power and force to make it happen, which is great.


No it doesn't. It means exactly what I said. You can tell someone they should do something while still respecting their right to not listen. Whether I have the power to force them is irrelevant.

Quote:
Surely being more inclusive to readers is more important than keeping any of the violence in that comic Laughing You wouldn't want to be self-serving about this because you want the comic to stay the same way it is, do you?


Nobody is buying this silly rhetoric. Just stop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
GarnetStyle



Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 28
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:11 am Reply with quote
ikillchicken wrote:
Nobody is buying this silly rhetoric. Just stop.


Your refusal to answer the question says more than an actual answer would. You're quick to cite it on something you disapprove of, but the minute it applies to something you do like, it's a silly rhetoric. Comic books have had a stigma against female readers for the longest time so it makes the comparison all the more fitting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chagen46



Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:33 am Reply with quote
He's not answering you because your question is irrelevant and designed expressly to derail the conversation because your argument has fallen flat on its face.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
belvadeer





PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 1:36 am Reply with quote
I've never seen so many pages of back and forth on a game article here before. Same with the recent X Button. And all it took was a pair of boobs to stoke the fires. That says something.
Back to top
shamisen the great



Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon, USA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:09 am Reply with quote
belvadeer wrote:
I've never seen so many pages of back and forth on a game article here before. Same with the recent X Button. And all it took was a pair of boobs to stoke the fires. That says something.
A pair of grotesquely unrealistic boobs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
ikillchicken



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Posts: 7272
Location: Vancouver
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:54 am Reply with quote
GarnetStyle wrote:
ikillchicken wrote:
Nobody is buying this silly rhetoric. Just stop.


Your refusal to answer the question says more than an actual answer would. You're quick to cite it on something you disapprove of, but the minute it applies to something you do like, it's a silly rhetoric.


I didn't answer your question because I've already been through it several times. You're just parroting the same flawed rhetoric that people have been using since the start of this topic. Obviously it is impossible to please and include everyone and if you try to you'll just end up with a work that nobody likes. But this game could just as easily tone down the ridiculous female character designs without really diminishing what makes it good in any way. I should think it would be pretty clear too why it's okay to be exclusionary based on one's arbitrary and subjective taste but not so much when the exclusion centers heavily around a person's gender. If you're still going to pretend you don't see the distinction...well I give up. You can go ahead and pat yourself on the back for "winning" the argument. And all you had to do was pretend to be really really dumb. *slow clap*

Quote:
Comic books have had a stigma against female readers for the longest time so it makes the comparison all the more fitting.


And I'll be the first one to criticize them for it, just like with Dragon's Crown.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Oranges



Joined: 07 Aug 2013
Posts: 4
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:11 am Reply with quote
I wanted to chime in my thoughts on Dragon's Crown and all of these 'issues' so many people seem to having with their character designs. Although I don't believe there's anything wrong with mentioning the overly exaggerated art style it's always the tone in which they mention it that bothers me and many others. If it's distasteful, offensive or otherwise embarrassing to you, that's fine -- this game clearly isn't for you and you have every right to ignore this game.

What really annoys me are these things going on in EVERY Dragon's Crown thread:

The '14-year old jerk off fantasy' or 'you have the mind of a 14-year old' and how it's demeaning women.

Why demean the people who enjoy the art style and it's ARTIST for enjoying large breasts? Is it more mature to enjoy other parts of the female body? Or is it that you don't care about sex anymore? Some men like breasts, some like butts -- whatever the part, why does it matter? Yes, women aren't just sex objects and depicting them that way is harmful.

But Dragon's Crown DOES NOT depict them that way. So many people are so caught up in the art style and their own distaste for it that they seem to not notice that in no way are women inferior to males. They are in no way any more objectified then the male characters in this game either. The claim that males aren't sexualized and that they're some sort of 'power fantasy' is literally males looking at it from a male perspective. You're basically claiming that men can enjoy looking buff powerful while women would/should be embarrassed for showing cleavage and having overly large breasts. This again is incredibly one sided as women have every opportunity to 'fantasize' themselves as any of the character types as I truly believe they made every effort to make male/female equivalents of each body type. Just because you don't see the males as 'sexualized' doesn't mean they aren't.

Regardless, the point is if the art offends you -- obviously it's not to your taste or liking and you should pass. But this is George Kamitani's game, the one he wanted to make, so don't demean him or anyone who enjoys his work by saying it's in some way a bane to society or women. He doesn't need to tone it down because he made it the way HE WANTED TO. There's a difference between games that are made to be inclusive to everyone and games made because someone wants the make one out of pure passion and love for the medium. I believe this is the case with Dragon's Crown. Don't cry foul because you're personally offended by George's art direction as he has shown no sign of specifically trying to alienate or demean a particular gender.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faintsmile1992



Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 295
Location: England
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 6:27 am Reply with quote
Jesus, look at people go on about something so trivial.

It won't even matter in the long run, because over in Japan if you talk about some of the concepts expressed in this thread they'll think you're mad. As long as Japanese males (and females...?) will buy things like Dragons Crown they will continue to be produced. Still no publicity is bad publicity for the western sales, right?Wink

As for female gamers, I do actually understand something of this (at least in the UK). In the Megadrive/SNES era there were lots of girl gamers became alienated when the PlayStation (the Saturn and N64 never took off here) targeted more squarely at males with its menu of soccer games and racing, and PC gaming went down the gun mad FPS route, which was later to be followed by the consoles. So no, breast size isn't what alienated female gamers is it, not when Tomb Raider has been one of the most popular games among girls. Wink



If the games industry alienated females, a demographic that was actually neglected until recently, its only because the industry chose to concentrate on other demographics. There was no "sexism", its just that guns, racing cars and soccer don't appeal to most girls. If you look at games girls do play, they are different games that 'exclude' boys and men.

I do hope the industry doesn't bow down to the attention seekers on Tumblr and Reddit - sites where you can't even tell the genuine kooks from the trolls. If someone says it on Reddit, its best to ignore anyone said it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guile



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 595
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:39 am Reply with quote
The talk of alienating female buyers is a flawed one, because it assumes there actually are female buyers to alienate. While plenty of women play games already, how many more are realistically ready to jump into the hobby but hold back because of this? Are there any kind of numbers or is this mere speculation? I feel people on the internet lose sight of reality when it comes to issues like these. As a few female posters have apparently shown us so far, it's clearly not a cut and dry issue and there are plenty of females out there who seem perfectly fine with these issues. I can't imagine the thousands of Cammy and Chun Li cosplayers out there have an issue with objectification if they willingly dress as these characters. Surely they would not emulate characters they find problematic or horrible.

If the amount of females who buy products outweighs the supposed alienated female market, then it should not be a surprise when companies go for the bigger market. Remember, this is a business, and money talks. If people truly want to change something, they need to put their money where their mouth is. The problem is the money so far has been insignificant and irrelevant, and all the outcry of these issues are from a vocal minority who no sane company would listen to because they would lose money if they did. Remember Me became a poster child of this. It was shunned by publishers and told it wouldn't sell due to it's female protagonist, to which people said the publishers were being sexist. As fate would have it, Remember Me didn't sell in the end, and in fact was a terrible, terrible flop. Even if you found the view sexist, it was the correct view in the end. This hobby is a business first and foremost, after all. The market controls the medium, and if the amount of people who want change are as insignificant as they appear, you should not act surprised when you are ignored.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 13 of 18

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group