×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Hey, Answerman! [2007-09-07]


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Cephus



Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 139
Location: Redlands, CA
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:08 pm Reply with quote
irishninja wrote:
(And yes, Star Wars is an exception—George Lucas doesn't care about contradicting licensed fic. IIRC, he even said so once in an interview. Classy. Rolling Eyes )


Come on, George Lucas doesn't care if his MOVIES contradict each other, why would he care about the books?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Furudanuki



Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 1874
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:22 pm Reply with quote
Dargonxtc wrote:
Neverwhere wrote:
Anime_Freak wrote:
Pardon my "dumbness" but what on earth is a "moe" anime? I have never heard of this term til today.


Really? o.O

And yet you're obviously a regular here at ANN...*amused*

Well here is what ANN has on it.

That definition is a convenient starting point, but I'd strongly recommend checking other sources to get a more rounded viewpoint (Wikipedia and Google are your friends). The ANN definition makes some absolute blanket assertions when the reality is nowhere near so simple.
ANN definition of moé wrote:
"To be properly moe, a character must be (emphasis mine) eager or perky, not overly independent, and call forth a desire in the viewer to protect them and nurture them."

Many characters thought to be moé are neither eager nor perky. For example:
    Yuki Nagato - The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
    Rei Ayanami - Neon Genesis Evangelion
    Mai Kawasumi - Kanon
    Sakaki - Azumanga Daioh
    Machi - Nagasarete Airantou
    Primula - Shuffle!
    Anju Maaka - Karin
Many characters thought to be moé are quite independent. For example:
    Nanoha Takamachi & Fate Testarossa - Magical Girl Lyrical Nanoha & sequels
    Akiko Minase - Kanon
    Ama Shigure - Shuffle!
    Shana - Shakugan no Shana
    Maria - Hayate the Combat Butler
    Akira E. Ferrari, Alicia Florence & Athena Glory - ARIA the Animation & sequels
    Matsuri Shihou - sola
The "call forth a desire in the viewer to protect them and nurture them" fits in very well with my own concept of moé, but I'll be the first to concede that other viewpoints exist. In short, different people will be looking for different characteristics and traits that will induce them to feel moé about a character. I might have a weakness for the quiet and shy bookworm type, while your preference might run more toward the happy-go-lucky tomboy. Both types can be moé - just not necessarily to the same person. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
sabriyahm



Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 292
Location: Georgia
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 4:52 pm Reply with quote
Zac wrote:
they must be so addled by reading fantasy and sci-fi falderal by hacks like Mercedes Lackey or Laurell K. Hamilton that they just don't know what good writing is anymore.


You lose 50 cool points for calling Lackey a hack!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Zac
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 7912
Location: Anime News Network Technodrome
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:05 pm Reply with quote
sabriyahm wrote:
Zac wrote:
they must be so addled by reading fantasy and sci-fi falderal by hacks like Mercedes Lackey or Laurell K. Hamilton that they just don't know what good writing is anymore.


You lose 50 cool points for calling Lackey a hack!


She is. She also has a legion of ghost writers, a'la RL Stine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
kyokun703



Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2505
Location: Orgrimmar
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:11 pm Reply with quote
sabriyahm wrote:
Zac wrote:
they must be so addled by reading fantasy and sci-fi falderal by hacks like Mercedes Lackey or Laurell K. Hamilton that they just don't know what good writing is anymore.


You lose 50 cool points for calling Lackey a hack!

While Lackey's original books (Arrows and the Vanyel trilogy) weren't bad, the rest of her books are pretty bad, and *extremely* formulaic. I was able to predict what would happen where in every single book.

LKH has degenerated into almost solid porn. It isn't even any fun anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
petran79



Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 122
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:36 pm Reply with quote
Just as it happens with Japanese animation today, the quality works are fewe also in US animation.

American animation has some good works that unfortunately are not that widely known like they deserve to be.

One example is Fritz the Cat. The first x-rated animated movie. Even if it doesnt reach the wit of the comic strip it still has some unique visuals. Screened at a time when there were actually animated movies for adults, like most of R. Bakshi's works . The Japanese own a lot to this movie.

Also Billy Plympton's work are very funny as well as D.Herzfeld.

