View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15567
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:59 pm
|
|
|
Please be Kodansha. Please be Kodansha.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tofusensei
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 365
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:38 am
|
|
|
"manga publisher"?
They are more a novel publisher than anything
|
Back to top |
|
|
samuelp
Industry Insider
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2248
Location: San Antonio, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:32 am
|
|
|
Tofusensei wrote: | "manga publisher"?
They are more a novel publisher than anything |
Hey now, in the publishing biz it's WAY more cool and hip to be a "manga publisher" than a "novel publisher".
Plain text is SOO 20th century.
|
Back to top |
|
|
BluWacky
Joined: 17 Jul 2002
Posts: 16
Location: Oxford, England
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:29 am
|
|
|
The announcement of Ubume no Natsu is hardly new, it's been listed on Vertical's own website since at least last summer (when I was furiously Googling for any information on Mouryou no Hako!). The original release date for the novel was May 09 (and still is on Amazon) - has this now been pushed back?
|
Back to top |
|
|
invalidname
Contributor
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 2482
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:05 am
|
|
|
Well, yay for Vertical. They've put out some excellent stuff (I've read Buddha and To Terra, just started Black Jack yesterday), even if it's not real appealing (yet) to typical manga fans. Don't know why they feel the need to flip some of their titles, though.
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuuma_monou
Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 1852
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 7:43 am
|
|
|
invalidname wrote: | Don't know why they feel the need to flip some of their titles, though. |
In the case of BUDDHA, I assume they're aiming for a wider audience that isn't used to reading unflipped manga.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|