×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 20 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
REVIEW: Steamboy


Goto page 1, 2  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
v1cious



Joined: 31 Dec 2002
Posts: 6229
Location: Houston, TX
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 2:37 pm Reply with quote
wow...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
enjin2000



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Japan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 4:59 pm Reply with quote
>The year is 1889. It’s the eve of the World Expo, a technological showcase in Victorian England.

1851.

Frankly speaking I was not so moved than the reviewer writes he was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10461
Location: Do not message me for support.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:02 pm Reply with quote
enjin2000 wrote:
Frankly speaking I was not so moved than the reviewer writes he was.


Did you like the movie but just not find it great? Or did you think it was merely an okay movie... Or was it not even okay to you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
GATSU



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15578
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:13 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
Firstly and most importantly, Steamboy excels in the storytelling department. Gone are the confusingly labyrinthine plot machinations of Otomo’s other films;Steamboy is a straight-shooting, easy-to-follow adventure tale.


What the hell was wrong with that?! Those elements forced you to pay attention while most anime today just makes me want to stop watching. Just say it the way you mean it. Steamboy's less cerebal than Akira, and will appeal to otaku who are more likely to watch shows based on dating sims.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
enjin2000



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Japan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:20 pm Reply with quote
Excellent animation, poor direction. It may sound unlogical, but I could not help comparing Steam boy with Miyazaki movies in the theater since it is certain that Otomo was inspired by Homes and Laputa.

How should I explain in English... Miyazaki is a genius having us feel the hero/heroin bodily as well as having us identify with him/her. When Chihiro dashs her head against the wall, we fell as if we really did. But in Steam Boy I did not realize it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfrog



Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 925
Location: Seattle
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:04 pm Reply with quote
GATSU wrote:
What the hell was wrong with that?! Those elements forced you to pay attention while most anime today just makes me want to stop watching. Just say it the way you mean it. Steamboy's less cerebal than Akira, and will appeal to otaku who are more likely to watch shows based on dating sims.


God forbid that a movie should actually make sense. I love how you're deriding Steamboy as the worst movie ever and constantly praising Innocence, even though you haven't seen either.

And what's wrong with making a fun adventure movie? Sure, I like films that challenge me as a viewer, but you can't say that you didn't enjoy Indiana Jones or Star Wars. If Alan Moore could write The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen without anyone crying "sellout!" and asking him to remake From Hell, why can't Katsushiro Otomo make Steamboy without everyone comparing it unfavorably to Akira?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
cookie
Former ANN Editor in Chief


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 2460
Location: Do not contact me for support.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:08 pm Reply with quote
enjin2000 wrote:
>The year is 1889. It’s the eve of the World Expo, a technological showcase in Victorian England.

1851.

Frankly speaking I was not so moved than the reviewer writes he was.


Uh, are we watching the same Steamboy? I'm pretty sure the caption read "1866 Manchester England"... particularly given that spoiler[Lloyd (the grandfather) dies in 1869, according to the end credits]. Although it didn't start in London, the action moves there rather quickly (spoiler[as soon as the Steamball and Ray are captured by Zaigen or whatever that group's name was...]) and stays there for the remainder of the film.

I was not particularly "moved" either; I did, however, enjoy the film AS an action film and am looking forward to Steamboy 2 to continue and build on that action.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Rah-Rah



Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 93
Location: Atlanta,GA
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 9:47 pm Reply with quote
GATSU wrote:
Quote:
Firstly and most importantly, Steamboy excels in the storytelling department. Gone are the confusingly labyrinthine plot machinations of Otomo’s other films;Steamboy is a straight-shooting, easy-to-follow adventure tale.


What the hell was wrong with that?! Those elements forced you to pay attention while most anime today just makes me want to stop watching. Just say it the way you mean it. Steamboy's less cerebal than Akira, and will appeal to otaku who are more likely to watch shows based on dating sims.
Now, what the hell is that supposed to mean? The last part of what you wrote, I mean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail My Anime My Manga
GATSU



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15578
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:24 pm Reply with quote
jfrog:
Quote:
God forbid that a movie should actually make sense.


I agree, which is why End of Evangelion sucks. But Akira
does make sense if you pay attention.

Quote:
I love how you're deriding Steamboy as the worst movie ever and constantly praising Innocence, even though you haven't seen either.


I never called Steamboy "worst movie ever". It just looks lacking as I hear and read more about it. And I never praised Innocence. I just said it looks better as I see and read more
about it. I'm a bigger Otomo than Oshii fan by default btw, even collecting Legend of Mother Sarah up until it got cancelled.

Quote:
And what's wrong with making a fun adventure movie? Sure, I like films that challenge me as a viewer, but you can't say that you didn't enjoy Indiana Jones or Star Wars. If Alan Moore could write The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen without anyone crying "sellout!" and asking him to remake From Hell, why can't Katsushiro Otomo make Steamboy without everyone comparing it unfavorably to Akira?


If he hadn't spent almost as long on Steamboy as he did on Akira, I probably wouldn't care. And he already made an adventure movie in the form of Spriggan, so Steamboy seems redundant.

