Forum - View topicNEWS: Dragon Ball Movie to Film This Year for 2008 Release
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hon'ya-chan
 Posts: 973 |
|
|||||
Well duh, because they at least managed to stuff alot of things from the comics while making it good for the masses. Thought why they didn't use the Black Cat as one of the villians.... After looking at the pics of the stars vast to the movie......
|
||||||
|
||||||
tygerchickchibi
 Posts: 1472 |
|
|||||
...so...does that mean you enjoyed the movie? I know a lot of people complained about the 3rd one. And Black Cat...ugh.... |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Xanas
Posts: 2058 |
|
|||||
|
I don't know about him but I enjoyed it. Too many complainers around IMO. Adaptations by their nature are going to be different, and it's not that they go wrong by being different, it's that fandom goes wrong by expecting more similarity than is reasonable.
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
OmegaGenesis
Posts: 1 |
|
|||||
Hahaha everyone is Daniel Zelter anyways: Here is mine Goku=Stephen Chow himself!? (turns dragonball the movie into a funny movie) Chichi=Zhang Ziyi Vegeta=Donnie Yen Bulma=Brittany Murphy Kame-sennin=Eddie Chan(from Dragon Ball: The Magic Begins)the perfect Kame. 
Nappa=Bill Goldberg Piccolo=cant find any suitable Gohan=cant find any suitable Or everyone could be Stephen Chow. ah that will be a good laugh. Stephen Chow plays everyone. haha now thats worth watching |
||||||
|
||||||
|
GATSU
Posts: 15445 |
|
|||||
|
Steven:
The irony is that with all the money and detail, the robots looked crappier than their outsourced 2-d counterparts.
Who the hell doesn't know about this series by now? Xanas:
But the difference is, in spite of not being 100% faithful to the source material, LOTR was actually good. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Hon'ya-chan
Posts: 973 |
|
|||||
Up untill 2. 3rd one i have no idea where they went with that one. Sandman? "Oooo, I can be abrasive you!! SANDBLAST!! Oooo!!!"
Better than Sandman.
2 hour long ebay/GM/dell/xbox/moutain dew commercial |
||||||
|
||||||
|
tygerchickchibi
Posts: 1472 |
|
|||||
Agreed. Pros and cons, oh well.... xD My whole thing was that I hope that if they ever show Black Cat...it doesn't end up kinda like the whole Elektra/Catwoman ordeal. >.>; |
||||||
|
||||||
Vortextk
 Posts: 892 Location: Orlando, Fl |
|
|||||
A year and a half to film? First, I think you mean to finish, not to film. Lord of the rings is one of the biggest projects ever and it took what, 3 years to film three incredibly long movies with a cast and crew the size of a town. 9 months for everything should be fine. And for the people bashing transformers, the makers might have trouble hearing you over the constant wave crashes of money. Good or not, it sold. You want to talk about bad adaptations, lets talk about Uwe Boll. Transformers isn't even in the same galaxy. |
||||||
|
||||||
firedragon54738
 Posts: 3113 Location: wisconsin |
|
|||||
|
this movie is going to suck like 90% of hollywood make suck there going to be to much cg and it was a bad idea to make this movie live action in the first place
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
tygerchickchibi
Posts: 1472 |
|
|||||
FIXED. =D |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Hon'ya-chan
Posts: 973 |
|
|||||
The difference is, the Elektra and Catwoman Movies (and to an extent, the second Lara Croft Movie) was the female leads as being one of the factors in why the films failed. Of course, the laundry list of charges is numerous. From poor scripts to just audiences not liking the characters. Dunno about Elektra in the Daredevil movie. But I think Catwoman in the second Batman film was accepted okay, as Pffier played her smoothly. As it stands, none of the Spiderman villains have had any planned spin-off movies. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
fighterholic
Posts: 9193 |
|
|||||
We have another GATSU in our midst!! 
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar  Posts: 16954 |
|
|||||
The reason for Sandman and the Green Goblin is because they wanted to use villains from the original comics. Ya know, the original ones that helped get everything going. Raimi didn't want to use newer villains and was even opposed to Venom at first. He relented on that I assume due to Venom's sheer popularity and to be fair. But the original goal was always to use original villains from the old comics. And I think comparing the success of the Spiderman movies to any aspect of Dragon Ball period, let alone the movie, is not fair. I mean how much history and time does Spiderman have under it's belt? Regardless of the quality of the movies it was of course going to do well. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Steventheeunuch
|
|
|||||
Crappier by the armchair expert GATSU standard which I'm not exactly going to trust since you're a complete wipe.
Know about, sure, they know about it, but the finer details, or even the larger ones, do not properly convey in what would be a 'realistic' movie. |
||||||
|
Hon'ya-chan
Posts: 973 |
|
|||||
Nah, not enough finesse. GATSU at least manages to be coherent, unlike this loudmouth. |
||||||
|
||||||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group