×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Answerman - Why Is Japan's Population Declining?


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
EricJ2



Joined: 01 Feb 2014
Posts: 4016
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:12 pm Reply with quote
H. Guderian wrote:
Declining population isn't good if only you're doing it.
is it no wonder the first thing Hitler wanted to do was make more babies? More bodies wins every conflict.


Every dictator wants to increase the population to increase the workforce and future military--
It was the same problem in Romania, and as the authors of "Freakonomics" theorized, a state-enforced rise in population may have led to Romania's spiked increase in crime fifteen to twenty years later, as more lower-income families who couldn't support and provide for children were leaned upon by the government to have them.
The authors' controversial theory was that the US's legalization of abortion in the 70's may have led to a sudden downturn in crime in the late 80's and early 90's, which all the sociologists were trying to find political explanations for (Reagan? Giuliani?).

It's not so much the amount of population, as the balance that can provide education and employment for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eri94



Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 220
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:15 pm Reply with quote
Satoshi Batista wrote:
Cam0 wrote:
Vaisaga wrote:
It's not that otaku men aren't interested in 3D women, it's that 3D women aren't interested in otaku men.


Nah, probably more like that the otaku aren't interested in trying to actively pursue a relationship.


It sounds like it might be both. I'm trying to find a link to it, but there was a news report from earlier this year where one of the analysts suggested that part of the problem could be that otaku media gives young men unrealistically idealized depictions of what having a girlfriend would be like, which leads to a lot of young women not wanting to bother with them.

I mean one of the most frequent jokes/insults I see aimed at a lot of otaku-oriented anime is that the writers have clearly never actually had girlfriends before.
You have this backwards. Most young women have a completely unrealistic view of what a man should provide and do for them and more men are just opting out instead of dealing with ever increasing bullshit.

This is happening the world over but in Japan it is much accelerated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Mr.Shonen



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 269
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:28 pm Reply with quote
NearEasternerJ1 wrote:
As I said before, Japan may need to be like the UK and undergo a demographic and cultural change. What it means to be "Japanese" cannot be simply about heritage and belonging to a nation state of vaguely defined East Asians.

People who oppose multiculturalism use Europe as an example, but Sweden and Norway are doing perfectly fine. It's just that Fox News and the right-wing EU media exaggerate Muslim behaviour. Most crime comes from natives. Even in the USA, which claims to be a culturally homogenous country, yet is highly diverse. Immigrants in NYC, LA and Miami don't melt into a pot, but they are part of the salad bowl and it does work! Foreigners do better than native Americans. Whilst we have debates about America's role or lack thereof in bringing prosperity for "African-Americans", actual African-Americans are the most educated group in America.

Besides, some argue that immigration into Britain was a way for Britain to pay for what it done to the world. Japan should accept immigration from Asia to show that it has repented for its own sins.


Why should Japan go through a European style change? Real life ain't that decades old Coca Cola commercial. I live in NYC, it's not the Diversity Utopia people like you claim it is. Most of it is pockets filled different ethnicities where English is not their first language, rather stick to their own kind and pretend their street is the place they came from. Also, don't act like every non native European that lives in a Sweden or England is accepting of their host nations customs and traditions.

Back to Japan. They literally had no problem taking over other Asian countries 80 years ago. You really think every Japanese person is gonna except those people with open arms automatically foregoing their biases and prejudices. Again please let me have what you're smoking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Aphasial
Exempt from Grammar Rules


Joined: 08 Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:36 pm Reply with quote
Eri94 wrote:
You have this backwards. Most young women have a completely unrealistic view of what a man should provide and do for them and more men are just opting out instead of dealing with ever increasing bullshit.

This is happening the world over but in Japan it is much accelerated.
That really goes both ways. Men are taking longer to grow up -- why bother taking on responsibility when video games and pornography (heavy or light) are easily available? -- and women are pressured to have a career and delay settling down.

Gender interaction has changed on both sides of the Pacific, but for different reasons. American problems have been *strongly* sped up by the 2008 recession and the general Millennial "malaise", while Western Europe has been more strongly affected by rapid secularization and simply papering over it more and more with the immigration that's now the source of so much instability.

