×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
Shelf Life - Clanning Up


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Megiddo



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Posts: 8360
Location: IL
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:22 am Reply with quote
[quote="Zac"]
Megiddo wrote:

Quote:

And then you can go on about actually reviewing the content of the anime, and not how gigantic the eyes are, or how they look like 12 year olds (unless Manabi Straight happens to make it over here... =P)


I get what you're saying - the specific story details of the show itself and how they progress and whether or not they're well-written or satisfying on any level - should be the chief goal of the review.

But saying that the show doesn't rely wholeheartedly on moe genre trappings is a disservice to the reader. Acknowledging that is important. Not everyone is so in love with the genre that they just ignore or can't see that it's just as formulaic as Naruto or Bleach.

Notably most of this stuff is all based on hentai video games.


Oh, one could mention that the show contains the standard moe package, but I don't really want to read a long paragraph detailing every little bit of cliche or so contained in the anime. It's like if a review for One Piece just listed all the cliches that are in there instead of the things that set it apart from the others. Personally, if I know it's a shounen fighter, then I'm pretty sure of what I'm getting myself into.

Reading over Bamboo's review again, I quite liked the paragraphs written about the atmosphere and music, but I just couldn't get over those first two which basically detailed the nuances that are found in every moe/visual novel anime. Maybe had she balanced those paragraphs out by including more information on the story, there might not have been such an uproar? Well, I suppose fans will defend what they enjoy no matter what.

Anyway, regarding your last comment, thankfully Clannad was one of (if not) the first visual novels on the PC that was 100% ero-free. The most graphic picture found in Clannad is a kiss, with the characters fully clothed while doing so.

There definitely is a prevalent amount of porn though, I agree. I'm not for that. I like the visual novel titles that set themselves above the others. Those that have an emphasis on story and characters rather than erotic content.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mad_Scientist
Subscriber
Moderator


Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 3011
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:22 am Reply with quote
Zac wrote:
Notably most of this stuff is all based on hentai video games. A lot of you conveniently dismiss or forget that fact. In the game version all these girls exist so you can pick which one you'd like to see your virtual self f*ck at the end of the game. Yeah so she gets hit by a bus or has a miscarriage or gets cancer or something. That doesn't make it deep meaningful drama, it means you like soap operas that end in porn, and when they take the porn out, you still like the story part.

To be fair, what a show is or isn't based on is largely irrelevant in my mind. A show should be judged on it's own merits. And from what I've read about them, Air/Kanon/Clannad are far tamer and cleaner than a large amount of other animes.

But I suppose the fact they are based on H games doesn't help the stereotype these shows (and their fans) suffer from, but as I said, it shouldn't have any bearing on the quality of the shows themselves.

EDIT: Apparantly the Clannad visual novel at least is NOT pornagraphic or even close. Interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
Zin5ki



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 6680
Location: London, UK
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:53 am Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:
Zac wrote:
Notably most of this stuff is all based on hentai video games. A lot of you conveniently dismiss or forget that fact. In the game version all these girls exist so you can pick which one you'd like to see your virtual self f*ck at the end of the game. Yeah so she gets hit by a bus or has a miscarriage or gets cancer or something. That doesn't make it deep meaningful drama, it means you like soap operas that end in porn, and when they take the porn out, you still like the story part.

To be fair, what a show is or isn't based on is largely irrelevant in my mind. A show should be judged on it's own merits. And from what I've read about them, Air/Kanon/Clannad are far tamer and cleaner than a large amount of other animes.

To consider as separate the eroge and the anime from which they are derived is appropriate.
I would probably not wish to play such games, so too I assume would many others. Such games exist as a means to an end quite distinct from that of their televised stories, an end which many of us would consider to cheapen the drama that preceded it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website My Anime My Manga
Ceral



Joined: 06 Oct 2008
Posts: 28
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:00 am Reply with quote
Mad_Scientist wrote:

EDIT: Apparantly the Clannad visual novel at least is NOT pornagraphic or even close. Interesting.