Overall look for the Oscar short animation winners and nominees. You'll find many masterpieces unlikely to be seen on TV.

Who can forget movies like "A boy named Charlie Brown".

Also works by J.Humbley are of the best I've seen and other UPA classics.

They're the kind of titles that give US animation a uniqueness and originality



Problem is how to make these works more widely known to a wider audience. I've seen younger viewers who have the energy to watch and know almost every low quality new anime or cartoon, but are prejudiced towards different and older animation.

And the older viewers are not what TV broadcasters have in mind. What is rather missing is an education in animation (credit to Rembrand Films for the excellent documentary 'The animated century'). If TV broadcasters regard children as consumers then cartoons will never rise in quality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kenotic



Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 167
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:58 pm Reply with quote
Anime_Freak wrote:
Pardon my "dumbness" but what on earth is a "moe" anime? I have never heard of this term til today.


Can I be you?

Seriously, I think the thing is overblown. Like a said before, it seems like everything with female leads is considered "moe," an overly cute female (which is most anime through the years) even more so.

I guess if I had to boil it down to one character, watch "The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya" and study Mikuru Asahina. She was all but created to be a "moe" stereotype.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Berserkfury819



Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 229
Location: Detroit Mi. Spider-Man is dead. R.I.P.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:39 pm Reply with quote
Before I start on fan fiction, I would like to point out that Christopher Tolkien did not write any Middle Earth books. He edited them. The whole history of Middle Earth Series are essentially J.R.R. Tolkiens rough drafts, and they were published so that people could look at his original ideas. "The Silmarilion" is a group of stories about the makings of Middle Earth and the history of the elves. J.R.R. Tolkien died before he could publish it, and so his son edited the stories, put them in order and got them published. The book that came out earlier this year "The Children of Hurin" is essentially an extended version of one of the stories in "The Silmarilion."

Zac, thank you for calling out Lackey and Hamilton.

Fan fiction. I'm probably going to get a lot of hatred for this, but I can't stand fan fiction, and here's why. I'm a writing major in college, and as someone who writes his own stories and is constantly revising and editing my own work, I think its disgusting that someone else can come along and write a story with characters established by someone else. It's hack, there's no talent behind it, and its the easy way out. Coming up with your own characters and plots is hard and a lot of time has to be put into it (unless your R.A. Salvatore or Christopher Paolini). If you want your work to be taken seriously, create something. If all your doing is using someone else's characters for your own story, its essentially plagarism. If I may quote George R.R. Martin "Write in your own universe. If you don't excercise those literary muscles, you'll never develop them."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Kyuriko



Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 152
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:25 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
What is exactly missing from North American animation that would make them look like their Japanese counterparts? Is it the shading? The color palette? The backgrounds? The framerates? The closest thing NA has come up with is Avatar, but something still feels lacking. Can you provide an analysis using this show as a basis?


If I wanted to watch Japanese animation, I would watch Japanese animation.

duo05001 wrote:
Rurouni Kenshin Oh My God! I hated how Kenshin sounded in the Japanese. verson also Aoshi sounded like a little girl too.

Also I understand at times charcters sound better in the Japanese. voices as well to note a few the entire cast of naruto, Rukia from bleach the entire cast of Eva and those are just a few I could come up wiht off the top of my head.


I cannot say that I was too fond of Suzukaze as Kenshin either; I much preferred Casino's performance. While it is true that Watsuki had based the character on Kawakami Gensai and wanted him to have a feminine appearance even as an assassin, I still enjoy that Casino made a clear distinction between the "assassin" and the "rurôni". The loss of catchphrases in translation are always a disappointment to me because it is their trademark, but it has never really bothered me because there are some things that simply cannot be translated.

And before anyone rushes to their defense, I actually do enjoy most of the Japanese cast - just not Kenshin.

Quote:
The translators need to not just translate the words, but also try to grasp, to the best of their abilities, the fundamental concepts and underlying meanings, which are all best noted when viewing the original and seeing how what is said can be interpreted.


