Forum - View topic

NEWS: Kyoto Animation Arson Suspect Withdraws Appeal, Death Sentence Confirmed

I have strong moral objections to the death penalty and believe it should be abolished, in my own country and others.

I also believe that Shinji Aoba should be given the maximum possible sentence under Japanese law.

As I have no influence over how he will be sentenced myself, I feel no pressing need to resolve this contradiction.

How easy it is for someone's stance on issues to be undermined by passion. No one should be killed for crime even this monster.

Frankly, I'm against capital punishment, but given the severity of the crime committed I don't blame anyone for feeling that this is the appropriate punishment for the criminal, I just hope that maybe it will give some closure to the families and loved ones of those who died, but sadly there is nothing to bring them back to life. Still, don't know if this the right place to talk about, but I've heard Japan has had a complicated history in regards to the death penalty, remember that an execution is irreversible and mistakes can be made. I think there was a case in Japan where a man called Menda Sakae was senteced to death in 1950 for a crime he didn't comit and after spending 33 years in death row he was declared innocent in 1983.
Obviously, in this case the arsonist is completely guilty of the crime, but it could create problems in the future for innocent people falsely accused of a crime.

In other words, your giving a criminal exactly what he wants. They should have given him life sentences so that he can torture himself and have sleepless nights.

Only the United States, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes, and Israel for crimes under exceptional circumstances (such as during war).