Forum - View topicRavemaster edits?
|
|
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
wizard55
 Posts: 198 |
|
||
|
does anyone have a list or something of the edits, cuts, and changes to the anime on toonami, Ravemaster. I can see from watching one episode lots of stuff was changed.
|
|||
|
|||
|
wizard55
Posts: 198 |
|
||
|
any ideas!! you anime people must know!!?
|
|||
|
|||
|
lianncoop
Past ANN Contributor
 Posts: 1705 Location: Indiana |
|
||
|
I'm sure when the DVD gets released in October, the Edit List on Rave Master will be up.
|
|||
|
|||
Emerje
 Posts: 7432 Location: Maine |
|
||
We've been asked a few times not to discuss edits. Emerje |
|||
|
|||
Pepperidge
 Posts: 1106 Location: British Columbia, Canada |
|
||
|
It's POTENTIAL edits that shouldn't be discussed. If the edits have already been made, it makes no difference.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Emerje
Posts: 7432 Location: Maine |
|
||
|
No, we were told that discussing current edits could impact future edits. Saying that we were suprised something was left in could mean to them that it needs to be taken out in a future episode.
Emerje |
|||
|
|||
|
DeSpawn
Posts: 82 Location: Boston, MA |
|
||
|
Hi, got a quick question about edits.
Ok, I’ve seen this topic pop up a few times, about not discussing Edits (recent .hack//dusk). Whether they are hypothetical, theoretical edit discussion and edits that have been done. Though I've not seen Ravemaster, I'm always curious about edits and find edit discussion super FUN! But who has made the request on the board to not discuss edits to a show. What is a Moderator, was it a group of older, elder, concerned members, or has it become (been incorporated into) an unwritten rule of the forums that have resulted from what has happened before with the discussion of edits. I know that because of talk on many a message board at some point; Cartoon Network has taken action to correct some previous "Missed" edits and probably influenced future edits and what not. Also who's releasing Ravemaster? Who's the company? Ravemaster may end up being one of those DVD released that are edited like Yu Gi Oh or Zoids. (PS I can easily just look up who releasing it but I'm a very lazy man) -DeSpawn |
|||
|
|||
Poppycock
 Posts: 119 Location: IL |
|
||
|
Rave Masters is being relesed by Tokyopop so dont woory bout a only edited DVD
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nagisa
Moderator
 Posts: 6128 Location: Atlanta-ish, Jawjuh |
|
||
Both now. Anyway, yeah it's only potential edits that are taboo, as saying something "should have" been cut will mean the second time that show goes through, those edits people "wanted" to see have a greater chance of actually happening. Edits that actually happen are open to discussion, as Cartoon Network's shown in the past that they can't undo edits that were made, only add new ones. |
|||
|
|||
|
rainking187
Posts: 35 |
|
||
|
[quote="Nagisa"][quote="DeSpawn"]But who has made the request on the board to not discuss edits to a show. What is a Moderator, was it a group of older, elder, concerned members[/quote]
Both now. Anyway, yeah it's only potential edits that are taboo, as saying something "should have" been cut will mean the second time that show goes through, those edits people "wanted" to see have a greater chance of actually happening. Edits that actually happen are open to discussion, as Cartoon Network's shown in the past that they can't undo edits that were made, only add new ones.[/quote] Why would anyone say something should be cut? I think we should be glad when stuff is uncut. |
|||
|
|||
|
Emerje
Posts: 7432 Location: Maine |
|
||
The problem isn't with people saying things should be cut, it's in how a company might interpret what's being said. If someone was to say, "Wow, I can't believe they left in that part with the kid with a gun!" the person saying it may mean it as being great, but a rep could just as easily see that as having been a comment on something that should have left out. Emerje |
|||
|
|||
|
Nagisa
Moderator
Posts: 6128 Location: Atlanta-ish, Jawjuh |
|
||
Heed the quotation marks. Okay, let me use Gundam SEED episode nine as an example. The shower scene was left intact, causing people to post on ANN and elsewhere about how they're surprised it's there and "knowing CN, it should've been cut since they don't show that sort of thing." Hypothetically, a CN exec read this, and the split-second panty shot in episode ten was cut out because fans said that content "should have been" edited last week. Not saying fans WANT that to happen, but when they go on about edits that "should have happened" by "CN standards," then those edits tend to actually happen later on in said show. You get it now? |
|||
|
|||
|
Emerje
Posts: 7432 Location: Maine |
|
||
|
Which is why I say we shouldn't talk about current edits any more than edits that haven't happened yet.
Emerje |
|||
|
|||
|
CyberSilver
Posts: 58 |
|
||
|
No... its why we shouldnt talk about things that SHOULD have, WOULD have, or COULD have, been edits. Current edits are FINE. F. I. N. E. Shoulda Coulda Woulda don't count as current. Like its OK to list edits. Just don't list NON edits.
Edit: And on a COMPLETLY unrelated note Emerje, your avy is da bomb! I wonder How you get the other letters to look like they where part of the tattoo and not just slapped on. |
|||
|
|||
|
Emerje
Posts: 7432 Location: Maine |
|
||
OK, you're catching me on wording here. Yeah, talking about edits that did happen probably wont do any damage, heck ANN has an edit list archive. When I say "current edits" I mean edits that did AND didn't happen as apposed to edits that should and shouldn't have happened. I guess I'm the only one that's thinking that way, I'll try harder to go the way everyone else is. Emerje (as for the avatar, I didn't make it, I explaine it in the Avatar topic though) |
|||
|
|||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group