Japan's causes are a bit more unique, with its cultural pressures, the Asian financial crisis of the late '90s, and Hikikomori phenomena which grew in the 2000's long before we were seeing much of that in the US. Nevertheless, the end result becomes the same. Few children, fewer marriages, fewer demands on people to grow up and live in the real world instead of a fantasy one, and an economy that struggles to a) fund social services with fewer workers, and b) squeezes more productivity out of the existing ones or automates their job away as a way to reduce operating risk.

But yes, men and women need to get together and have babies. Societies which de-emphasize this do so at their own mortal risk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number
helln00



Joined: 01 Apr 2016
Posts: 106
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:53 pm Reply with quote
To the people that noted that part of the reason for the lower birthrate is due to greater economic independence of the women and therefore them foregoing marriage in favour of a career, there is a very interesting insight into this phenomenon that people should note.

I cant remmember the name of the study off the top of my head since i only heard about it in a lecture but there is also another relation that has been found with regards to marriage and labour, so it may and probably does indirectly affect birthrate

The relation is that a marriage tends to be more successful if the men has a more substantial share of the unpaid-labour (housekeeping, childcare probably the most expensive thing on the list, house maintenance) then say the average couple. The point of the insight is to note that the mechanism of of decreasing marriage isnt the economic opportunity of the women in and of itself, but that a marriage is maintained to a strong extent by the unpaid work and now that both people have access to paid opportunities, the unpaid labour that maintains the marriage becomes less of an action that is taken.

For marriages to survive therefore, its more likely that couples with more equal share of work contribution, paid or otherwise will have the more successful marriage. So policies that may deal with the marriage problem purely through financial incentives such as taxes maynot be as affective as providing services that makes the unpaid labour less intensive like childcare or even something more complex like changing work hours so family maintainance can be more manageable.

tbh though this is a cultural thing and arguably even harder to change then most of the economic incentives and structural incentives out there, i wont put my money on whether or not the cultural institution of marriage survives in it current form in the next few decades. if that is the case we may need a better system of making kids, may its finally time for real test tube humans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FloozyGod





PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:58 pm Reply with quote
Vaisaga wrote:


I see all kinds of hentai manga with the premise of "Japanese government legalizes rape to combat declining birth rate"


That's messed up!
Back to top
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:27 pm Reply with quote
NearEasternerJ1 wrote:
As I said before, Japan may need to be like the UK and undergo a demographic and cultural change.


Japan usually likes to be compared and want to be ranked with western Europe countries.

Both have similar annual growth rate GDP (pretty stagnant by American standards) and both have basically hit the wall.

Japan and western Europe are in post-growth.

Western Europe thinks the way out of post-growth is to become multi-cultural and import more migrants with dissimilar, if not outright hostile to western liberal society.

Japan thinks the way out is to stay on course (demographically) and continue to innovate (high tech, robotics, and artificial intelligence) and brace for the dawning of Singularity.

Mark my words. It will be Europeans who wished they followed japan's footsteps in dealing with post growth society and transition to Singularity. Europe will be saddled with bunch of deadweights, chaos, strife and natives feeling like they lost their own country.

The western European situation is perfectly summed up here:

" Multikultistan: A house of horrors for ordinary Germans "
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/295

The above is a sobering intel memo the Hillary Clinton campaign chairman received earlier this year when the Hillary camp staunchly advocated for increasing middle east refugee settlement in the US in that same timeframe.

It contains all the ails the ordinary Europeans (not just Germans, and Sweden is in for a more sorry disgraceful state it's finding itself into) have to put up with (it was something that need not forced to them), and if a Japanese reads this (or at least read translated version) it would encourage most Japanese to keep their current course and just continue to keep innovating technologically in order to be prepared for potential disruptive (if not destructive) nature of Singularity while also thriving.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FloozyGod





PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:54 pm Reply with quote
Mr.Shonen wrote:
Immigration will never be an answer. Japan is too nationalistic for that. Also, who's to say that any immigrant groups would be willing to accept Japanese customs/norms. Eventually it would lead to situations similar to those in Europe.


Justin said 1/3 of Japan's population is over 60, and I believe this nationalistic ideal is held by them the most. So as the old guard dies out, the younger generation with an open mind will change the policies and let more immigrants move in, and let women have more flexibility between work and raising a child.
Back to top
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:06 pm Reply with quote
FloozyGod wrote:
Mr.Shonen wrote:
Immigration will never be an answer. Japan is too nationalistic for that. Also, who's to say that any immigrant groups would be willing to accept Japanese customs/norms. Eventually it would lead to situations similar to those in Europe.