That, my friend, is the very definition of what translation is - it is the translator's job to go beyond simply finding an English equivalent of words and phrases in a foreign language. I am honestly having a hard time understanding what you are trying to say in your second point, though; care to provide a few examples to clarify your argument? And translators are viewing the original when making their translations - otherwise, what on earth are they translating from? What is to say that fan translations are not doing the exact same thing you are accusing official translators of doing? I cannot tell you how many times fan translations have made extremely - almost too - literal translations. But in the end, hearing this endless debate about translations grates my last nerve. There is no one "right" way to interpret something. But if you think you would do a better job than they can, then by all means be my guest.

Quote:
So, although I know perfectly well it'd be the kiss of death for sales, I'd be perfectly happy if all the dubs were eliminated. I can't say I've listened to more than one or two dubs on the dvds I've bought, and those only because people said the jokes were better or the lyrics were vastly different or whatever.


Yes, because dropping the atomic bomb on the anime market just because you and a handful of hardcore fans prefer subtitles would be a downright dandy idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
The Xenos



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Boston
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:37 pm Reply with quote
Lady Multi wrote:
Dargonxtc wrote:
I would say I mostly agree with yours and Zac's assessment of fanfic, however...

The Xenos wrote:
Again, here comes my total distaste for fan fic. It's masturbation. I'm not even talking about the pornographic ones. It's creative masturbation. Instead of creating something of your own, you're taking someone else's characters you like and waking off to them on paper. Excuse my bluntness, but I'm just sick of seeing people wasting time cranking out this fluff.


I was just wondering what your, or Zac's if he wants, opinion on published works like like Star Wars*, Star Trek, Aliens, Conan, Halo, etc, etc.

*Obviously I am not talking about the authors directly related to the original concept of the story or show, but the many spin-off novels that come off of them.


I echo that statement about teh Star Wars and Star Trek books. They're simply glorified fanfiction after all. My Mom thinks so, too, and she is the one who owns them.


And then there's DC Comics or Marvel Comics where Characters created decades ago are still being milked by writers and editors today.

Of course the difference is that someone from the copyright owner approves of these and hires the writers. Though the results are varying degrees. (I don't want to even get into the whole copy right and creators rights debate here.)

One prime example right now is Wonder Woman. She's been tossed around from author to author with one set of issues not even matching what happened the previous year, never mind how the character was ten or so years ago. You have one author writing a character and the next one or even a concurrent one writing the same character in a different way. Now ideally editors are supposed to prevent this and make sure the author knows the character, but not every editor does their job right. Personally, I think DC editorial right now is a damned mess. (And let's not get me started on the more cult favorite character of The Question who've I've really gotten into in recent years.)

Murasakisuishou wrote:

So writing is not as hard as drawing? Excuse me, but as both a fan artist and a writer (of original work) I beg to differ. My average art piece takes about a day, sometimes two days because of my penchant for drawing at four AM. I won't say that I'm the best artist out there, because I know I'm not, but I've been drawing fanart for a number of years and I like to think I've reached a certain level of skill.

Yet, if I were to take one of my drawings and try to write a short story about it, it would take far longer. I spend weeks on a single chapter of the novel I'm writing, just because I continually go back and revise, trying to make it as good as possible. Drawing may look more impressive, but I would have to say that writing takes just as much, if not more, effort.

Of course, there are BILLIONS of bad fanfics out there. There's no denying this; I've read more than my fair share, and as a general rule I don't look at much fanfiction anymore because most of it is utter twaddle. And you're right, a lot of it is just ahuge fan wank. But I've also seen a few genuinely well-written fanfics that are basically just side stories that fit within the realm of the fandom, yet don't impose on it. Not all fanfiction is crap.

Personally, I'm not looking to sell my work, so I have nothing to say with regard to that argument; I would just like it understood that some fanfiction authors write to excersize their skills with familiar characters and get critique on it before moving on to original pieces. Don't lump them in with all the screaming yaoi fangirls.


I was mainly focusing on these fans who somehow think fan fic is something to sell. The thing is, as much work as you put into it, the idea of selling it at con just doesn't work. With fanart, as Answerman said, you see what you're getting. It's something to sell. Writing not only takes more work to make, it takes more work to read and grasp the quality.

Maybe it's because I try to write myself and cannot draw, but I think drawing a character and making them recognizable takes more skill than writing down their name. Any idiot can write a fanfic by just putting down their name. Sure, they usually are written horribly out of character, but they still are instantly recognizable because someone else has already made a name for them. You're riding on that character someone else made and named. Yet with fan art you have to work more on likeness so someone can take one glance and know who it is.

