×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

News
Supreme Court of Texas Denies Petition to Review Vic Mignogna's Lawsuit

posted on by Crystalyn Hodgkins
Voice actor, his lawyers filed petition for review on November 14


Vic Mignogna at Phoenix Comicon
Credit: Gage Skidmore
The Supreme Court of Texas denied a petition to review the decision in voice actor Vic Mignogna's defamation lawsuit on Friday. Mignogna and his lawyers had filed the petition on November 14, asking the higher court to review the decision in Mignogna's lawsuit against Funimation, voice actresses Jamie Marchi and Monica Rial, and Rial's fiance Ron Toye.

Although the Tarrant County District Court and the Texas Second Court of Appeals had ruled against Mignogna, the voice actor and his lawyers argued in their petition that "the court of appeals upend[ed] numerous elements of established Texas law" in its ruling.

Mignogna's Appeals

In August, the Texas Second Court of Appeals upheld the Tarrant County District Court's November 2019 judgment against Mignogna regarding the lawsuit. The court however also determined the attorney's fee amount initially awarded to Rial and Toye was less than what was "supported by factually sufficient evidence."

Therefore, the appeals court ordered the Tarrant County District Court to redetermine the awards that Mignogna must pay Rial and Toye for their attorney's fees. Otherwise, the appeals court rejected all points of Mignogna's appeal and affirmed the original ruling of the trial court. The appeals court also ordered Mignogna to "pay all costs of this appeal."

The court has yet to hold a hearing to determine a new attorney's fee amount.

Mignogna then made requests for a court rehearing and En Banc Reconsideration (in which all of the judges of an appellate court participate in the rehearing) on September 20. On September 29, the Texas Second Court of Appeals denied Mignogna's requests for a court rehearing and En Banc Reconsideration. The court maintained its judgment made in August against Mignogna.

Original Case

Over the course of his career, controversial voice actor Mignogna has received multiple allegations of sexual harassment from both colleagues and fans/convention attendees, which came to a head in 2019 when Funimation ceased its working relationship with him. Mignogna then sued both Funimation and voice actor colleagues Marchi and Rial, as well as Rial's fiance Toye, for defamation. The court later dismissed these lawsuits. The judge ruled that Mignogna must pay US$223,042.42 in attorneys' fees to the defendants. The judgment also ordered him to pay US$15,000 in sanctions, for a total of US$238,042.42. Additionally, the judgment listed US$287,500 in contingent fees that Mignogna may have to pay if he chose to appeal.

The trial court based its decision on the Texas Citizens Participation Act. Like several other states, Texas passed this statute to prevent SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), or lawsuits filed to stifle other people's freedoms of speech, association, and petition.

Over the course of the lawsuit, multiple witnesses and alleged victims of Mignogna's sexual advances or unwanted affection came forward including voice actress Kara Edwards, underage con attendees, convention staff, and industry professionals.

Mignogna has maintained that he is innocent of the allegations against him.

Source: Texas Supreme Court (link 2)


follow-up of Vic Mignogna Petitions Supreme Court of Texas to Review His Lawsuit
discuss this in the forum (26 posts) |
bookmark/share with: short url

News homepage / archives