×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 11 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
NEWS: U.S. Judge Rules Against Digital Music Resales




Note: this is the discussion thread for this article
Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kougeru



Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 5589
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:10 pm Reply with quote
They should then be forced change the label on the button you press. Instead of "Buy this song" or whatever, it should be "Rent this" or "License this".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address My Anime My Manga
mgosdin



Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 1302
Location: Kissimmee, Florida, USA
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 1:16 pm Reply with quote
Like most missteps of this kind it will work it's way up in the courts until it gets corrected.

Mark Gosdin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
050795



Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 230
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:05 pm Reply with quote
People sale used digital music? This seems a little silly to me but whatever (I mean it's not like it's that much to buy a new mp3 or anything).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goggen



Joined: 08 Feb 2011
Posts: 88
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:55 pm Reply with quote
The real question here is; who in their right mind would want to pay money for a "used" mp3 file??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yamiangie



Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 465
PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:49 pm Reply with quote
I sort of get this because it's data and there's really no such thing as "used" with bits of code. But really Amazon has looked into reselling digital media. God I really hope this gets killed in other areas because I hate their secondary market for physical stuff most of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Polycell



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:37 pm Reply with quote
Goggen wrote:
The real question here is; who in their right mind would want to pay money for a "used" mp3 file??
It's as good as new, so there's little reason not to. Unlike, say, used houses that people shell out boatloads for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yuna49



Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 3804
PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:29 pm Reply with quote
From the article:
Quote:
The judge stated "the first-sale defense is limited to material items, like records, that the copyright owner put into the stream of commerce."

The definition of a "work" in US copyright law requires that it be "fixed in a medium."
Quote:
A work is “fixed” in a tangible medium of expression when its embodiment in a copy or phonorecord, by or under the authority of the author, is sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration. A work consisting of sounds, images, or both, that are being transmitted, is “fixed” for purposes of this title if a fixation of the work is being made simultaneously with its transmission. (17 USC 101)

The notion of whether digital files constitute "works" under the statute has arisen before. Browsers nearly always make copies of works in local storage, a process which could be viewed as infringing. That process was exempted because it was ruled as a required aspect of viewing a site. Similarly the copyright status of computer programs loaded into memory has been a subject of litigation.

I, for one, think a computer file on a storage medium like a disk drive or memory card is "fixed," but the judge in this case apparently disagrees. He may simply have a rather old-fashioned view, or he might be reluctant to make new law in this area. I haven't followed the precedents in this area, nor have I read his decision, but this is a complex issue that should not be summarily dismissed as commentators on sites like this one often do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RoverTX



Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 424
PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:47 pm Reply with quote
<rant>What a god awful ruling. It scares me that there are judges that can't seem to grasp that the internet is a real thing and the rule of law should apply equally. I mean for gods sake its like they have never used a computer.</rant>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guildmaster



Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 364
Location: Hot & Humid FL
PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 11:49 am Reply with quote
Kougeru wrote:
They should then be forced change the label on the button you press. Instead of "Buy this song" or whatever, it should be "Rent this" or "License this".


You are licensing it, or did you not read the fine print?

I'm in agreement with the judge's ruling, but i can't stand amazon or apple and their DRM BS either...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group