Justin said 1/3 of Japan's population is over 60, and I believe this nationalistic ideal is held by them the most. So as the old guard dies out, the younger generation with an open mind will change the policies and let more immigrants move in, and let women have more flexibility between work and raising a child.


Japan only wants revolving door policy for those with no university degree. So guest worker "intern" "trainee" program is the preferred method.

Also, Japanese voters, in two elections 15 months apart, accorded their government a remarkable show of trust, giving Shinzo Abe and his Liberal Democrat Party a two-thirds “supermajority” in both houses of the Diet. What policies this trust rewards or seeks to encourage is unclear. It’s an extraordinary gift conferred by a democracy upon an unabashedly illiberal government.

Interestingly enough, the strongest support — the deepest trust — came from voters in their teens and 20s, the very segment that used to regard just about any serving government, let alone a conservative one, with cynicism. If cynicism has given way to trust, so much the better (unless it’s blind trust).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cutiebunny



Joined: 18 Apr 2010
Posts: 1755
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:11 pm Reply with quote
NearEasternerJ1 wrote:
Foreigners do better than native Americans.


That is an overgeneralization. Among latinos, this is not true. Ever gone to a school that is predominantly latino in the US? I have and I can tell you that if you want to be popular with your peers, you don't get As.

I know some of you would like to feel that Japan will get more progressive as the elderly die out, but a lot of women don't want these changes to occur either. They realize how difficult it would be to work full time and raise children, so they're not necessarily all up in arms about things remaining as they are. And with professional child care often costing $700-$2000/month (http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21880124), why would they want to work full time when most of that money will be spent on childcare? I remember reading another article on the BBC where one of the reporters who was recently posted in Japan complained that there was no space for her child at any of the local daycare centers as many of the women start reserving future spots for their child during pregnancy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:14 pm Reply with quote
Mr.Shonen wrote:

Can I have what you're smoking especially for that repent for sins tripe you spouted? Why should Japan go through a European style change? Real life ain't that decades old Coca Cola commercial. I live in NYC, it's not the Diversity Utopia people like you claim it is. Most of it is pockets filled different ethnicities where English is not their first language, rather stick to their own kind and pretend their street is the place they came from. Also, don't act like every non native European that lives in a Sweden or England is accepting of their host nations customs and traditions.

Back to Japan. They literally had no problem taking over other Asian countries 80 years ago. You really think every Japanese person is gonna except those people with open arms automatically foregoing their biases and prejudices. Again please let me have what you're smoking.


I live in California and I've also never really seen it either. Every city I've lived in was segregated for the most part. During high school and college white people hung out with mostly white people, blacks with blacks, Mexicans with Mexicans. All those shows that have a team full of diverse members never seem very realistic to me due to my experiences

I don't really follow European news but diversity in Japan would only be a bad thing. There's already tension between foreigners in Japan and Japanese. One of the biggest conflicts involving US servicemen in places like Okinawa, which are cited as being a major factor in crime rates. A few months ago there was a huge protest about Japanese wanting American servicemen out of Japan since they committed so many crimes like rape and drugs. There's nothing wrong with being a homogeneous society. There's more evidence than not that it's more beneficial than being multicultural.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deadwing



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 174
Location: North Augusta, SC
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:33 pm Reply with quote
Japan has two options:

1) Propose, pass, and enforce natalist policies. Such policies should be pro-active. Tax breaks for having children. Better access to affordable child care and other services to make raising children less of a financial burden. But natalism carries its own dangers, as unchecked population growth creates an ever-greater drain on natural resources. Japan should focus on stabilizing their population by increasing the total fertility rate to right at or only slightly above replacement level.

