Forum - View topic

Which of the big SJ three (Kishimoto, Oda, and Kubo) is more sexist?

All three writers have their sexist traits.

Kishimoto- The women rarely do anything useful.
Oda- The women wear revealing clothing and have breasts the size of watermelons.
Kubo- Both.

I want to say Kubo is the most sexist, but then you have characters like Rangiku and Soi Fon that actually are useful in battle.

Kishimoto is accused of putting women on the sidelines, but there's Tsunade, who is physically strong. Sakura got better and became a medic. Hinata spoiler[pep-talked Naruto into not giving up against Obito and Madara]. It takes more than being able to punch somebody to be useful.

Oda, while he writes women that are useful in battle, he either overly sexualizes them or makes them constantly complain. When "One Piece" started, Nami had a more subtle look. She dressed normally and her breasts were human sized. Now, she looks like a stripper.

Again, this is why I can't decide which one is the most sexist. For every negative trait they give their women, there's still something positive about them.

I'm not sure the Bechdel Test is useful for anything with long narrative lengths. A surprising number of works do not pass it in any case, but where the narrative is long, it is likely to give details that one expect from the setting. For example, Orihime can be seen in casual conversation about school related subjects with female classmates in plenty of situations (most often with the tomboy and the lesbian).

But it's shonen manga, and so who can really blame him for having no idea how to portray women?

I find the test pretty useless. It is inherently discriminatory against limited point of view narratives: By default, limited PoV conversations would involve the PoV character. If a conversation occurs in which the PoV character isn't a conversant, it is generally with a specific purpose in mind. Thus, if a limited PoV narrative has a male PoV character, then it has a much higher chance of failing the test than a third person omniscient narrative with a male protagonist.

The most obvious demonstration of this flaw is in video games, where it's uncommon for anybody to carry on a conversation with someone other than the player character. Directing a line or two to another character, certainly, but conversation is rare. Thus, if a game features a male player character, then it's very likely to fail the test quite independently of how it treats female characters.

I have read the first nine volumes of Bleach, so far, and I think that Tite Kubo has some strong female characters: Rukia, Rangiku, Yoruichi, Orihimi, Tatsuki, even little Ururu and Ichigo's sisters.
I do think that Orihime is a strong character so far. From what I have read about things that happen later in the series it seems like she might change into a typical damsel in distress, but she has not done that yet.
In short, I have not seen anything to make me think that Kubo is sexist.

Quote:

I have read the first nine volumes of Bleach, so far, and I think that Tite Kubo has some strong female characters: Rukia, Rangiku, Yoruichi, Orihimi, Tatsuki, even little Ururu and Ichigo's sisters. I do think that Orihime is a strong character so far. From what I have read about things that happen later in the series it seems like she might change into a typical damsel in distress, but she has not done that yet. In short, I have not seen anything to make me think that Kubo is sexist.

She gets kidnapped eventually, but I can't say she's the typical damsel waiting to be rescued. She continued to make her own decisions and thus remains active, which is kind of interesting, considering Stockholm Syndrome was lurking right around the corner. There were moments I wanted to slap some sense into her, but to be honest, it would have been more much annoying if she hadn't been affected by her situation.

Also, if there's something else Tite Kubo does well it's diversity. He mixes plenty of different personalities and body shapes. His female characters rarely if ever fall neatly into common categories like 'big-boobed fighter' or 'flat-chested tsundere'. Some look like they do, but he always adds some traits to make them different and unique.

It's to help point out the obvious issue with entertainment media these days: how uncommon it is to just see a female character having a conversation that isn't about a male. If you reverse the test requirements anything and everything could pass.

I wouldn't use the test on videogames that weren't RPGs, because like you said there's very little in terms of dialogue. Comics on the other hand constantly show other scenes not with the first person POV, and so it still stands.

On the other hand there's a common conception that strong character= fighting along the best. Nobody praises non-action characters that heal, manage, or just stand up to won ideals in other way than physical combat. It's often seen in reviews of period pieces, when readers don't understand different standards- for example Rosalie form Lady Oscar it was brave to seek for justice, run from biological mother and have life in own way, but she didn't have a sword, so she's disqualified forever.