×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
NEWS: Rurouni Kenshin Creator Nobuhiro Watsuki Fined 200,000 Yen for Possession of Child Porn


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gemnist



Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1761
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:32 pm Reply with quote
ONLY $1,900? Geez, I could pay that with my own non-family-related money!

Honestly, I think he needed a jail sentence, at which point he can resume the current chapter of Rurouni Kenshin. And if he did it again, throw him back in the big house, give Rurouni Kenshin to someone else, and cut ALL of Watsuki's royalties.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gatherum



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 773
Location: Aurora CO
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:32 pm Reply with quote
Eh. Honestly, that's fair. Personally, there are certain things I can't ignore in either the artist or the art enough to enjoy either. On the other hand, I also can't blame someone who went out and bought, say, a Rurouni Kenshin set, and continues to enjoy that set in spite of being made aware of this new information regarding the author.

There's plenty in comedy and memes that still get me to laugh in spite of myself, even though it's rather fucked up. Given the latter, I choose not to spread it around, but yeah...even I can't be perfect all the time. I also have a music library chock full of black and death metal releases, and I'm sure there's at least one or two that managed to pass under my decency radar somehow. Hell, I even own some of the Japanese import releases of the Rurouni Kenshin films and OVA's.

Still, while I understand the cynicism associated with giving shit up ("You probably weren't that in to it in the first place"), I also contend that one's principles can and do kick in when faced with new information or realisations. I used to really like The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya, and was this close to ordering that ultimate Blu-ray collection that dropped a couple of years ago. I really enjoy the series, plot-wise; it's very interesting. By then, however, I had come to recognise Haruhi Suzumiya herself as an out-right abusive and selfish character to whom Kyon never quite stands up in any adequate fashion (and whose short-comings tend to be softened up and explained away by the ever-worshipful Koizumi when he tries). I'll admit that it was a downer, but I ultimately said, "No. If this were a few years ago, when I was younger and stupider and didn't know what I know now, I might have taken this plunge, but I honestly can't do it now." So I passed it up and eventually gave away the DVD's I had bought previously.

Similarly, I probably won't invest in a new box of Rurouni Kenshin if one ever comes out, and may sell or relinquish the aforementioned imports. They might be worth something and I could use the extra money, anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
ARC-1300



Joined: 06 Feb 2012
Posts: 364
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:40 pm Reply with quote
Cam0 wrote:
Gatherum wrote:
"The art should be separated from the artist maaannn!"


It's a personal choice. You don't have to like the artist to like their work.


I’ve always held to that belief. But nope, people immediately think, apologist. I guess that does make us ones, and at worst paedophiles ourselves?? Even though the logic itself is inhumanly crazy.

I really do feel like the art itself is an entity all on its own. Please don’t make it suffer for the one boneheaded-ness of it’s creator.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michie_



Joined: 21 Nov 2017
Posts: 9
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:43 pm Reply with quote
I read a lot of comments on social media claiming Watsuki should be banished from society or even executed but do we know what was on the tapes?

If it really was hardcore child porn the judge wouldn't have given Watsuki "a slap on the wrist".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CrowLia



Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 5528
Location: Mexico
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:04 pm Reply with quote
dark_bozu wrote:

I think that UNLESS he done ANY harm to ANY minors DIRECTLY this isn't crime. I agree that CP is disgusting, but a criminal scum is the one that makes those videos and distribute them.


Quote:
Like I said, the people that shoot CP and distribute it to people with mental health issue are real scums and criminals, that should be punished. They are exploiting weakness and illness that those people had and they are the ones that violate children rights.


And why, pray tell, do you think anyone would want to shoot photographs and videos of children being sexually abused? Because someone pays for them. If no one bought child porn, no one would be selling it. Get a grip. Watsuki's money directly funded the sexual abuse of children. There is no excuse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
CrownKlown



Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 1762
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:38 pm Reply with quote
Xe4 wrote:
Apologies for getting off topic, mods. Thanks for cleaning up the thread.
dark_bozu wrote:

You said it YOURSELF, that "pedophilia is a mental health issue" so how come that watching and owning child porn is not a mental health issue? It is! Beause unless you're a pedophile you won't buy and watch CP.

Like I said, the people that shoot CP and distribute it to people with mental health issue are real scums and criminals, that should be punished. They are exploiting weakness and illness that those people had and they are the ones that violate children rights.

Again, having a mental illness is not an excuse to commit a crime. Pedophiles are not helpless against their instincts, they're making a deliberate choice to download or buy and masturbate to children being sexually abused or put in compromising situations. By doing so they are either directly or indirectly supporting those who do harm children.

If people are having those urges there are many channels of help that don't involve having kids get hurt, but they choose not to use them. Thus, I have absolutely zero sympathy for someone who deliberately views that kind of material.


