View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Dejiko
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 276
Location: Holland (between Great Britain and Germany)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:21 am
|
|
|
Hmm... I'd better hunt down those final volumes in case no-one's going to do a reprint or an own version of this title
|
Back to top |
|
|
guyverfanboy
Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Location: Watchin anime
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:32 am
|
|
|
Good thing I already own all of Tokyopop's run of Marmalade Boy seeing as how I am not very fond of Viz.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10461
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:43 pm
|
|
|
guyverfanboy wrote: | Good thing I already own all of Tokyopop's run of Marmalade Boy seeing as how I am not very fond of Viz. |
Re-read the article. Viz does not have Marmalade Boy.
-t
|
Back to top |
|
|
TiredGamer
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:41 pm
|
|
|
Whether Viz has the license or not is completely besides the point here. The big news should be that Viz's parents just roughed up Tokyopop. I'm too lazy right now to go hunt down what other Shuensha/Shogakakun licenses Tokyopop currently has, but this could be the start of an interesting "shakedown".
|
Back to top |
|
|
holl.e.rama
Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Posts: 102
Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 8:53 pm
|
|
|
Yeah, I heard that Marmalade Boy was going to be licensed by Del Rey, not that I believed it. Well, it's a good thing I finished the series a long time ago anyway.
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15573
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 9:02 pm
|
|
|
gamer: It'd be Viz's loss, not Tokyopop's, because people would be stocking up on the current TPBs, so they wouldn't have to deal with dumbed-down dialogue and edited nipples.
|
Back to top |
|
|
guyverfanboy
Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Location: Watchin anime
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 12:44 am
|
|
|
tempest wrote: |
guyverfanboy wrote: | Good thing I already own all of Tokyopop's run of Marmalade Boy seeing as how I am not very fond of Viz. |
Re-read the article. Viz does not have Marmalade Boy.
-t |
They will eventually since hardly anything from Shuesha is licensed to other companies that are not Viz.
|
Back to top |
|
|
TiredGamer
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 246
Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:50 am
|
|
|
GATSU wrote: | It'd be Viz's loss, not Tokyopop's, because people would be stocking up on the current TPBs, so they wouldn't have to deal with dumbed-down dialogue and edited nipples. |
That would be fine if Tokyopop could keep printing up to the point where all of the current readership have purchased books. That not being the case, there will be those who must go without or will have to purchase the new versions. Then there are the new readers who will enter the market and will purchase the new versions.
Hence this is not a losing proposition for anyone. Tokyopop sells out their stock, and the new publisher gets new readers as well as current readership.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Awesome Possum
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
Posts: 26
Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:15 pm
|
|
|
GATSU wrote: | gamer: It'd be Viz's loss, not Tokyopop's, because people would be stocking up on the current TPBs, so they wouldn't have to deal with dumbed-down dialogue and edited nipples. |
Well, considering Marmalade Boy is 13+ and doesn't have any nudity whatsoever (From what I remember), I don't think there's going to be a problem with editing nudity. Dumbed-down dialogue? Well, unless they throw in American slang like they did for Hot Gimmick, it shouldn't be a problem. People need to stop assuming edits from one manga apply to everything a company does. Ranma, Hot Gimmick, Happy Hustle High..all got away with nudity.
And I know Viz isn't licensing it, just answering a "what if" question of sorts.
The confusion might have been because TP lost the rights and Viz licensed another Wataru Yoshizumi title.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|