Forum - View topicThe X Button - Now Showing
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chagen46
Posts: 4377 |
|
|||||||||||
You heard it here, folks! Queer characters automatically make a story not serious! Ugh. |
||||||||||||
darkchibi07
Posts: 5511 |
|
|||||||||||
That was more of a spinoff sequel type, not so much part of the mainline series though, right? I guess what gets to me is how backwards the playable cast is compared to XIII especially since it gave the opportunity to even have a lead female. Now that chance is seemingly squandered and the series looks "bad" thanks to Toriyama's direction. |
||||||||||||
strawberry-kun
Posts: 306 |
|
|||||||||||
I see this thrown around a lot, but it's not a comparable situation. X-2 is a spinoff and not a mainline title despite me including it earlier, and it's really not comparable when you consider the rarity of female protagonists in gaming in general. It's practically a requirement for AAA games to star a male protagonist. Final Fantasy has been one of the few franchises that hasn't shied away from female characters, so this feels like a step back. Last edited by strawberry-kun on Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||||||||
Fedora-san
Posts: 464 |
|
|||||||||||
ikillchicken's two posts seem to suggest there is a false bifurcation afoot. Something is either unapologetic tripe without any merit, or it's a aspiring work of art free from nonconformist attributes. In actuality, most things are probably somewhere in the middle. To say the Metal Gear series is either of those does it a disservice. It has serious moments and themes, but also is extremely schlocky. Routinely breaking the fourth wall by informing the player not to use auto-fire controllers, Snake assuring Raiden he'll be fine because he has an infinite ammo headband. All the bosses are over-the-top, and the series has gone down the supernatural road with ghosts and spirits and the parody road with photo shoots of a lot of the major female supporting cast. To call Metal Gear Solid a serious series simply because it can deal with serious themes would be to me the same as calling One Piece, or Naruto a serious series because they also deal with serious themes. Japan generally loves to mix the two together. You can be dealing with the horrors of war and watching your comrades-in-arms dying around you one moment, then the next you're watching Naruto turn into a harem of men or farting in his opponents face to win a match. We can recount tragic stories of Otacon telling us how he was raped, and then see Johnny have a diarrhea dump in his pants and run around looking for a bathroom tripping over himself. In that regard, complaints about a woman in a bikini seem quaint by comparison. Fart jokes, supernatural villains, and fourth-wall breaking aren't enough to ruin a serious story, but a woman's cleavage (something we've had in every game before this) is? It seems really odd.
We've had female leads in Final Fantasy already, no chance was "squandered" due to Toriyama allegedly making the series look "bad", whatever that's supposed to mean. |
||||||||||||
Shippoyasha
Posts: 459 |
|
|||||||||||
I disagree, strawberry-kun. You don't make a certain story and weigh the entirety of gaming as to why you can't make an all male case in a game. Also, Versus-13 (FF15's former title) was originally made to be a spinoff of the FF13 line of games. Also, FFX-2 is a mainline game and it is not a gimped game at all.
Again, weighing all of gaming to what a single project wants to accomplish isn't fair. You can't just weigh things on a scale that if you don't check off a list of representation, it's 'regressive'. It doesn't work that way. |
||||||||||||
ikillchicken
Posts: 7272 Location: Vancouver |
|
|||||||||||
I in no way presented the false dilemma that you're accusing me of here. My point was simple: If a game is nothing but dumb pseudo-porn then I think that's fine. Some extreme outliers that are just trying to be that aren't an issue. Rather, it's all the other stuff that has no business pulling this crap. It doesn't matter whether MGS is the opposite extreme or just "in the middle". The fact that all the games "in the middle" do this is precisely what I take issue with. That's when it becomes a trend and becomes problematic. That's my whole point. Disagree if you want but please actually disagree with something I've said and stop this weak attempt to misrepresent my stance on the matter.
Actually, most of that shit you just listed does ruin the story in my opinion. Kojima's reliance on juvenile crap has always been why I'm lukewarm at best on the series. But in any case, "Ruining the story" is not what is at issue here. Contributing to a tide of horrid representations of women in games is the problem. Those other things, while dumb, do not do that. Hence, there is nothing inconsistent about my position. |
||||||||||||
Chrno2
Posts: 6172 Location: USA |
|
|||||||||||
That's what I'd think. I mean a bunch of guys in a car and a brooding prince meeting some cute blonde girl for possible romance. Sounds like female recipe for story narrative to me. I mean look at the gorgeous GUYS!!! But man this game better be good I mean, it's been years since we heard anything and the 2015 date is a long way away. It has a TBA date of 12/15 on Amazon for pre-orders but I'm sure something could change by Spring or Summer. |
||||||||||||
configspace
Posts: 3717 |
|
|||||||||||
I for one would've like to see this extra-erotic version he originally wanted. Damn the mainstream for holding the mans' libido back! While other game engines highlight their features with bigger explosions and effects, anyone remember the "wet t-shirt technology" he highlighted with his next-gen Fox Engine?
Seriously, that's actually pretty tough to do, lol.