Dude no offense, but do you have even the slightest grasp of the legal system of your own country let alone Japan. Even if your entire understanding of law came from day time tv, you would know that yes mental illness is an excuse for crime and its literally used all the time as a defense, although how often its successful is another matter.

The insanity defense often used in murder cases, is exactly this, a mental illness used to defend the act of murder. Even when it comes to sexual transgressions, part of the reason that Stanford swimmer got of as easy as he did, besides a crappy judge, is because he used "alcohol impaired his mental function" excuse. Hell even that kid in Texas got off for "afluenza" aka his up bringing altered his mental state to such a degree he could not be held accountable for his actions. Point is anything that can impede your mental state whether an illness or some outside influence can in fact be "used" as a defense by the laws of pretty much every major nation

I don't agree with Japan's lite stance on the matter, but this and that are two different things.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G S Palmer



Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Posts: 246
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:56 pm Reply with quote
^Well, I think that's actually more of "an excuse not to get punished for a crime" rather than "an excuse to commit a crime", technically. There is a difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gatherum



Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 773
Location: Aurora CO
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:22 pm Reply with quote
CrowLia wrote:
And why, pray tell, do you think anyone would want to shoot photographs and videos of children being sexually abused? Because someone pays for them. If no one bought child porn, no one would be selling it. Get a grip. Watsuki's money directly funded the sexual abuse of children. There is no excuse.


This is actually a very important point to consider when faced with the art versus artist debate. While no one is trying to tell you that you are an evil human being on the same level as the artist for buying their product(s) and therefore practically/monetarily supporting/enabling them (which is everything in a capitalist society), there is an argument to be made that it is irresponsible and potentially indicative of someone who is willfully ignorant. How far up the tree you want to take this perspective is up to you; I'll offer an example:

There exists a death metal band called Disma, and they are signed to Profound Lore Records. I know of them because Profound Lore have advertised them to me via news letter before. I once considered giving them a listen and, if I liked them enough, a buy. However, I found out in short order that one of their members, Craig Pillard, has a known (recent and even current) history of nazi sympathy and anti-semitism, and has his own side project called Sturmführer, whose third album pretty much speaks for itself.

Disma itself, far as I can tell, is not a nazi-themed project, but royalties generated via purchase of their albums will go, at least in part, to Craig Pillard; therefore, I cannot, in good conscience, invest in Disma because I do not want to enable a known nazi or sympathiser.

On the other hand, I will and have bought other albums from other artists--like Abyssal, Agalloch, Altar of Plagues, Dysrhythmia, Impetuous Ritual, SubRosa, and Vaura, none of whom have this problem as far as I know--signed to Profound Lore, the label itself not subscribing to any particular ideology. A very hard leftist might tell me that by buying from Profound Lore, I am supporting a label which allows bands with nazi members on its roster, and to be transparent, I do admit to wishing that either they or the rest of Disma would take a firmer stance on this. But let me admit something else to you: It's almost impossible to completely sanitise your consumption, especially in a capitalistic, information-driven society such as this. I don't have a particular connection to Profound Lore beyond brand recognition (they generally release some damned good shit), but I don't feel the need to forego all of the other aforementioned bands and my support for them just because of Disma.

So, I guess the point is to attempt to minimise your foot print in this matter when you know and when you can. I now know that Nobuhiro Watsuki, the author of Rurouni Kenshin, has used his earned capital to deal in CP; therefore, it is no longer in my interest to support Rurouni Kenshin and his other works, which support him, which potentially supports the CP economy--at least until I see something that convinces me that he will not do this shit again.


Last edited by Gatherum on Wed Feb 28, 2018 1:48 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Chrono1000





PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:42 pm Reply with quote
CrownKlown wrote:
The insanity defense often used in murder cases, is exactly this, a mental illness used to defend the act of murder. Even when it comes to sexual transgressions, part of the reason that Stanford swimmer got of as easy as he did, besides a crappy judge, is because he used "alcohol impaired his mental function" excuse. Hell even that kid in Texas got off for "afluenza" aka his up bringing altered his mental state to such a degree he could not be held accountable for his actions. Point is anything that can impede your mental state whether an illness or some outside influence can in fact be "used" as a defense by the laws of pretty much every major nation
I am horrified by that idea but within a decade the ACLU will probably be using pedophilia as a defense in court. Just a few years ago they defended NAMBLA. The western legal system has become so corrupted that at times I wonder if lawyers misunderstood the term Devil's advocate because they aren't supposed to be advocating for evil.
Back to top
Xe4



Joined: 04 May 2015
Posts: 96
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:52 pm Reply with quote
CrownKlown wrote:

Dude no offense, but do you have even the slightest grasp of the legal system of your own country let alone Japan. Even if your entire understanding of law came from day time tv, you would know that yes mental illness is an excuse for crime and its literally used all the time as a defense, although how often its successful is another matter.

