Forum - View topic

INTEREST: Manga Editor Provides Glimpse of Lolicon Magazine's Standards

Slow news day, huh ANN?

Even pedos have standards I guess. Either 8 or 9 is still way, way, way, way, way too young to be considered in such a way. Either way you would face more severe punishment than doing the same thing with say a 14 year old. Although as long as their pursuit is limited to magazines, I guess it's better than molestation but still really disgusting. Rather, I could not fathom finding such things appealing, though I imagine it's not something they chose. Ultimately, they aren't monsters, just people who need help before they hurt someone.

Most of the appeal is the cuteness, not the age itself.
Real kids usually aren't as cute.
Basically the same for hentai vs real porn.

Paulo27 wrote:

Most of the appeal is the cuteness, not the age itself. Real kids usually aren't as cute. Basically the same for hentai vs real porn.

Considering it's an erotic magazine, I think they are finding the kids the wrong kind of cute, as in the way a teenager would refer to someone of their preferred gender they liked, especially in a physical way. If you find small children cute, that's fine. Fairly normal in fact. If you want to look at pictures of cute kids, that's fine, if a bit weird depending on the amount and intensity. Where it becomes unfathomable is when those kids are naked or in sexual situations, as they would in an erotic magazine.