Forum - View topic

NEWS: Australia Fines Man for Importing Pornographic Anime

Oh, so rape victims seeking emotional support from counselling are all losers who worship quacks? Counselling doesn't necessarily have to be founded on science as long as it achieves the effect of communcating verballing/emotionally with the person involved and find out how him/her can have less trouble living within the boundaries of society.

And as I've said, adult shops outside of Japan don't tend to carry rape material.

wrote:
That is true, but say he/she never looked at loli-hentai ever in his/her life and never knew that he found seeing children having sex arousing.

wrote:
Oh and any one interested in the issues of pedophilia and first amendment rights should google Jack McClellan. He's a pedophile in California currently making a big deal about being a pedophile.

Congrats, on the children but can you get inside your neighbour's head and know 100% that they wouldn't do that to your children. What happends if one of your neighbour has a habit of jerking off to loli-hentai and you don't know them personally? Would you honestly want your children around that neighbour?

Well, if they are aroused over the content, who is to say they wouldn't want to act out their fantasies in real life? Why stick with a fantasy when they can make it become a reality? After all, human beings need release and have urges.

No mater how much stuff someone watches it can never make them do anything they weren’t going to do on their own anyway.

For example someone could make a video showing how to make bombs or something, and if that video were widely shown (I'm sure it would be censored/illegal though) then there might be *slightly* more bombings in the world soon after, from a few people who learned how to make bombs from the video and already had the desire to hurt others to begin with.

But it's not sold in stores is it? Hrmm, maybe it is. I did some checking just now. Well, it's legality been challenged or called into question numerous times but it seems to have been deemed legal in the end.

Well, in that case, a video version of it should be legal too. But one doesn't exist, so who knows. Smile And if a video version of "How to Make Bombs" or "How to Commit Crime and Get Away With It" is legal, then all the more reason that animated child-porn should be legal, so all the better for the pedophiles!!

child of Lilith wrote:

No mater how much stuff someone watches it can never make them do anything they weren’t going to do on their own anyway.

I'm on your side on this issue but even I don't know if I would go THAT far. I think there are a few things that someone could be shown that could help them to do something they wouldn't do otherwise. For example someone could make a video showing how to make bombs or something, and if that video were widely shown (I'm sure it would be censored/illegal though) then there might be *slightly* more bombings in the world soon after, from a few people who learned how to make bombs from the video and already had the desire to hurt others to begin with.

But I don't think that applies in this scenario anyway.

Quote:

But it's not sold in stores is it? Hrmm, maybe it is. I did some checking just now. Well, it's legality been challenged or called into question numerous times but it seems to have been deemed legal in the end. Well, in that case, a video version of it should be legal too. But one doesn't exist, so who knows. Smile And if a video version of "How to Make Bombs" or "How to Commit Crime and Get Away With It" is legal, then all the more reason that animated child-porn should be legal, so all the better for the pedophiles!!

I really didn't want to bud in because this topic is old but read this article and tell me paedophiles have no motivation to harm a child:

http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/249640

loli-hentai is the same as child porn and if it wasn't an escape for this guy, then how many children would be at risk of being molested? You still haven't answerd me when I asked what kind of message does that tell society if real child porn is banned but animated isn't.

[
It's the same thing! If real child porn is banned because it's wrong to have sex with a child, then why is animated child porn available? It sends the same message. You know what, don't answer. This topic is too old.

Yep, one guy clearly represents every person just like him. Just like the Columbine duo represents all violent video game players.

Oh yeah, regarding Fate/Stay Night...that reminds me. Tsukihime, a non-hentai anime (based on a doujin game, but the anime is commercial) shows Arcueid having sex with Shiki and Shiki is in high school. He is a minor. Arcueid clearly committed jaibait rape with an underage minor and broke the law. But anyone can buy and watch Tsukihime in any country.

Is not watching Tsukihime promoting other viewers to also have sex with minors?

The only different with Tsukihime and any regular hentai anime is that an actual hentai anime shows more clearly and more explicitly what they are doing. But they are clearly doing the same thing in Tsukihime.

nightmaregenie wrote:

Oh, so rape victims seeking emotional support from counselling are all losers who worship quacks? Counselling doesn't necessarily have to be founded on science as long as it achieves the effect of communcating verballing/emotionally with the person involved and find out how him/her can have less trouble living within the boundaries of society.

People who seek out counselors for emotional support are indeed seeing a quack (someone who engages in a profession that is not scientific, but pretends like his profession is). However, you are correct it is possible that a counselor could help in the scenario you mentioned. But it's also possible that talking to one's parents or friends could help just as much, if not more than, talking to a counselor.

People have the freedom to waste their money however they want however. So if a rape victim wants to waste money seeing a counselor, that's their choice. But counseling should never be mandatory (even though it is sometimes, usually only if laws have been severely broken, and even this is a stupid practice) since it is a quack art. People should never be forced to go to counseling. Especially not to "cure" something that is not even a sickness in the first place. Pedophilia is not a sickness. Even the 6-year old toddler version is not a sickness. It's just abnormal. It does not need to be cured. And the 15-year old girl version of pedophilia is even completely normal.

Insisting that pedophilia, in any form, needs to be "cured" through counseling (or any other method) is like insisting that gays need to be cured from being gay. Or insisting that people who are ugly need to be cured from being ugly. Or that blacks need to be cured from being black. Or that Buddhists need to be cured and converted to Christianity. And sending a pedophile to "counseling" (a worthless practice) is not gonna be any more helpful than sending him to a quack who waves around a magic wand and claims to cure people through "magic".

I'm gonna say it again so that I attract the wrath of all the idiots here who keep mentioning "counseling". Counseling is FAKE, it is for losers!! It's a stupid profession and everyone who does it is a quack!!

I'm gonna say it again so that I attract the wrath of all the idiots here who keep mentioning "counseling". Counseling is FAKE, it is for losers!! It's a stupid profession and everyone who does it is a quack!!