Forum - View topicEditing & Censorship in Anime
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
Author | Message | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Myrick
Posts: 16 Location: Reno, Nevada |
|
|||||
Even when you lock away a gun, having a key stolen by your kid is still a possibility. Having that possibility doesn't mean you shouldn't get a lock put in. It's the same with anime. Just because kids can look up explicit materials on the internet doesn't mean we shouldn't put safeguards in place.
|
||||||
Snowcat
Posts: 190 |
|
|||||
A gun can kill. Fanservice won't kill anybody. On the subject, fanservice in the scope of censorship is always conflate with nudity which is a taboo coming from puritanism exported world wide by america but was already present in lot of countries for religious or cultural reasons. A clear example, is that everybody has nipples, so why is it needed to censor them ? How is it protecting anybody and from what ? I never understood in which way the T&A depiction has any consequence on anybody. (except that shows based on fanservice are often bad in my opinion)
Completely right, it's always a group of person wanting to control the cultural content to affirm their power on others. They use moral arguments to avoid having a rational debate on the subject but it's quite common in politics. In fact, there were a lot of fanservice present in older anime aimed at children (Ranma, maison ikkoku, city hunter, dragon ball) or violence (saint seya, dragon ball, hokuto no ken). I don't think there is any proof that those older generations of kids became "deviants" or anything because of that exposition. It's international influence and the evolution of japanese society and laws that removed those elements in kid shows. The censorship on ecchi anime is coming from the japanese laws about obscenity to broadcast on TV channel (whatever the hour of broadcast which is stupid in my opinion), that's why only AT-X broadcasts uncensored versions. But that is the main reason why the content of 90's OAV which have been replaced by late-night anime cannot be compared because of censorship : it's impossible to broadcast an anime with half the content cut on TV channels. Censorship destroyed "creativity" for no objective reason but the main cause was japanese moral lobbies for political correctness. In western countries, if the content were uncensored and available, it should be streamed without problem. |
||||||
Spawn29
Posts: 556 |
|
|||||
That's not true with many people in red states in the US are still very religious and do have control a lot of things. The other part is right about how Abrahamic religions do play apart of western culture. Many do feel liking violence and porn as a sinful thing to do. Going from what I've and been told by many people, Japan does not view the same standers as we do because Abrahamic religions don't play a big role there.
Jojo is based on a 80s manga though. |
||||||
TarsTarkas
Posts: 5991 Location: Virginia, United States |
|
|||||
Yes, there is alot of variables, but overall religion as a whole has taken a hit in popularity, it doesn't have the national bite, that it used to have. Manga fans that like more mature manga (and manga that hasn't westernized) have more to fear from the progressives, than from the religious. Really, you only need to read ANN to have that point proven. I haven't seen any reviews and comments hammering manga for religious reasons, there could be some out there, but I don't remember seeing any. But I have seen many attacking manga and anime for politcial correctness on a consistent basis. |
||||||
ATastySub
Past ANN Contributor
Posts: 708 |
|
|||||
Weird, almost like reviews and criticism aren’t an actual attack on anything despite how often you claim that’s what they are, and the people that also believe criticism is unimportant don’t write any and jump straight to attempts to ban things. But keep jumping at fake enemies in your brain while the real people you support do exactly what you’re so afraid of. |
||||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||||
This doesn't remotely hold up to scrutiny. The people with actual political power who try to ban anime and manga in the US are almost always the religious right. |
||||||
TarsTarkas
Posts: 5991 Location: Virginia, United States |
|
|||||
I can see why you would say that.
But I still think that the secret censoring and editing for content, and the delisting of digital manga is the influence of the progressives and politcal correctness, and not the "horror of it all" from the religious side of things. |
||||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||||
And do you have any evidence of this, or is it just conjecture? Because as far as I know they've never commented on their reasons. |
||||||
TarsTarkas
Posts: 5991 Location: Virginia, United States |
|
|||||
No, I don't have any evidence that you could use in a court of law. So it is just my opinion, based on what I have seen and read.
