View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Zin5ki
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 6680
Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:36 pm
|
|
|
Quote: | The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced seven films that are under consideration for the Oscar for makeup and hair styling on Tuesday, and the live-action Ghost in the Shell film is on the list. |
Given the circumstances, could this nomination be considered a "consolation-consolation prize"? Having failed to equal its source material's writing, it was the case that only the film's visual effects could be considered exceptional, yet now, not even those are deemed sufficient for an accolade.
|
Back to top |
|
|
AiddonValentine
Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 2250
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:12 pm
|
|
|
2017 has been a bad year for Scarlet Johanssen. GitS bombs, then the first good superheroine movie comes out with Wonder Woman, and then Charlize Theron does the female spy shtick in Atomic Blonde just to rub salt in the wound.
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15382
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:51 pm
|
|
|
Um, did you not read the article? Ghost in the Shell made money on home video.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gemnist
Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1758
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 9:19 pm
|
|
|
If GITS is going to be nominated (which it won’t), it would be for Visual Effects. Makeup is out of the question.
Zin5ki wrote: |
Quote: | The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced seven films that are under consideration for the Oscar for makeup and hair styling on Tuesday, and the live-action Ghost in the Shell film is on the list. |
Given the circumstances, could this nomination be considered a "consolation-consolation prize"? Having failed to equal its source material's writing, it was the case that only the film's visual effects could be considered exceptional, yet now, not even those are deemed sufficient for an accolade. |
Far from it. Makeup is the only category where only three films get nominated as opposed to five. And besides - would you really nominate this movie?
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15382
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:22 pm
|
|
|
Gem: Yeah, because ‘Dances with Orcs’, I mean, ‘Bright’, is *so* much more rich and compelling than Ghost in the Shell.
|
Back to top |
|
|
louis6578
Joined: 31 Jul 2013
Posts: 1868
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 1:29 am
|
|
|
I really feel bad for Scarlett Johannson. She probably never heard of GITS and thought this was just another generic action movie. Poor gal is just an actress who wanted a paycheck. I wonder if she still would have signed on if she knew what a bastardized project this would end up being.
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15382
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:59 am
|
|
|
louis: I think she liked the idea that the original story had more for her character than ‘wear tight black outfit, and punch and kick guys’. Oh, I’m sorry, Joss, it’s supposed to be an empowering moment, amirite?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wrangler
Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Posts: 1346
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:15 pm
|
|
|
Tough going. I didn't think it was executed as well they could have. Taking chances on casting on a beloved franchise anime/scifi wise.
|
Back to top |
|
|
BadNewsBlues
Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 6069
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:36 pm
|
|
|
AiddonValentine wrote: | 2017 has been a bad year for Scarlet Johanssen. GitS bombs, then the first good superheroine movie comes out with Wonder Woman, and then Charlize Theron does the female spy shtick in Atomic Blonde just to rub salt in the wound. |
Ummmm neither of those two things reflect badly on her especially as up until Wonder Woman Gal Gadot was considered by many to be a very weak actress whose only claim to fame was being in a couple of Fast And Furious movies (which her character was ultimately killed off in) along with Batman v Superman (whose reception didn't exactly give much hope to the Wonder Woman film). Whereas with Atomic Blonde no one really speaks about the movie which should give you an idea of how not very huge the movie's reception was (and wasn't even a remotely new concept since Gina Carano made a similar movie years ago that people also forgot about).
louis6578 wrote: | I really feel bad for Scarlett Johannson. She probably never heard of GITS and thought this was just another generic action movie. Poor gal is just an actress who wanted a paycheck. I wonder if she still would have signed on if she knew what a bastardized project this would end up being. |
Yes she would've.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|