Interesting eh? I think they saw that there storylines were good enough to sale without the dirty content, and wouldn't you know... "In the October 2007 issue of Dengeki G's Magazine, poll results for the fifty best bishōjo games were released. Out of 249 titles, Clannad ranked first..." I grabbed that from wiki ;p, but if you watch the show, the comedy is what keeps it entertaining and the melodrama is what makes it special. There's nothing about porn or fanservice that motivates me to watch it, that doesn't even come to mind talking on an Anime forum, usually I can talk freely ;p.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mysticmidnightmaiden



Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 123
Location: California (Bay Area)
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:19 am Reply with quote
Ceral wrote:
The characters relationships for the first half, I would label it as "friendship", there's not any, I like this person, I need to do this to get him/her to like me by doing x. It's pretty low key and easy going, it's just like daily life, but with A LOT of cute girls in between. It's supposed to be fun, and then a bit emotional when you see how hard the characters work to try to bring happiness to their family members. Despite what I've just said, it's a seinen show, a show designed for guys, and you will have to be comfortable watching a show that doesn't have a lot of explosions or barely any action at all. What moves the story along, is getting to know each of the characters, and seeing the fun and emotionally touching moments between them.

Most of your post (besides this quote) was a summary of the plot. I wasn't looking for that. Episode summaries are a Google search away. I want a review based on it's merits. What does it execute well? What does it fail to do well? Besides the characters/plot/theme, what differentiates it from other moe shows?

You say it's a seinen show. Besides the few fans who'll give it a view from word of mouth, does it have any crossover appeal to those outside the genre? Could you gateway people into anime with Clannad?

That's the kind of support I'm looking for. If Clannad's nothing but a guilty pleasure, there's no problems with that. Everyone deserves their favorite sweets once in a while. It could be a mediocre series and I still wouldn't care. Sometimes we all need a brain break from the hard-hitters. It could be TEH EPIC SERIES U NEED 2 C THIS YR!!1 Just make sure to call it like it is and have proper support for your opinions. That's all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
pparker



Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 1185
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:04 am Reply with quote
Zac wrote:
I just got Lyrical Nanoha A's in the mail from Funimation and I have no idea if we should even bother reviewing this or not at this point. Also any responses to this saying "DURRR I'LL REVIEW IT SEND IT TO ME!" will be deleted and I'll ban you for being not clever.

That one's easy. Just don't give to you you-know-who. Unless you want to generate a lot of advertising revenue. Wink But seriously, I find ANN reviews overall to be high quality. I've reacted vehemently to exactly two of them in the past 6 months or so that I've started reading them. One due to an obvious, heartfelt bias against a genre, and one that contained patently false data.

Informing us that a show fits a certain genre and follows a standard formula or contains the usual cliches is appropriate. Spewing one's hatred for a genre is not. I would prefer to know what, if anything, sets a show apart from the lesser examples of the same genre (requiring someone with experience watching that genre). What about it would make me want to pay for it? Or should I not waste my money, because I'll be back to blame you for fluffing up some dreck. Beyond that, what makes it a show that non-fans of that genre should consider?

In the case of Nanoha, there's a reason it is so popular and has three seasons. We didn't get Magical Canan over here, because it's a direct knock-off of Cardcaptor Sakura and Nanoha with virtually nothing original added. Nanatsuiro Drops is decent, though we'll probably never see it licensed. Nanoha on the other hand, is pretty good. Doesn't approach Cardcaptor Sakura, the gold standard, IMHO, but it's certainly worth the money if you like magical girl shows. All it needs is someone to review it who hasn't already decided that it's crap before they even tear off the cellophane.


Ceral wrote:
pparker wrote:

Speaking of formulas... as a relatively new fan trying to catch up, I started watching these high school "romcoms"...

You say that you've got a long list of these, you know... I can't find any high school romcoms I like outside of KyoAni, Chobits(not really high school, but close enough), and Toradora, care to share any of the names of the titles that start out as comedies and do a good transition into drama? I keep hearing that there's a lot of these but, maybe not really, maybe the people arguing against Clannad are lumping all the visual novel shows together...

I'm also curious about all these "moe" shows people keep talking about, not because of the "moe" label per say, but just because I hear the KyoAni shows branded as that so much. Just out of curiosity, what shows pop up into your mind, anyone, when you hear the term moe? I don't think there are many shows that are taken seriously outside of KyoAni, even inside the Moe-Fandom. Anything moe seems to be just comedies and ecchi romances... For me, there doesn't seem to be anything out there all that interesting to watch for my tastes. Where is that editor who loves only moe shows that could watch all the series that are out there and give a good to scale review on all of them...

