View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
v1cious
Joined: 31 Dec 2002
Posts: 6230
Location: Houston, TX
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:55 am
|
|
|
doesn't media blasters already distribute hentai?
i can't believe there's a market for retro porn
|
Back to top |
|
|
Serge
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 162
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:02 am
|
|
|
v1cious wrote: | doesn't media blasters already distribute hentai?
i can't believe there's a market for retro porn |
Exactly, why not stick to their normal routine of releasiing Hentai and Anime?
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Silva
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 35
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:08 am
|
|
|
v1cious wrote: | doesn't media blasters already distribute hentai?
i can't believe there's a market for retro porn |
Oh, but there is. There's a HUGE market for such stuff. And there's not many companies that can get to sell those movies.
It's actually kind of cool, but I think this'll hurt their reputation.
|
Back to top |
|
|
mangajunky
Company Representative
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 72
Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:32 am
|
|
|
Kitty Media is responsible for the Hentai and the 70's classic erotica. The Yaoi stuff is published through Kitty Media as well.
|
Back to top |
|
|
tropical_kit
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 87
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:56 am
|
|
|
I don't think it's too strange, since Media Blasters already releases Asian live-action stuff as well as cult cinema offerings. This is another niche market for them, and likely a profitable one.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsevakis
Former ANN Editor in Chief
Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Posts: 1685
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:17 pm
|
|
|
Never, ever underestimate the market for porn.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nani?
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 632
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:44 pm
|
|
|
It's good for Media Blasters.
It gives them another steady stream........of income. That means hopefully that they'll be able to massage more titles out of Japan.
It's good for Media Blasters so it should be good for us.
Oh Yeeeeeees.
All the Best,
Nani?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10461
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:35 pm
|
|
|
Serge wrote: | Exactly, why not stick to their normal routine of releasiing Hentai and Anime? |
Media Blasters isn't exclusively an anime company. Kitty and Anime Works are their anime labels. They also release live action movies under the Tokyo Shock and Shriek Show labels.
-t
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChibiGoku
Joined: 29 May 2004
Posts: 686
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:51 pm
|
|
|
tempest wrote: |
Serge wrote: | Exactly, why not stick to their normal routine of releasiing Hentai and Anime? |
Media Blasters isn't exclusively an anime company. Kitty and Anime Works are their anime labels. They also release live action movies under the Tokyo Shock and Shriek Show labels.
-t |
Not to mention, Media Blasters released Invader Zim.
|
Back to top |
|
|
marie-antoinette
Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 4136
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:17 pm
|
|
|
"In volatile market, only stable investment is porn!"
(yeah...I couldn't resist)
|
Back to top |
|
|
Starwind Amada
Joined: 26 Sep 2004
Posts: 981
Location: Easton, PA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:46 pm
|
|
|
Great, so now the later volumes of OMG TV are gonna have ads for Passion Cove and Lusty Confessions or whatever.
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkTenshi90
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 440
Location: Nebraska
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:07 pm
|
|
|
oO; great, now I bet somehow anti-fans will get onto our case more about Anime being pure porno.
Most likely not. I would laugh if this were to happen though. Kinda like when someone says anime's porn, I laugh. I gave up on explaining.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mohawk52
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:07 pm
|
|
|
Those titles should be like classic art now, as most of the "stars" are either old wrinklies, or dead by drugs, AIDS, or both by now.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|