This is why I'm interested in selling comics myself at cons, original ones. Being illustrated as a comic., it's easier to show off. You have an image and it's easier for the reader to skim a comic than a written novel. Though, again, I'd rather focus my time on original characters than waste time on pure fan art and fan fiction. I admit I'd like to toss in a fun parody strip or pinup here and there, especially if you're selling at an anime con, but I don't want it to be the crux of the book.

Last Otakon I attended, I loved checking out the small press and self published comics people had. That was so much more interesting than random fanart of characters from established anime and manga. If I want art, I'll hunt down a legit poster. Though I confess to picking up some prints of more obscure series, namely a Blame! poster by Dan Kim. Plus I do have some Sandman fanart I've gotten at comic cons, namely some prints and a couple actual paintings by Japanese style painter Andy Lee.

Oh and I got a FLCL print from my friend who was selling prints. My friend has a web comic yet unfortunately doesn't quite agree on my self publishing comics idea. He's sticking to just fan art prints as well as selling stuff in costume. Yet, hey, it's his booth and it's his choice. If I want to do things my way, then I should get my own booth. It's his comic and artist's alley table, he calls the shots.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Xenos



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Boston
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:41 pm Reply with quote
Berserkfury819 wrote:
Fan fiction. I'm probably going to get a lot of hatred for this, but I can't stand fan fiction, and here's why. I'm a writing major in college, and as someone who writes his own stories and is constantly revising and editing my own work, I think its disgusting that someone else can come along and write a story with characters established by someone else. It's hack, there's no talent behind it, and its the easy way out. Coming up with your own characters and plots is hard and a lot of time has to be put into it (unless your R.A. Salvatore or Christopher Paolini). If you want your work to be taken seriously, create something. If all your doing is using someone else's characters for your own story, its essentially plagarism. If I may quote George R.R. Martin "Write in your own universe. If you don't excercise those literary muscles, you'll never develop them."


Amen! Thank you for being honest and straight forward about it. I guess even I wasn't brave enough to come out and say it. Plus that's an amazing quote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Xenos



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 1519
Location: Boston
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:55 pm Reply with quote
Zac wrote:

The distinction, I think, is upsetting to you because you want to be taken as seriously as a professional author; you want people to look at your fanfiction the same way they look at Timothy Zahn's officially licensed Star Wars novels because you don't want to feel like your work is inferior. But the truth of the matter is, we have a publishing industry filled with people who know quality when they see it and are willing to elevate someone from unpublished amateur to published professional, and that's how the system works. If your book is hardbound, printed professionally and placed on a shelf for $17.95, it's because someone in a position of authority to put it there did so. And that's how it works. That's how you get taken seriously as a professional author. It's based on a number of things, and it might not be a totally fair system, but it doesn't have to be. You don't deserve to be taken seriously as a writer; it's something you have to earn, and being picked up by a legitimate publisher is one way to do that. Dumping out some anime fanfiction does not make you an author any more than scribbling on a napkin makes you an artist. These are professions, things people do for a living. You can't erase the line between amateur and professional just because you don't like being called an amateur.

You're also making the serious mistake of comparing today's 400-page internet harry potter yaoi epics to something like Alan Moore's Lost Girls or Christopher Tolkien's Middle Earth books; they're not the same thing, not at all. One has no clout, no backing, nothing to suggest it might have some quality to it. The other has a name, an established presence, the backing of a publisher. They passed the test, they got it published. If Alan Moore rewrites Cinderella and you do the same thing, I'm going to assume Alan Moore's version is better. Why? He's proven himself to be an amazing writer, someone whose genius has captured the attention of millions, including his publishers at DC Comics. He put the effort in to get his work published, he took it seriously enough to be successful. A fanfiction writer is just someone who's self-publishing her own stories on Livejournal or whatever; why do they deserve to be on the same playing field as Moore, simply because they believe they're doing the same thing he is? I'd argue he's operating at a different level than an amateur and his success proves that.

