View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
RoverTX
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 424
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:30 pm
|
|
|
Even if its against their ToS, how can they then go ahead and put her real birthday in there, through what seems to be a violation of privacy, and not just blank out her birthday, unless of course not putting in a date of birth is also against their ToS also... blah what a crappy situation.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kougeru
Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 5592
|
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:26 pm
|
|
|
I personally find it bizarrre that her real age would hinder her work, supposedly. I think her appearance would be more important for that once she turned into a legal adult
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotlesseden
Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 3514
Location: earth
|
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 12:08 am
|
|
|
RoverTX wrote: | Even if its against their ToS, how can they then go ahead and put her real birthday in there, through what seems to be a violation of privacy, and not just blank out her birthday, unless of course not putting in a date of birth is also against their ToS also... blah what a crappy situation. |
even if they put her real birthday in there. She still has no right for 1 million dollars.
|
Back to top |
|
|
LavenderMintRose
Joined: 30 Nov 2012
Posts: 168
|
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 6:15 am
|
|
|
At first I saw that and got a little angry, and thought it was the jury just not caring about artists (since most people don't care about artists, especially actors.) But I didn't know the stuff about falsifying documents.
No matter how badly something's going to affect you, or how much you deserve something, there are just some things that are like taking a chainsaw to any leverage you might have had. Falsifying documents is one of those things. Lying on a resume, too. That sort of thing.
Also, it does affect her ability to get work - it's sort of a sexist thing, like it only matters for women. But they are less likely to cast someone older. Remember, unless you're a big Hollywood star, commercials and the like are what pays the bills for most actors.
|
Back to top |
|
|
PurpleWarrior13
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:04 pm
|
|
|
Sounds to me, they're both in the wrong. Junie Hoang provided false information, breaching the terms of service, and IMDB used her credit card information without permission, breaching her privacy.
It's not like she's done a whole lot anyway. The only credit of her's I recognize is the original Chun-Li in the ADV UK dub of the Street Fighter anime. She's apparently been in a lot of live action stuff since.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dessa
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 4438
|
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:32 pm
|
|
|
I agree with PurpleWarrior. I don't think they should have found in her favor, but they shouldn't've found in IMDb's, either.
|
Back to top |
|
|
clawfinger
Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Posts: 38
Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 6:01 pm
|
|
|
Their site, their rules. Grats to IMDB.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Haterater
Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1728
|
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:49 pm
|
|
|
Honestly, I blame Hollywood's sexism for this. She wouldn't have to lie if the industry didn't discriminate against older actresses to begin with.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|