The insanity defense often used in murder cases, is exactly this, a mental illness used to defend the act of murder. Even when it comes to sexual transgressions, part of the reason that Stanford swimmer got of as easy as he did, besides a crappy judge, is because he used "alcohol impaired his mental function" excuse. Hell even that kid in Texas got off for "afluenza" aka his up bringing altered his mental state to such a degree he could not be held accountable for his actions. Point is anything that can impede your mental state whether an illness or some outside influence can in fact be "used" as a defense by the laws of pretty much every major nation

I don't agree with Japan's lite stance on the matter, but this and that are two different things.

Ok, first off you completely ignored the context of my quote. I was never talking about the use of a mental unfitness plea in a legal sense. In fact I was strictly arguing that morally and ethically having a mental illness is not an excuse to commit a crime. In essence, I don't care that your attraction to children is a mentally illness, that's not an excuse to masturbate to children being abused. The legality of the matter had absolutely nothing to do with it.

Secondly, mental illness related defenses are actually very rare. The account for less than 1% of all defenses and when they are used they rarely work <30% of the time. In the very rare case they are used and successful the defendant will often face some sort of alternate sentance, such as being forced into a mental health hospital. You'll see them on the news and in dramas frequently because the absurdity of the plea genetates headlines.

Third, as far as I know Watsuki never used a mental illness plea, so the whole point is kind of moot here. I was simply responding to the user who said the fact that the author was I'll and that he didn't physically film the children being abused didn't make what he did ok, which the poster seemed to imply it did. That's it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chrono1000





PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:16 am Reply with quote
Xe4 wrote:
Secondly, mental illness related defenses are actually very rare. The account for less than 1% of all defenses and when they are used they rarely work <30% of the time.
That was from a 1991 study about the insanity defense. Neither of the cases he mentioned used the insanity defense and what he is referring to is using a circumstance or mental illness as a mitigating factor. A mitigating factor can be used to lessen the sentence.
Back to top
wheelz1993



Joined: 28 Feb 2018
Posts: 5
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:58 am Reply with quote
it's really disappointing to see so many people have thoughts about pedophilia and child porn that are anything more complicated then EW YUCK STOP

Im not shocked at all by that made in aybss stuff tho.. i just did a book club style watch of it to guest on a podcast i did with some friends of mine and found the series very off putting for related reasons.. they make like 4 mentions of stringing the kids up naked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Catsplay



Joined: 24 Sep 2015
Posts: 381
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 1:12 am Reply with quote
wheelz1993 wrote:
it's really disappointing to see so many people have thoughts about pedophilia and child porn that are anything more complicated then EW YUCK STOP

Im not shocked at all by that made in aybss stuff tho.. i just did a book club style watch of it to guest on a podcast i did with some friends of mine and found the series very off putting for related reasons.. they make like 4 mentions of stringing the kids up naked


Made In Abyss has some mild loli and shota "Fanservice" but it's by no means child porn and nor should it ever be compared to as such. There is a huge difference between fiction and reality, and Made In Abyss tells a really amazing story with well developed characters, the mild jokes don't take away from that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wheelz1993



Joined: 28 Feb 2018
Posts: 5
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 1:25 am Reply with quote
Catsplay wrote:
wheelz1993 wrote:
it's really disappointing to see so many people have thoughts about pedophilia and child porn that are anything more complicated then EW YUCK STOP

Im not shocked at all by that made in aybss stuff tho.. i just did a book club style watch of it to guest on a podcast i did with some friends of mine and found the series very off putting for related reasons.. they make like 4 mentions of stringing the kids up naked


Made In Abyss has some mild loli and shota "Fanservice" but it's by no means child porn and nor should it ever be compared to as such. There is a huge difference between fiction and reality, and Made In Abyss tells a really amazing story with well developed characters, the mild jokes don't take away from that.


the show is well made.. but you dont get accused of child porn all willy nilly.. if it truly is just some big rumor.. then great.. you can also like the show outside of that.. but if the creator is into that stuff.. then i hope he gets what he deserves
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BadNewsBlues



Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 6236
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 2:01 am Reply with quote
Chrono1000 wrote:
I am horrified by that idea but within a decade the ACLU will probably be using pedophilia as a defense in court. Just a few years ago they defended NAMBLA. The western legal system has become so corrupted that at times I wonder if lawyers misunderstood the term Devil's advocate because they aren't supposed to be advocating for evil.


Hate to break this to you but choosing to defend people even those who may be unequivocally guilty isn't really a sign of corruption.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group