Yeah, you get these occasional politcians trying to make some points for their elections, and the occasional PTA or other groups. But they are usually here today, gone tomorrow. On the otherhand, we have the constant bombardment of criticism of anime and manga for reasons of culture and political correctness. I think it is perfectly fair to say that publishing companies are much more concerned over being 'canceled' or receiving the ire of social media, than the fire and brimstone from a random PTA group or some church. But I guess that is just me. |
||||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||||
The thing is, critics actually don't wield that much power. Seriously! It's frustrating for me to say as a critic, but very little of what I do or say makes much difference in the face of sales numbers. Plus, very few critics (and none I know personally) are actually in favor of censorship, because it's a sword that cuts both ways. If it were about the "woke mob" or progressivism or whatever, Seven Seas wouldn't have removed sections of I'm in Love with the Villainess, and Dave Chapelle's special would have been removed from Netflix while The Babysitter's Club would have been renewed for another season. I'll let you know who the actual enemy is: corporations. Seriously! Corporations who control large segments of the market have contributed heavily to the sanitization of the internet. Apple doesn't anything with heavy sexual content to be sold in its app store. Credit card companies will refuse to do business with anything involving sex work. Disney cancelled Nimona when it bought Blue Sky Studios because of same-sex romance, and more and more queer creators have been speaking out about how they've been treated. I don't know exactly why Amazon decided to pull a bunch of light novels, but I can almost guarantee it had more to do with corporate interests than public pressure. We live in an oligarchy, were a few corporations have disproportionate control over what the public can access, and if you actually pay attention to who's getting silenced the most instead of hysterics about the "woke mob" or whatever, you'll see that it has nothing to do with progressivism whatsoever. |
||||||
BonusStage
Posts: 307 |
|
|||||
I'll agree that corporations don't ultimately care about these topics or issues and are only looking to capitalize on trends for money, but to say that progressivism is not the dominate soft power in American society is false. You would be hard pressed to find any tentpole franchise out of America these days that does not aggressively market towards that base: movies, television, comic books, video games, or streaming content. They all present themselves and their current media as focusing on LGBT, racial, and gender issues. To find anything that doesn't include this stuff, let alone goes against it, is virtually impossible in the modern American landscape. People can certainly complain about Rainbow Capitalism and how ungenuine it is, but that side is ultimately still the ones at the top even if its not being done out of pure genuine belief. I'm sure other groups out there would be thrilled to have corporations make hollow gestures for them after having been starved of content so long. For a creator to complain about one movie being shelved after an acquisition seems more like resentfulness than anything about the content itself given there's plenty of similar content being made by the same company. Ultimately, it's not the CEOs at the top of these companies actually making these works, it's the writers and directors creating them. Whatever Bob Chapek's actions and beliefs are aren't preventing Star Wars and Marvel brands from making half their characters LGBT. |
||||||
ATastySub
Past ANN Contributor
Posts: 708 |
|
|||||
“Half their characters” hahahaha. God imagine seeing Disney trot out a single plausibly deniable minor side character maybe once a year (that then gets edited out internationally) and thinking everything is suddenly full of the dreaded gays. Here’s the thing, the opposite of LGBT acceptance you apparently want must not be ignoring them, because that’s what 99% of stuff still is. So that leaves outright bigotry as what you’re complaining doesn’t exist, which still isn’t even true. There’s sadly still plenty of that, but I guess unless it’s a majority of the content you’ll still be complaining about woke agenda nonsense as the very corporations that own all the production continue to fund conservatives and continue to hamstring their creative teams in order to make content that appeals to those conservatives. |
||||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||||
I was born in Hollywood and grew up in LA. I was on national TV before I could walk or speak. I had classmates who missed school because they were busy with their TV roles, and other classmates who were children of legendary actors. I grew up with close friends whose parents were in the entertainment industry who talked to me about their work. My dad is friends with Jim Beaver and Lee Meriwether and has performed onstage with both. You have absolutely zero idea how any of this works. |
||||||
FeelMyBlade
Posts: 155 |
|
|||||
Case in point: the recent controversy with Marvel's Conan the Barbarian where progressives complained about the depiction of one of the female characters which ended up with massive censorship in reprints and updates to the digital editions of the book. Conservatives hold no power when it comes to American media. In fact, most American media openly makes fun of conservatives. For Japanese media it's very easy to look up who is behind most cases of censorship. Most of the translators who work on these projects are very transparent about it. They have public social media accounts where they usually detail their process of localization and changing things do not agree with during the translation process. In the 90s it may have been conservatives who censored gay characters out of anime and manga because they didn't want to see them or found them appropriate for kids, but in 2022 it's progressives who censor gay and trans characters because they're usually derogatory stereotypes and they're trying to tone down the homophobia/transphobia. I'm having a hard time thinking of any modern piece of Japanese work that has been censored in the west due to 'conservative' values, but I can think of plenty that were censored in the name of 'progressive' values: usually relating to Japan's view on things like race, gender and sexual orientation. |
||||||
all-tsun-and-no-dere
ANN Reviewer
Posts: 671 |
|
|||||
I'm curious... have you taken any time to understand just why people objected to that character? Because it wasn't just that she had her boobs out.
I follow a ton of left-leaning translators on Twitter and I have literally never seen anything like this come up. |
||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group