I never thought the resemblance to Snake Plissken before, but that's definitely it! |
||||||||||||
strawberry-kun
Posts: 306 |
|
|||||||||||
Firstly, I never said that they weren't allowed to make any game they want. They are free to do just that. That does not mean that they are free from criticism. Secondly, using that logic, you can't criticize any individual game for any problems that the industry has. Thirdly, I meant more that it was a step back in variety for the Final Fantasy franchise rather than gaming in general. Fourthly, I have yet to see a good reason why Final Fantasy XV is a no girls allowed clubhouse. The only reason against it is that the game's focus on brotherly bonds. Okay? And you can't have that focus with any kind of female party members present? It sounds like a stupid reason to me.
It used to be. It no longer is. They were also planning on using a more Kingdom Hearts-like Action RPG battle system. Things change.
I never said it was a gimped game. I said it's not a mainline title which it isn't. The mainline games are 1-15. X-2 is a spin-off, or a sequel if you prefer, of X.
Again, I more meant in terms of the Final Fantasy franchise specifically. It would take more than that to mean a step back in gaming in general. I should have been more clear. And what I said above applies to this as well. |
||||||||||||
Shippoyasha
Posts: 459 |
|
|||||||||||
Okay. You are free to criticize away. But it just seems to be hopping aboard the latest way of making everything tinted in a modern day gender wars to me. It's been the hot topic in gaming that's for sure. I'm not saying people aren't allowed to criticize. It just sounds condemning without any recourse. It's just 'regressive, it's bad, the end'. That doesn't really sound like something people can discuss things around. And not sure why it's suddenly a 'backwards step' when FF games have always been open to having female protagonists. It's not like they're making a statement that they won't have female protags. FF13 was distinctly Lightning's trilogy to boot. Also, the game will have pretty important female characters as plot important characters. I honestly don't see how it's 'regressive' whether they have all female or all male representation. I don't think it's fair just to say 'it doesn't have so and so' and just check it off the list and it's suddenly 'regressive'. I think that doesn't really leave any room for interpretation unless you are so dead set on seeing it as regressive. That's fine if you think that way. But that just sounds like speaking in buzzwords. And I am not sure how it's regressive if they choose a certain direction for a game. I don't believe doing so is automatically sending some politicized message like 'it's a boys club now'. That's just an incredible level of very negative, politicized projection on it. It's borderline conspiratorial. |
||||||||||||
strawberry-kun
Posts: 306 |
|
|||||||||||
I'm just sick of playing as guys all the time. Like I said earlier, I'm sure it sounds weird, but I like to play as female characters.
Eh, it's just people having different opinions. I think the all male cast is bad. I doubt anyone could convince me otherwise. Others feel differently. It's just one of those subjects that people get kinda crazy about where neither side is likely to budge.
That's exactly the problem for me. Final Fantasy has nearly always had a varied cast. Most of my favorite characters in the franchise are female. That's why it's so disappointing for me.
That we'll likely see rarely enough and won't get nearly as much focus as the bros.
Like I said, I see it differently. Final Fantasy has been a series that has had mixed casts for every mainline game since the first one. This one doesn't. To me, it's understandable why people would be frustrated about that.
You can ignore my boys club comment if you like. It was hyperbole. I did not mean for it to be taken seriously. |
||||||||||||
Hunter Sopko
Posts: 259 |
|
|||||||||||
Not for nothing, but am I the only one who thought of this when seeing the FF15 trailer for the first time?
If not, too late. You can't unsee it. |
||||||||||||
Shippoyasha
Posts: 459 |
|
|||||||||||
I love playing as female characters too. And I get a huge share of doing that with Japanese/Indie games and even some western games where traditionally, we get a lot of variety in that department with point and clicks. I don't think there's any danger of edging out female characters at all. Especially not by Final Fantasy.
I think opinions are valid. I just think it'll be a hard sell to say it's 'regressive' when the series has always been amazing with female character representation and it's more to do with making a core character team that's more brotherhood centric. I would think it'll be the same way if they centered it around sisterhood.
I get that, but I think it's a little unfair to say they're pushing gaming back or anything. That's a little too harsh. Again, they will be featuring some pretty important female characters in the storytelling, so it's not like it'll be dudes only. Not to mention the game might even get a continuation and we'll see more characters join in.
Fair enough. I can see where the critique comes from. I just don't think Square Enix is making a statement like they are pushing female characters away from their game. You have to admit, that there's some things as sisterhood/brotherhood that is unique in their monosex dynamics. Sure it isn't like having a sitcom or a TV show with a myriad cast of different genders, ages, race, but the brotherhood/sisterhood mingling is something that happens often. I think the important thing is that they intend to make a 'road trip' feel of it so I think that's where it plays into it. Also, I hear FF1 was actually an all male cast, though people had some interpretation about the gender of character classes like White Mage, though to make it more confusing, WM became a female character in the PSP remake. |
||||||||||||
YotaruVegeta
Posts: 1061 Location: New York |
|
|||||||||||
"I can't wait for the series to explain that"
Nanomachines. isn't that how most of the crazy supernatural stuff was explained in MGS? |
||||||||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group