This is probably not helpful, because few of these are licensed (there's a reason...):

Akane-Iro ni Somaru Saka
Canvas
Da Capo
Ef ~A tale of memories/melodies~
Futakoi
Futakoi Alternative
Goshuushou-sama Ninomiya-kun
Ichigo 100%
I"S Pure
Kannagi (arguable, but they don't entirely resist the standard arc)
Kimikiss Pure Rouge
Lamune
Mamoru-kun ni Megamino Shukufuku Wo
Rumbling Hearts
Tokimeki Memorial

Now, I'm not generalizing. They don't all completely fit that formula (light to dark scale), and I could get arguments on some of them. But all I was trying to do was agree with you, actually. Clannad definitely is light and humorous at the beginning, though I'm experienced enough now to catch the hints. I knew it wasn't a romcom, but a romcom-go-drama. It was a reasonably good show, not high on my list of all anime, but I'll watch the second season someday.

On the above list, my favorites, that do rank in my top 50 anyway, are Ef ~A tale of memories~, I"S Pure (now licensed), Kannagi, and Futakoi Alternative (probably shouldn't be on such a list anyway), and yes, definitely, Toradora. Admittedly, I didn't finish all of them. Lamune is not bad, but it's been awhile, so my opinion might change on re-watching.

This is just a partial list. I stopped at "L" and tossed in a couple others I recalled. Also, anything not still available as fansubs before 2 years ago isn't there, and if a show was licensed but didn't end up on a Top 100 list somewhere, then I wouldn't have even rented it.

I figured it would make the point, being very few of this genre actually get licensed, because any one of these would be a niche title in the U.S. If you like dramedies, you might find more to like than I did. I'm not a big fan, and a series has to "exceed the genre" for me to appreciate it.


And if you want moe that is high quality, I'll just point you to Higurashi (When They Cry). You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll cringe, you'll be surprised.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Agent355



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Posts: 5113
Location: Crackberry in hand, thumbs at the ready...
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:17 am Reply with quote
As a new viewer who is unfamiliar with theese types of shows and is interested in trying them out, I find the labels "moe" and "harem" confusing. Can we get a Bechdel rule to separate fan-service and loli comedies from more genuine, heartfelt emottional fare?

Something like: 1. Not every character is trying to sleep with/catch the romantic attentions of the opposite sex protagonist 2. There is a limit to fanservice and slapstick and 3. There are attempts by the protagonist to help the other characters without ulterior (romantic or sexual) motives?

Simply stated, if the show is like Fruits Basket with a male lead I'd like to see it, if it's like Love Hina or Kodomo no Jikan, I'd rather avoid it. Terms like "moe," "harem," and "characters who are supposed to be 17 but look 12," don't help differentiate the two types of shows. Comments about being "guilty pleasures," certainly don't help, either.

For instance, I don't usually watch giant robot shows, but if a show happens to have giant robots (Flag, Full Metal Panic, even Code Geass) but isn't defined by them, I'm more likely to watch them than the latest Gundam incarnation. Knowing the difference between the two shows helps me decide. Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flaed



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 54
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:43 am Reply with quote
I also have always found ANN's reviews of shows to be pretty fair in general, and certainly for "moe" things. Even when I might disagree with one there's always enough information to let me make my own choice (like, recently, with Angelic Layer, though that's kind of an old review). The one time I ignored an ANN review because I thought they must be biased I ended up with the only DVD purchase I still regret making (Someday's Dreamers).

I liked Clannad, and I even have re-watched parts of my set, but it's still not perfect. Fuuko and Kotomi are childish, and I wish the show had more of a focus on Tomoya and Nagisa. The pacing is sometimes very choppy and the dialogue is sometimes very bland. The humor was kind of hit-or-miss for me. I wish the cast was more balanced out, gender-wise.

On the other hand, I think Clannad tells a much more linear story than Kanon did - the other girls are as much involved in these storylines as Tomoya (I'd argue Nagisa and her family were more important than Tomoya in the Fuuko storyline), which avoids the "restart" feeling Kanon had. I think that aside from Fuuko and Kotomi and maybe Ryou, it does a fairly good job of making its cast into more than archetypes. And aside from Nagisa and Kyou, nobody's interested in Tomoya romantically. The focus of the show is really on family, not romance.

I understand that people can get upset because they have a very strong emotional connection to these shows - that's why they're "moe," after all - but you shouldn't take a review personally, and the fact that something like Clannad depends so strongly on audience goodwill is not really a point in its favor.

I don't think you can find a review on this website that's written with more love than the reviews for Kamichu!, a show which I think is often considered. . .moe. And the reviews for shows like Pani Poni Dash!, Strawberry Marshmallow, Rumbling Hearts, Air, Kanon, and, hey, Clannad. . .are all mostly positive.

