View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
casenumber00
Joined: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 167
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 5:27 pm
|
|
|
Interesting that the trademark wasnt for the mangaka or ufotable.
|
Back to top |
|
|
ranran-001
Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Posts: 544
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 5:43 pm
|
|
|
casenumber00 wrote: | Interesting that the trademark wasnt for the mangaka or ufotable. |
The trademark would apply towards most if not all forms of media and products.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lynx Raven Raide
Joined: 01 Nov 2017
Posts: 412
Location: Central Coast, AU
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 8:45 pm
|
|
|
Kinda surprised Kyōjurō Rengoku's wasn't rejected tbh, cause there are plenty of things out there with a similar flame design. The other rejections are understandable, and those accepted are unique enough. I just wonder how this will be applied, though, cause they would be stupid to go after fan art, though there are certain areas which don't care about trademarks and will continue to produce stuff with those designs
|
Back to top |
|
|
KarlFranz
Joined: 17 Jun 2019
Posts: 185
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 10:11 pm
|
|
|
Lynx Raven Raide wrote: | Kinda surprised Kyōjurō Rengoku's wasn't rejected tbh, cause there are plenty of things out there with a similar flame design. The other rejections are understandable, and those accepted are unique enough. I just wonder how this will be applied, though, cause they would be stupid to go after fan art, though there are certain areas which don't care about trademarks and will continue to produce stuff with those designs |
Japanese copyright law don't really care about stuffs like fanart (just look at the doujin scenes in Japan). They mostly care about other company using their copyrighted stuffs and people who use their official works without permission.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Actar
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 1074
Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2021 7:43 am
|
|
|
Hm... I wonder why these trademarks weren't applied for when the series began? Surely all the costumes and patterns in the anime/manga would have to have been trademarked?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alan45
Village Elder
Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 10013
Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2021 7:08 pm
|
|
|
@Actar
It probably wouldn't have been worth the effort until the series hit big. I suspect this is in direct response to someone trying to use the patterns and ride their coattails.
|
Back to top |
|
|
ranran-001
Joined: 25 Oct 2018
Posts: 544
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2021 7:27 pm
|
|
|
Actar wrote: | Hm... I wonder why these trademarks weren't applied for when the series began? Surely all the costumes and patterns in the anime/manga would have to have been trademarked? |
The costumes would have already been trademarked yes. But if you sold a kimono with green and black squares on it, its okay so long as its not sold in association with demon slayer.
So by trademarking the patterns, its an additional level of protection, the pattern itself, not just the character and its clothing, will be trademarked.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|