I paint in my spare time. I'm not an artist, I just paint in my spare time. I don't scan them in and post them all over the internet and then say "I'm the same as Picasso because hey we're both doing the same thing and who's to say what's worth your time and money and what isn't". I recognize that Picasso was a master and a professional and I am not. I don't put the effort in to become a successful, serious artist; I make no real attempt to have my paintings shown in a gallery. Therein lies the difference.

Nobody's telling you you can't write whatever the hell you want all day long, but when you ask to be taken seriously or respected the same as a professional author, that's when you're crossing the line. Yes, you can write your own version of Cinderella. No, I'm not interested in reading it. If Alan Moore does it, then yes, I am interested. That's the long and short of it.


Man, I think that deserves to be edited into the column proper. I especially love:

Quote:
"Dumping out some anime fanfiction does not make you an author any more than scribbling on a napkin makes you an artist."


I'm going to have to keep that and quote you on it in the future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Richard J.



Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 3367
Location: Sic Semper Tyrannis.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:50 pm Reply with quote
I'm going to comment on fan fiction, since I've written a little. The vast majority is crap. A small portion, however, could be considered practice for original quality writing. (Yes, I arrogantly consider what little I've written in this way.)

Writing using another person's characters and world setting isn't easy if you're trying to match your characterization and plotting to their style. However, it does provide a way to test your own abilities at writing. It can be more comfortable than starting completely from scratch and it can allow a person to develop an idea or character in a setting that lets them work out the parts that don't really work with zero risk to any personal creation.

Most fan fiction is bad, some is good, and in twenty years you might come across an interview with a successful novelist who mentions that they posted some crappy fic long ago for Naruto or whatever.

I'm not really trying to defend anything. There is a ton of absolute garbage out there. Yet you can find a very few gems of well written fic.

All I'm saying is the earliest writings of some great authors were probably garbage too before they spent a few more years writing various things. Some fan fiction is practice for the real thing, the majority is just the work of people who should know better. Kind of like watching American Idol when they show all the auditions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Kyokat



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 50
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:56 pm Reply with quote
Do all of you complaining about fanfic/art also hate doujin for not being 100% original? I'd mention AMVs, but Zac has already expressed that he thinks using other people's music (or at least Weird Al's) is a complete copout and people should record their own.

What about when Disney reinvents Aladdin and The Little Mermaid? What about Sgt Frog, which uses Gundam left and right? Hell, what about sequels? Pirates of the Caribbean 2 was such a cop out; they should have spent that time coming up with new characters.

Half the fun of pop culture is sharing it with others, and going "I like this, and wouldn't it be cool if the characters also did this?" And people like the familar. So what if it relies on already created characters? Maybe it'll give them more depth and flesh them out.

Yes, a lot of fanfiction is crap, but so is a lot of everything else. That's no reason to act like you're better than someone else because they write it and you don't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zac
ANN Executive Editor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 7912
Location: Anime News Network Technodrome
PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 10:14 pm Reply with quote
Kyokat wrote:
Do all of you complaining about fanfic/art also hate doujin for not being 100% original? I'd mention AMVs, but Zac has already expressed that he thinks using other people's music (or at least Weird Al's) is a complete copout and people should record their own.

What about when Disney reinvents Aladdin and The Little Mermaid? What about Sgt Frog, which uses Gundam left and right? Hell, what about sequels? Pirates of the Caribbean 2 was such a cop out; they should have spent that time coming up with new characters.
.


You dumping out some lazy-ass hackneyed Trigun fanfiction is not the same as Disney's creative team making a version of Aladdin or a sequel to an ongoing franchise.

Please stop equating fanfiction with anything that's remotely derivative, including sequels. It's not the same thing. It's not about being "totally original", it's about quality and creativity.

It's awfully presumptuous of you to assume that someone writing fanfiction is giving the characters "more depth". I'm really getting the stink of ego from a lot of these "fanfiction is the same as major motion pictures and anything that's ever referenced anything ever!" excuses. You are not Gore Verbinski, you are not JK Rowling.

How dare we call a spade a spade, I know, but xxHaRrYxDrAc0xx's 50 page text file about how Harry Potter and Cho Chang cut their hair between chapters 50 and 51 of Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince is not the same as Pirates of the Caribbean 2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 6 of 13

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group