View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
dark_kitsune
Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 4:14 pm
|
|
|
Hiya there! I was simply wondering: why did they rate Love Hina Again "mature"? Is there any sex in it or what??? I mean, I know there's a lot of nudity...but is there plain hentai??? Pleez answer me soon!!!
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gekigangar3
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 256
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:36 pm
|
|
|
You said it yourself there is a lot of nudity, and it deals with a strange incestuous (sp) relationship that Keitaro's sister wants to have with her brother. In theatres lots of nudity would get a movie an R rating, so why should an OVA with lots of nudity not get a mature rating. Also I see that it's your first post, but you might want to use a bit better grammar, and better spelling, it would make your post much easier to read.
|
Back to top |
|
|
darkhunger
Encyclopedia Editor
Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 82
Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:38 am
|
|
|
Hmm... I have to say I disagree with that rating also. Kanako is not even Keitaro's real sister, just an adoptive one, and this kind of situation has been very common in anime as of late (heck, Da Capo deals with the exact same thing, except it even has a first-cousin relationship, and the rating there is OC)
As for the nudity, it's undetailed and for most parts, not done in a sexual manner. Ikkitoussen and Green Green, both rated Teenagers, have far worse nudity and even more sexual references. So really, I don't think Love Hina Again deserves a Mature rating, unless you change the ratings for all those other shows I mentioned (and I have many many more that are worse than LHA that I can mention)
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan42
Chief Encyclopedist
Joined: 02 Jan 2002
Posts: 3794
Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:05 am
|
|
|
I don't understand either why it was rated mature. I haven't seen it, but I cannot imagine Love Hina EVER treading into territory that should be reserved to mature audiences. Ungodly amounts of fanservice does makes the age appropriateness "mature" but rather of "teenager" level, and I've changed it so.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tony K.
![](/bbs/phpBB2/images/subscriber-plain.gif) Subscriber
Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 11498
Location: Frisco, TX
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:10 pm
|
|
|
I also disagree with the "mature" rating. I've seen the whole thing, and I only recall some fan service with a lot of cleavage and a few fanny flashes. But other than that, I don't understand.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|