View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
NefariousPlatypus
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:57 am
|
|
|
I know. Blasphemy. I was so freaking excited. I went in blind cause I didn't wanna have any preconceived notions. (Other than it was gonna be amazing.) Well, it's not amazing.
The pacing was a mess. The movie felt looong. It tried to be a story about the times with WWII, and yet a movie about a guy living through it. Despite its length, it managed to not properly delve into either side in a substantial way and ends up being about...nothing in particular. The story spends way too much time in a lull, and doesn't really come together in a gratifying way. Just felt like highlights of events in someone's life. Loosely strung together, without strong cohesion or proper focus. I know it's supposed to be semi-autobiographical, but damn. There was so much time wasted on banal moments.
Some positives:
Visually beautiful
Awesome sound effects for machines done by vocals/voice-actors
Airplane-porn. (Seriously, the film's kind of a love-letter to planes.)
Amazing & terrifying German guy
The film's set in the real world, but it still had touches that made it feel dreamy and surreal. (Just, more like a realistic and lifelike mundane dream.)
I don't hate it. I just wanted to like it way more than I did.
|
Back to top |
|
|
EricJ
Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Posts: 876
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:36 am
|
|
|
NefariousPlatypus wrote: | The pacing was a mess. The movie felt looong. It tried to be a story about the times with WWII, and yet a movie about a guy living through it. Despite its length, it managed to not properly delve into either side in a substantial way and ends up being about...nothing in particular. The story spends way too much time in a lull, and doesn't really come together in a gratifying way. Just felt like highlights of events in someone's life. Loosely strung together, without strong cohesion or proper focus. I know it's supposed to be semi-autobiographical, but damn. There was so much time wasted on banal moments. |
Yeah, I got the sense from the trailer of someone who was WAY too sentimentally close to his own material, and didn't care because he was retiring and felt he "deserved" to make it, audience be darned.
I keep confusing Miyazaki's fillmography with Akira Kurosawa's, and the exact same complaint could be leveled at Kurosawa's farewell "Madadayo"...What a sentimentally retirement-lulling, self-indulgent "semi-autobiographical" mess without a shred of narrative plot THAT was.
(But you had me at "Airplane porn". That sounds like Miyazaki in his own personal sandbox.)
|
Back to top |
|
|
NefariousPlatypus
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:41 pm
|
|
|
EricJ wrote: |
(But you had me at "Airplane porn". That sounds like Miyazaki in his own personal sandbox.) |
Yeah, you could tell there was immense love and care put into this aspect of the film. That alone makes it worth watching at least once.
Also, I should clarify that the movie does try to focus and be about Jiro and his dream/goal in life. But, the execution was just all over the place. The movie really should have been a book instead of a film.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chagen46
Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 4377
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:26 pm
|
|
|
No comment on Hideki Anno's acting? From what I've heard, it was horrible, and even the Japanese didn't like it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
NefariousPlatypus
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
|
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:36 pm
|
|
|
Chagen46 wrote: | No comment on Hideki Anno's acting? From what I've heard, it was horrible, and even the Japanese didn't like it. |
Totally forgot about this. I didn't know he voiced the protagonist until after finishing the movie. He's obviously an Anime god and it would have made me even more excited so I'm glad I was unaware going in.
I'm not sure how to say this without sounding mean (especially since I admire him so much) but...he had a weird lisp. I think . I don't really speak Japanese, but his voice sounded oddly off.
|
Back to top |
|
|
vanfanel
Joined: 26 Dec 2008
Posts: 1261
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 12:35 pm
|
|
|
Anno's performance was very soft-spoken and unassuming, to the point that I couldn't get into the character's head, and got no sense of there being anything else in there except airplanes. I do want to talk to a native speaker who's seen it, and find out what kind of impression he or she had. To me, Jiro seemed to be drifting through his own life and times as a spectator rather than as a participant, at least whenever he wasn't working.
