Forum - View topicNEWS: Crunchyroll Lists Durarara, Chu-Bra Among Its Anime
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blood-
 Bargain Hunter Posts: 24090 |
|
|||
|
Wow, ikillchicken, congratulations on being so telepathic that you know for a fact that when Mr. sickVisionz wrote nobody "actually disagreed with or denied it as being an accurate description" that he specificially wasn't referring to his label of "child porn moe" in that statement. Care to explain how you KNOW that to be the case?
However, let's proceed with your assumption. Here's the part of his post you quoted (including, I note, his child porn label):
I don't recall the show ever saying that any character is 5 years old. If he is referring to Kana, the main character of the series, the wikipedia entry on Kanememo notes she is 13 years old. The show makes clear she is in middle school, so she couldn't be 5. I don't recall the adult pedo female ever stripping any character. She was definitely an aggressive groper. There was an obligatory public bath scene were all the girls naughty bits were covered by steam - I guess that corresponds to his comment about blurred out genitalia. There was no child nudity. There was no "sexual depiction" of children. There was a female adult character who clearly had pedo tendencies, so I can say that part of his description is accurate. I encourage anybody who is interested enough to check out Kanememo for themselves to see if it is "child porn." I can say all I want, Mr. sickVisionz can say all he wants, but in the end the proof is in the pudding. |
||||
|
||||
ikillchicken
 Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
|
|||
Well, it's pretty heavilly implied by his wording. Saying he provided a 'description' would usually mean more than simply calling it child porn. But no, I don't know for a fact it's what he meant obviously. However, as you yourself recognized, with your interpretation his comments are most obviously untrue to the point of downright making no sense. Therefore, it is rational to assume he meant it the other way which does make sense. (Of course, then you miss a lovely opportunity to talk down to him and imply he's stupid for making no sense which is much easier than trying your best to accurately understand him and formulate a real response). Anyway though, yeah. If you're correct and his description is so inaccurate then that is a pretty valid point. I think it's probably one you ought to have made initially instead of focusing on the specific term 'child-porn'. |
||||
|
||||
|
animeboy12
Posts: 160 |
|
|||
|
What's up with everyone trying to play arm chair physiologist analyzing and twisting everyone posts just to come up with some BS that's supports their own opinion. I mean c'mon there's only so much crap you can pull out of a post that may/may not have much thought process behind them.
Anyway kanamemo is definitely not child pornography, or not just child pornography if you Haruka interactions with Saki are played for sexual arousal, quite frankly I thought is was just for humor but that's just me. But for the people for label kanamemo as child pornography and aren't compelled to do something about.....well IMO that's kinda messed up. I don't care what point your trying to prove, child pornography is not a phrase you throw around lightly |
||||
|
||||
|
ikillchicken
Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
|
|||
If you're going to accuse me of twisting someone's words you had better explain in detail. How have I misrepresented his comment? You make it all sound so malicious. Sadly, language can be ambiguous and sometimes it is unclear what a person is saying. When that happens some analysis of their comments may be necessary.
I'd argue that what's 'messed up' is trying to control what others can and cannot watch. As disgusting as it may be, so long it is just animated child porn it is not hurting anyone and therefore I tolerate it's right to exist. (I'm speaking generally here. Not about kanamemo.) |
||||
|
||||
vashfanatic
 Posts: 3492 Location: Back stateside |
|
|||
|
So.... who wants to drop the never-goes-anywhere porn debate and go back to arguing over "r" vs. "l" again?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Blood-
Bargain Hunter Posts: 24090 |
|
|||
Kanememo is NOT Chird Poln!
|
||||
|
||||
Kirikiri23
 Posts: 130 |
|
|||
|
any other examples?
I'm looking for something to do tonight |
||||
|
||||
|
Josh7289
Posts: 1252 |
|
|||
|
I hate moe.
If the only intention of your post is to insult another user then don't bother posting. |
||||
|
||||
|
Kirikiri23
Posts: 130 |
|
|||
I don't understand? |
||||
|
||||
nadir-seen-fire
 Posts: 90 |
|
|||
That's because CR primarily sticks with blog postings on new simulcasts rather than old series they have licensed, and moe is the current standard of the industry. heh...
|
||||
|
||||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group