Then again my reaction to the Nanoha review was more "finally, somebody who feels just like me," so maybe I'm not the best judge of these things. ^^;

Ah, wait. Bamboo never mentioned that this show has the best ending theme ever. Clearly, this is part of ANN's long-standing bias against dango. I take it all back. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
pparker



Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 1185
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:42 am Reply with quote
Agent355 wrote:
Simply stated, if the show is like Fruits Basket with a male lead I'd like to see it, if it's like Love Hina or Kodomo no Jikan, I'd rather avoid it.

Can I just say, with all due respect, that's a pretty frickin' broad brush you're painting with! Smile You've pretty much axed every moe-character show out there that contains even minor fanservice. Of course, if that's what you intended, then fine. You'll be hard-pressed to find a dramedy though that doesn't contain some fanservice and harem characteristics without being a complete tear-fest, and even there... I find Love Hina to be a quite respectable character story in the end, regardless of the minor, comedic fanservice (i.e., with Ikkitousen being the upper end of that scale--barely qualifying for public broadcast in Japan). It has some fairly dramatic elements, but I wouldn't push it into dramedy. I do get the point that you want to know if it's Girls Bravo or Air.

Flaed wrote:
I don't think you can find a review on this website that's written with more love than the reviews for Kamichu!, a show which I think is often considered. . .moe. And the reviews for shows like Pani Poni Dash!, Strawberry Marshmallow, Rumbling Hearts, Air, Kanon, and, hey, Clannad. . .are all mostly positive.

You're right, and every one of those shows absolutely utilize moe in their character designs. Kamichu! and Strawberry Marshmallow are two of my favorites, both saturated with moe. There isn't a fanservice bone in them, though, besides that generalization that all moe is by definition fanservice. Any family, setting aside certain belief systems, could watch either of these shows without embarrassment. That's my measure of sexualization as fanservice content.

The character designs have little to do with whether or not I like the show. I do get tired of the monotony in designs in these high school settings. Though still somewhat moe, I appreciated the difference in the ef series. In School Days as well, because they remind me of Masakazu Katsura's characters, which I love. I enjoy Please Teacher/Twins as well, because the stories go beyond the fanservice, though they of course contain too much fanservice for some people to ignore. Mizuho Kazami breaks the mold in being a fairly mature but attractive lead character in a moe show with a standard romance plot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:48 am Reply with quote
Zac wrote:

I just got Lyrical Nanoha A's in the mail from Funimation and I have no idea if we should even bother reviewing this or not at this point.
Zac, don't give up the ship just yet. I'm just as tired of listening to a bunch of moe weeaboos bemoaning that their favourite bedtime story is not adored the same way, as they are that the general public just don’t get the point of it and just call it as they see it. No one can please everyone, and some just need to grow up, no matter what their age is, so it’s best to do what is right for ANN as you as executive editor see fit. I find the reviews here well balanced whether I like what is being reviewed, or not. Please continue with that.

At our UK news site they also have reviews, but they also allow for any one to agree, or disagree with it by writing their own short review with reasons why they saw it that way. But any whinging and whining, or personal attacks are deleted ASAP, no if, ands, or buts. One can critique the review, but not the reviewer. Perhaps this is something that should be taken on board here as it works very well there at eliminating the playground like bickering. Just a suggestion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
belvadeer





PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:19 pm Reply with quote
Clannad, I need to finish that. Since I'm a big fan of Air and Kanon, I'm surprised at myself for not being as diligent watching it.
Back to top
Flaed



Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Posts: 54
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:26 pm Reply with quote
Agent355 wrote:
Something like: 1. Not every character is trying to sleep with/catch the romantic attentions of the opposite sex protagonist 2. There is a limit to fanservice and slapstick and 3. There are attempts by the protagonist to help the other characters without ulterior (romantic or sexual) motives?


Clannad passes all of those tests (well - it has a lot of slapstick humor, but barely any sexual fanservice). Tomoya has zero romantic interest in any of the girls at this point except for maybe Nagisa, and aside from Nagisa only one other girl really has any interest in him. His attempts at helping out the various other characters are entirely platonic. As I said above, the focus is honestly on family and not as much romance.

