Forum - View topicNEWS: Vic Mignogna Loses Appeal of Defamation Case, Faces More Attorney's Fees
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
getchman
 He started itPosts: 9134 Location: New Hampshire |
|
||
|
Oh neat, one final kick to the nuts to make it 35 losses instead of 34.
|
|||
|
|||
Top Gun
 Posts: 4789 |
|
||
|
Lol, keep on failing at failing.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr. slicer
Posts: 112 |
|
||
|
Just wondering are there any higher courts in Texas or is this likely that end of the line for Vic to overrun the trial court ruling?
|
|||
|
|||
|
SciasSlash
Posts: 120 |
|
||
|
He could take it to the Texas Supreme Court, but they would have to take the case to begin with. And even if they did, I don't know what he could do differently.
The case is about whether or not accusing him of sexual assault or referring to him as a sexpest is defamation, and it has been proven multiple times with extremely sufficient evidence that there was reasonable grounds to accuse him of sexual misconduct, or suspect him of it. A statement can only be considered defamation if it is provably false, or if there is no reason to believe it is true. Basically, they don't have to prove without a shadow of a doubt that Mignogna did these things, just that they have reason to suspect that he did. The evidence they have of that is pretty airtight. |
|||
|
|||
|
Hongqilim
|
|
||
|
As the uninitiated, I wish to know how fair and transparent are the courts in the US?
|
|||
penguintruth
 Posts: 8500 Location: Penguinopolis |
|
||
|
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Though I'm sure the Vic cultists would disagree.
|
|||
|
|||
|
lossthief
ANN Reviewer
 Posts: 1440 |
|
||
There's not exactly a simple answer to that for ALL courts, but in this particular case basically everything publically available - affidavits, rulings, court transcripts, even recordings of some depositions. |
|||
|
|||
TsukasaElkKite
 Posts: 4015 |
|
||
|
All I’ll say is “sucks to suck”.
|
|||
|
|||
|
JoelBurger
|
|
||
|
I'm sure the losers who gave him $300,000 for legal fees can rest easy knowing it was money well spent.
|
|||
|
BaronViolet
Posts: 234 |
|
||
|
Just when things were looking up for Vic. I really hope he comes out on top.
|
|||
|
|||
|
TheMorry
Posts: 660 |
|
||
|
Victoryyyyyyyy. Serves him right.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Florete
Posts: 381 |
|
||
|
All the Vic stans were saying to let the courts decide, right? So now they'll accept this outcome...right?
|
|||
|
|||
|
BaronViolet
Posts: 234 |
|
||
|
@TheMorry no. If you actually knew the facts you would know that Funimation betrayed Vic and punishing him over false accusations.
|
|||
|
|||
ScruffyKiwi
 Posts: 707 Location: New Zealand |
|
||
OMG there’s still supporters for this idiot around? If you want to know the “facts” all you need to do is read the court depositions. Its there in black and white, including from Vics own mouth! The guy has been a creaper from the get go and it goes way back to his church going days where he used to prey on young naive girls. Last edited by ScruffyKiwi on Sat Aug 20, 2022 4:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
|
|||
GasterTheGreat
 Posts: 41 |
|
||
That's not what defamation suits are about. Winning or losing does not prove guilt or innocence. That's only for criminal trials. Anti-SLAPP laws are all about protecting people's right to freedom of speech against people using litigation and financial burden to silence their critics. Otherwise we'd see a lot of companies, celebrities, and politicans suing people over bad reviews or online insults and trolling which would be a waste of time and money. |
|||
|
|||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group