There were some great scenes here and there; however, the film as a whole just didn't seem to gel into something that had much to say about the issues it raised.
Oh well, there's still "Princess Kaguya" to look forward to!
|
Back to top |
|
|
NefariousPlatypus
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 53
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:43 pm
|
|
|
vanfanel wrote: | Anno's performance was very soft-spoken and unassuming, to the point that I couldn't get into the character's head, and got no sense of there being anything else in there except airplanes. I do want to talk to a native speaker who's seen it, and find out what kind of impression he or she had. To me, Jiro seemed to be drifting through his own life and times as a spectator rather than as a participant, at least whenever he wasn't working.
There were some great scenes here and there; however, the film as a whole just didn't seem to gel into something that had much to say about the issues it raised.
Oh well, there's still "Princess Kaguya" to look forward to! |
Yup, it'd be interesting to see what native speakers thought of Jiro's voice. And yeah it definitely had some great bits in there. Like you said though, it all just doesn't really come together. I feel like Miyazaki gave himself too much free reign.
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtm42
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:28 pm
|
|
|
Wait, that was Hideaki Anno voicing adult Jiro? Holy crap on a stick, I didn't even realise. But it explains so much. Jiro's adult voice was so atrocious I was forced to switch to the English dub, for perhaps the first time ever. Joseph Gordon-Levitt wasn't great but he was at least tolerable.
Seriously, why and how did Anno get the lead role? I'm just completely baffled.
|
Back to top |
|
|
shamisen the great
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:07 pm
|
|
|
dtm42 wrote: |
Seriously, why and how did Anno get the lead role? I'm just completely baffled. |
Aren't he and Miyazaki best buds now or something?
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtm42
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:21 am
|
|
|
Well they must be for Anno to get the lead role over a professionally trained seiyuu.
|
Back to top |
|
|
shamisen the great
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 658
Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:51 am
|
|
|
Yeah, as much as I respect Anno as a director, acting is not amongst his talents.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jl07045
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Posts: 1527
Location: Riga, Latvia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:54 am
|
|
|
dtm42 wrote: | Well they must be for Anno to get the lead role over a professionally trained seiyuu. |
A quote from Carl Horn about their relationship:
Quote: | in Anno's case, the personal relationship is definitely closer and has been expressed on a number of occasions; Miyazaki and Anno took a special plane journey through the Sahara together in the late 1990s in a vintage plane, retracing the route of Antoine de Saint-Exupery (a book was written about their trip). Miyazaki spoke at Anno's wedding, and of course, Anno directed a short film exclusively for the Ghibli Museum. |
That being said, I don't think it's as much pure nepotism, as Miyazaki also thinking that Anno, being the kind of person that he is, might be a good match for that role.
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtm42
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:47 am
|
|
|
jl07045 wrote: | That being said, I don't think it's as much pure nepotism, as Miyazaki also thinking that Anno, being the kind of person that he is, might be a good match for that role. |
Anno is/was a deeply troubled person emotionally and mentally, which is not a criticism so much as an observation (one that I believe is not controversial, given Anno's comments in various interviews about himself). Jiro - at least how he was portrayed in the movie - was a young man whose biggest concern (apart from his sick wife) was lacking the technology to design a truly beautiful airplane. He didn't come across as someone grappling with depression.
I think the biggest problem though is that Anno was fifty-three when he voiced Jiro, and he made no attempt to prevent Jiro from sounding like a fifty-three-year-old man. The voice and character design are so incompatible I couldn't stand it.
If Miyazaki thought that Anno would do a good job - and if he liked Anno's work - then he's off his rocker.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jl07045
Joined: 30 Aug 2011
Posts: 1527
Location: Riga, Latvia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:58 am
|
|
|
That is an observation of Anno circa original Eva. The newer interviews show a more stable person. But what Miyazaki was going for was likely his obsessiveness as a giant robot/ship otaku.
And of course Miyazaki is off his rocker, I don't remeber him ever being on it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|