I would rent it before buying it, though. It's a very sweet and sentimental show with a very lovable cast, but I think you will either find it touching or ludicrously overdone (or a weird mix of both).

pparker wrote:
You're right, and every one of those shows absolutely utilize moe in their character designs. Kamichu! and Strawberry Marshmallow are two of my favorites, both saturated with moe. There isn't a fanservice bone in them, though, besides that generalization that all moe is by definition fanservice. Any family, setting aside certain belief systems, could watch either of these shows without embarrassment. That's my measure of sexualization as fanservice content.


I love Kamichu! - if it was a food, I'd eat it every day for breakfast. Smile And I don't consider "moe" a sexual thing (if I implied that, I apologize). To be honest, I don't really consider it a genre either (or rather once you leave visual novel based stuff it's really hard to classify - Aria isn't moe, but Kamichu! is, and I really have no idea why). As an emotion, moe is something rather precious to me, but it's mostly not elicited by moe things. Certainly not by Clannad.

My point was more that ANN has given plenty of "moe" shows high marks in the past for being quality shows, the same way they will give quality shoujo high marks and quality mecha high marks. And things that are more genre pieces - like, in my own opinion, Nanoha, but also GaoGaiGar and Buso Renkin - they're going to be more harsh on, because they will appeal to people who are pre-disposed to like it and not so much to other people. The review of Clannad was actually positive overall, and all the problems Bamboo noted seemed entirely fair to me. I don't, myself, see a bias here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website My Anime
Agent355



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Posts: 5113
Location: Crackberry in hand, thumbs at the ready...
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:10 pm Reply with quote
pparker wrote:
Agent355 wrote:
Simply stated, if the show is like Fruits Basket with a male lead I'd like to see it, if it's like Love Hina or Kodomo no Jikan, I'd rather avoid it.

Can I just say, with all due respect, that's a pretty frickin' broad brush you're painting with! Smile You've pretty much axed every moe-character show out there that contains even minor fanservice. Of course, if that's what you intended, then fine. You'll be hard-pressed to find a dramedy though that doesn't contain some fanservice and harem characteristics without being a complete tear-fest, and even there... I find Love Hina to be a quite respectable character story in the end, regardless of the minor, comedic fanservice (i.e., with Ikkitousen being the upper end of that scale--barely qualifying for public broadcast in Japan). It has some fairly dramatic elements, but I wouldn't push it into dramedy. I do get the point that you want to know if it's Girls Bravo or Air.

Flaed wrote:
I don't think you can find a review on this website that's written with more love than the reviews for Kamichu!, a show which I think is often considered. . .moe. And the reviews for shows like Pani Poni Dash!, Strawberry Marshmallow, Rumbling Hearts, Air, Kanon, and, hey, Clannad. . .are all mostly positive.

You're right, and every one of those shows absolutely utilize moe in their character designs. Kamichu! and Strawberry Marshmallow are two of my favorites, both saturated with moe. There isn't a fanservice bone in them, though, besides that generalization that all moe is by definition fanservice. Any family, setting aside certain belief systems, could watch either of these shows without embarrassment. That's my measure of sexualization as fanservice content.
.


Ever seen FB? It has fanservice (Yuki in a dress! Nude dudes!), a character who is supposed to be a teen but acts like he's six, lots of slapstick (mostly btw. The males characters), and more melodrama than comedy, IMHO. It even has (reverse) harem elements (one girl living with 3 guys). No different than what people here are saying Key shows have-just a gender reversal. We're not sexist here, are we? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mohawk52



Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 8202
Location: England, UK
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:22 pm Reply with quote
Agent355 wrote:
Ever seen FB? It has fanservice (Yuki in a dress! Nude dudes!), a character who is supposed to be a teen but acts like he's six, lots of slapstick (mostly btw. The males characters), and more melodrama than comedy, IMHO. It even has (reverse) harem elements (one girl living with 3 guys). No different than what people here are saying Key shows have-just a gender reversal. We're not sexist here, are we? Wink
How you could even remotely compare Clannad with Fruits Basket, I have no idea. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordPrometheus





PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:25 pm Reply with quote
Zac wrote:

I just got Lyrical Nanoha A's in the mail from Funimation and I have no idea if we should even bother reviewing this or not at this point


Please do. I've actually been looking forward to this site's review of Nanoha A's ever since I bought the boxset. Although, I don't really think that Nanoha qualifies as "moe"; it's more like "magical girl show with cute designs". If cute character designs is all that's needed to define a show as fitting into the "moe genre" these days, then I guess I need to update my lexicon.

Ironically, it was the firestorm over the last Nanoha review that got me into the series in the first place. Go figure. I guess good things can come from forum wars after all. Wink
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 13 of 16

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group