Rah Rah: Just my usual b*tching and moaning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
enjin2000



Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Japan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:03 pm Reply with quote
If my memory is correct, Crystal Palace opened in 1851. 
And the second London EXPO was in 1862. Jan meets Nadia in 1867 in Paris EXPO.

It is probable that Otomo's London is not the actual London, like the Tokyo in Sakura Wars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 3904
Location: CO
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:43 pm Reply with quote
GATSU wrote:

I agree, which is why End of Evangelion sucks. But Akira
does make sense if you pay attention.


Actually, the End of Evangelion made plenty of sense, if you paid attention. Heaven forbid a movie require you to think and pull from Biblical and psychological references to understand the movie.

Quote:
I never called Steamboy "worst movie ever". It just looks lacking as I hear and read more about it. And I never praised Innocence. I just said it looks better as I see and read more about it.


With both movies, your opinion is based slowly on what you heard and read about them. If you haven't seen a product, you can't judge it. It's like reading a bad review of Schindler's List and then turning around and calling it a redundant piece of trash ripped from a Barney episode directed by a total hack. It just doesn't work like that. Honestly, it's unfair to rip into Steamboy without having so much as sat down to watch the thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cookie
Former ANN Editor in Chief


Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 2460
Location: Do not contact me for support.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:09 am Reply with quote
enjin2000 wrote:
It is probable that Otomo's London is not the actual London, like the Tokyo in Sakura Wars.


The soundtrack also happens to list one piece as "Manchester 1866"... So, yes, I think that's a very safe assumption that Otomo's London is not, in fact, the real thing.

The World Expo (or whatever it was in Steamboy) seemed to me like it was more about the potential use of steam power, rather than a general "expo". In that way, I found it similar to modern talks about the use of nuclear power or other fuels.. and thus it seemed to be more of a parallel between the ficticious world of Steamboy and the modern world, rather than just setting dressing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Mr Mania



Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 581
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:27 am Reply with quote
Quote:
If he hadn't spent almost as long on Steamboy as he did on Akira, I probably wouldn't care. And he already made an adventure movie in the form of Spriggan, so Steamboy seems redundant.


Except Otomo didn't direct Spriggan he was merely a producer. From what I have heard he had little to do with it. So how does him being the producer of one action movie make his directing another redundant may I ask? Even if he had directed Spriggan it still wouldn't.

Anyway I am glad to read a really positive review. Personally I don't think I am going to like it as much as I did Akira as the story doesn't appeal to me as much. Never the less its always good to watch a movie which is just a lot of fun and I can't wait until this movie hits DVD and desperately hope that it receives some cinema screenings in the UK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GATSU



Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15578
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:54 am Reply with quote
Sakechan:
Quote:
Actually, the End of Evangelion made plenty of sense, if you paid attention. Heaven forbid a movie require you to think and pull from Biblical and psychological references to understand the movie.


I'll summarize Evangelion. Boy masturbates and destroys the world, as opposed to Lain, which is about a girl who masturbates and destroys the Internet.

Quote:
With both movies, your opinion is based slowly on what you heard and read about them. If you haven't seen a product, you can't judge it. It's like reading a bad review of Schindler's List and then turning around and calling it a redundant piece of trash ripped from a Barney episode directed by a total hack.


Sometimes reviews actually apply. See Battlefield Earth. And as for Schindler's List, I'd respect a reviewer if they actually focused on the execution, and not the subject matter, compared to critics who say, "Well it's got nazis, so that must mean we have to take it more seriously, even if Spielberg's still being emotionally manipulative as usual." In Steamboy's case, the reviewer seemed to have liked the film, because they weren't a fan of Otomo's previous films, not because they actually believed it was directed well. They just appreciated that Otomo decided to make a crowd-pleaser, which is acceptable, but isn't innovative like his previous work. And the fact that people besides myself are comparing it to a Miyazaki film is a bad sign, because Miyazaki needs to retire before he starts recycling like he did in Spirited Away.

Mania:
Quote:
Except Otomo didn't direct Spriggan he was merely a producer.


You can still tell Spriggan's his baby.

Quote:
From what I have heard he had little to do with it.


It still looks like his stamp on it though.

Quote:
So how does him being the producer of one action movie make his directing another redundant may I ask? Even if he had directed Spriggan it still wouldn't.


He already associated himself with one action movie, even if he had a different part in the production process.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ANN_Bamboo
ANN Contributor


Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 3904
Location: CO
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:06 am Reply with quote
GATSU wrote:

I'll summarize Evangelion. Boy masturbates and destroys the world, as opposed to Lain, which is about a girl who masturbates and destroys the Internet.


Too bad. They both went over your head.

Quote:
And the fact that people besides myself are comparing it to a Miyazaki film is a bad sign, because Miyazaki needs to retire before he starts recycling like he did in Spirited Away.


Do you think anything is original? It seems like for everything that has popular appeal, you feel it's your duty to denounce it as a rip-off of [insert obscure movie here]/ [insert random book here]/ [insert kid's blog entry here]. Not everything can be 100% original. With so many centuries of literature under our belt, there comes a point when you CAN'T make something that's 100% original. And when it is, people decry it as being pompous, "drugged," or "HA, what a hack! People think it's cool just because it's original! Clearly they don't know what they're talking about!"

Stuff gets recycled. Heaven forbid a director have influences.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group