You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 19 years old before posting.
Forum - View topicNEWS: 4Kids 2004 Financials
Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Mello
Posts: 2312 Location: Online Terminal |
|
|||
The revenue's up and the income is down
The people ride in a hole in the ground 4Kids 4Kids *clears throat* Okay, couple questions. 1) How is this possible, 2) Is this good or bad, and 3) Should we care? |
||||
PlayBoi
Posts: 119 Location: Cali |
|
|||
Simple answer, they spent more.
2003 they spent - $87.3 million 2004 they spent - $90.6 million So even though they made $1.2 million more in 2004, that's offset by the $3.3 million more they spent. Given them a net income loss of $2.1 million compared to 2003. |
||||
biliano
Posts: 956 Location: Cleveland, OH |
|
|||
For those of you that read the 4Kids financial report and don't know what the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act of 2002 is, I did some searching and here is a summary of the act. Section 404 of the Act states:
This act was implemented in wake of the Enron crisis in 2002.
If you're a stockholder, yes. StockScouter rated 4Kids Entertainment's stock a 4 out of 10. According to this report, they expect 4Kids Entertainment's stock to underperform the market over the next six months with average risk. |
||||
Necros Antiquor
Posts: 571 Location: Funny in a car crash sort of way |
|
|||
Ah ha, I just got that! New York New York. Jeez, I knew I heard that somewhere, and it took me 10 minutes before I knew it. |
||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group