View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
GracieLizzy
Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 551
Location: Sunderland, England, UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:36 am
|
|
|
Does this article have to be so heavy with the "this is a sneaky, sneaky OEL release!" if it is a good comic, then it is a good comic.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vikio
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 60
Location: tropical volcano
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:20 pm
|
|
|
The description of the guy "Blank" sounds really interesting and funny! Crazy hormonal teen telling everyone he's a secret agent, and may really be one? Doesn't that just sound like a dream-come-true for most crazy kids? I'm gonna check this out.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kurozen
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:20 pm
|
|
|
Clearly not manga. This is yet further proof that gaijin can NOT draw in the Japanese style.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Key
Moderator
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 18447
Location: Indianapolis, IN (formerly Mimiho Valley)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:28 pm
|
|
|
Pop Mhan was definitely using manga stylistc elements, but he's using his own style, not a pure "Japanese style."
Even besides that, his artistry is still better than a lot of genuine manga-ka out there. He can at least draw well, and I haven't been able to say that about a fair amount of the manga I've read.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Faceman
Joined: 11 Jul 2005
Posts: 300
Location: Boston
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:06 am
|
|
|
Kurozen wrote: | Clearly not manga. This is yet further proof that gaijin can NOT draw in the Japanese style. |
Have you even read the book yet? Besides, they already state it's not manga. Manga-influenced != manga. The author does have a background from well known Western comic companies at least.
Anyway, just because someone's not Japanese doesn't mean they will never be able to draw in the Japanese style. White guys can rap, black guys can play hockey, and there are non-Japanese who can draw manga. Boo to stereotypes.
|
Back to top |
|
|
configspace
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:51 am
|
|
|
You've definitely gotten my interest, the cover art looks nice (curvaceous indeed), but it seems sort of unfair to even bring it up considering the fate of Tokyopop and that this first volume is basically it since 2006.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Key
Moderator
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 18447
Location: Indianapolis, IN (formerly Mimiho Valley)
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:27 am
|
|
|
configspace wrote: | You've definitely gotten my interest, the cover art looks nice (curvaceous indeed), but it seems sort of unfair to even bring it up considering the fate of Tokyopop and that this first volume is basically it since 2006. |
You do realize that you're responding to a four-year-old thread (and review), right?
|
Back to top |
|
|
configspace
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 3717
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:26 pm
|
|
|
Key wrote: |
configspace wrote: | You've definitely gotten my interest, the cover art looks nice (curvaceous indeed), but it seems sort of unfair to even bring it up considering the fate of Tokyopop and that this first volume is basically it since 2006. |
You do realize that you're responding to a four-year-old thread (and review), right? |
haha, no I hadn't realized
this appeared on the sidebar and I thought it was a recent review
|
Back to top |
|
|
|