2) Encourage immigration. This would be the quick-fix solution. More foreign-born people coming to live and work in Japan creates more workers and grows the economy, assuming per capita GDP remains constant or grows. In fact, the only reason the U.S.'s population is continuing to grow is because of immigration, as our total fertility rate is a bit below replacement level. An immigration-focused would have to focus on assimilation of immigrants and on encouraging businesses to hire foreign-born workers and pay them well, as well as tolerate non-Japanese as customers. However, this policy runs into problems of its own. Japan is a racially homogeneous nation with a strong xenophobic undercurrent. An influx of immigrants can help stoke nativist and racist sentiment just as it does in the West (what's Japanese for "They took our jobs!"?), thus resulting in a backlash.

But whether it's from increasing the fertility rate or bringing in immigrants, Japan will have to find some way to grow or at least stabilize its population if it doesn't want to continue shrinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satoshi Batista



Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 13
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:44 pm Reply with quote
Eri94 wrote:
You have this backwards. Most young women have a completely unrealistic view of what a man should provide and do for them and more men are just opting out instead of dealing with ever increasing bullshit.

This is happening the world over but in Japan it is much accelerated.


If it that's the case then it cuts both ways, because I've seen quite a few instances of dudes complaining about modern women being too uppity and not fitting the ideal they have. There are plenty of men who hold very ridiculous, idealized visions of a wife or girlfriend who just shuts up and goes along with whatever they want to do, and then are shocked to find out a lot of women actually have their own desires and opinions in the real world.

And if you're the kind of woman who is actually focused on having a career or personal ambitions, that's generally not the sort of future you want for yourself.

Quote:
They literally had no problem taking over other Asian countries 80 years ago. You really think every Japanese person is gonna except those people with open arms automatically foregoing their biases and prejudices.


There's always going to be initial resistance to change. But if things didn't happen because there was a segment of the population that might get pissed off at it, stuff would literally never get done. You're never gonna have a unanimously popular strategy or social change that everyone is in favor of.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NGK



Joined: 10 Mar 2010
Posts: 244
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:04 pm Reply with quote
Deadwing wrote:
Japan has two options:

1) Propose, pass, and enforce natalist policies. Such policies should be pro-active. Tax breaks for having children. Better access to affordable child care and other services to make raising children less of a financial burden. But natalism carries its own dangers, as unchecked population growth creates an ever-greater drain on natural resources. Japan should focus on stabilizing their population by increasing the total fertility rate to right at or only slightly above replacement level.

2) Encourage immigration. This would be the quick-fix solution. More foreign-born people coming to live and work in Japan creates more workers and grows the economy, assuming per capita GDP remains constant or grows. In fact, the only reason the U.S.'s population is continuing to grow is because of immigration, as our total fertility rate is a bit below replacement level. An immigration-focused would have to focus on assimilation of immigrants and on encouraging businesses to hire foreign-born workers and pay them well, as well as tolerate non-Japanese as customers. However, this policy runs into problems of its own. Japan is a racially homogeneous nation with a strong xenophobic undercurrent. An influx of immigrants can help stoke nativist and racist sentiment just as it does in the West (what's Japanese for "They took our jobs!"?), thus resulting in a backlash.

But whether it's from increasing the fertility rate or bringing in immigrants, Japan will have to find some way to grow or at least stabilize its population if it doesn't want to continue shrinking.


How about a third option... Like entertaining the option for central & local government to incentivize willing participants currently the cities to live in the countryside that have depopulated and make it productive again?

For example:

-Tax cuts and other incentives for companies to relocate their headquarters out of the main urban areas of Japan.

-Providing people who are considering moving to the countryside the necessary living/job information to do so.

-The central government providing funds to localities who have produced concrete and sound plans for their own revivals.

-Measures to increase the birthrate, including the setting up of sufficient numbers of childcare facilities.

-Active enticing and development of new industries
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jonny Mendes



Joined: 17 Oct 2014
Posts: 997
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:24 pm Reply with quote
NearEasternerJ1 wrote:

People who oppose multiculturalism use Europe as an example, but Sweden and Norway are doing perfectly fine. It's just that Fox News and the right-wing EU media exaggerate Muslim behaviour.

Have you go to Sweden or Norway?
Because multiculturalism don't work. Muslim people in those countries live in ghettos were the Police don't go and were crime and sharia law are rampant. They are deporting emigrants, and closed the borders to refugees. That are happening all over Europe.

And trying imposing multiculturalism in Japan would only led to absolute fail. The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Aso Taro said that Japan is "one civilization, one language, one culture and one race".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 5 of 12

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group