View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Cherry Root
Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:23 am
|
|
|
does anyone know why the ParaKiss manga has a 16+ age rating? just wondering
|
Back to top |
|
|
kolibri
Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 712
Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:04 pm
|
|
|
It has sex scenes and partial nudity (breasts, nipples).
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tamaria
Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 1512
Location: De Achterhoek
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:20 pm
|
|
|
Yep, but not in a fanservice kind of way, so it's pretty tame compared to what you see in other manga with the 16+ rating.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kolibri
Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 712
Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:22 pm
|
|
|
Oh totally, it's very tasteful. Ratings don't make a difference between smut and art though
|
Back to top |
|
|
britannicamoore
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 2618
Location: Out.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:17 pm
|
|
|
So what is the difference between the purple volumes and the white ones? Because I keep seeing the purple ones and I want to know if should grab them or not.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kolibri
Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 712
Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:20 pm
|
|
|
Purple ones are first edition, white ones are the second (newest) edition. I understand the white ones have some editing improvements like typos fixed etc but I haven't actually compared them myself.
|
Back to top |
|
|
fighterholic
Joined: 28 Sep 2005
Posts: 9193
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:12 am
|
|
|
kolibri wrote: | Oh totally, it's very tasteful. Ratings don't make a difference between smut and art though |
Also don't forget that different companies have different ratings as well for their series.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Not a Jellyfish
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:45 pm
|
|
|
Also, although I'm not entirely sure, I think the first editions (purple volumes) had flipped art. Whereas the new editions are printed Japanese style. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, though, as I'm not 100 percent sure.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kyokun703
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 2505
Location: Orgrimmar
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:59 pm
|
|
|
Not a Jellyfish wrote: | Also, although I'm not entirely sure, I think the first editions (purple volumes) had flipped art. Whereas the new editions are printed Japanese style. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, though, as I'm not 100 percent sure. |
Nope. I have 4 whites and 1 purple, and the purple is Japanese style, unflipped. I wouldn't've bought it otherwise. I would've liked my fifth volume to match, but it was delayed for the longest time, and I gave up.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Not a Jellyfish
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:01 pm
|
|
|
kyokun703 wrote: |
Not a Jellyfish wrote: | Also, although I'm not entirely sure, I think the first editions (purple volumes) had flipped art. Whereas the new editions are printed Japanese style. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, though, as I'm not 100 percent sure. |
Nope. I have 4 whites and 1 purple, and the purple is Japanese style, unflipped. I wouldn't've bought it otherwise. I would've liked my fifth volume to match, but it was delayed for the longest time, and I gave up. |
Ah, thank you for clarifying. I'm sorry for my false information. -.-;;
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirbyboy102
Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 157
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:36 pm
|
|
|
the purple editions have a different logo and original cover art, white has new logo and cover art, and errors fixed up.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|