Forum - View topicEpisode Review: Akame ga KILL!
Goto page Previous Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surrender Artist
Posts: 3264 Location: Pennsylvania, USA |
|
|||||
Dude, do you ever just let anything go or gracefully agree to disagree or even flipping edit yourself? Every time you get involved with a thread it ends up being TEXT FOREVER any most everybody else just wants nothing to do with it or turns out to need to eat or sleep, thus precluding wanting to deal with you. I don't know if you thrive on conflict to a psychotic degree or whatever, but you're basically drowning discussion for the rest of the world and turning every thread you're involved with into a superfund cleanup site.
As for Akama ga KILL!, it seems like a pretty nasty, joyless show. It might have jokes, but jokes can be pretty joyless. And joyless isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it seems like it's an unpleasantly exploitative joylessness borne of surrendering any real perspective or insight for an artlessly grotesque parody of OMFG DARK MAN (Directed by Sam Raimi). One or another, this thread has made me glad that I stayed away. Last edited by Surrender Artist on Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||
PachiPortrait
Posts: 34 Location: Raleigh, NC |
|
|||||
If you bothered to fully grasp her comparison, you'd find she was being quite fair, giving both series the benefit of the doubt and analyzing those particular jokes justly.
It's obvious what you're trying to do. You're trying to *shock* us with your interpretation of the KLK scene. Meanwhile, you describe the situation in AgK in the simplest of terms and don't expunge on how it paints a picture against the series as a whole. Who exactly is being unfair here? You also keep bringing the discussion back to Bulat as a character, which is 100% not even close to what this is about. At all. |
||||||
ChibiKangaroo
Posts: 2941 |
|
|||||
It takes two to tango my friend. I stand by my positions and i'm not afraid to argue them just as much as anyone else. But thank you for the silly personal attacks. At least we know you understand how to address a point and not just engage in ad hominem.
No, I am quite literally describing exactly what happened in each example, as closely as I possibly can. This simply illustrates the clarity of my point. |
||||||
JacobC
ANN Contributor
Posts: 3728 Location: SoCal |
|
|||||
Okay, you're right on that count. Honestly, I didn't remember the scene either, and didn't look it up when I saw you referencing it, I just went by my vague memory and the gif. So, it's worse than I described it because I wasn't remembering it correctly. My bad. Regardless, this still doesn't affect the main point I was making which is "you can't police the opinions of others by comparing incomparable works against each other and saying that if you like one, you have to like another," etc. Particularly because I'm not excusing the tasteless jokes in either work, but you are. Both shows have inappropriate jokes in them. In both cases, I don't excuse the material, I just happen to like one of those shows in spite of it, but not the other. The whole fooforah started, however, because you and some other people in the thread were demanding that dissenters acknowledge the vile content in Akame ga Kill as actually progressive and smart and commentative or whatever, or else be condemned as stuffy biased critics who didn't get it. And that's silly. (No matter how many times you describe and re-describe it, the thing with Bulat is "make gay panic jokes for two episodes, stop making them, then give him some sympathetic character traits one episode before killing him, the end." It's just bad writing, nothing more nothing less.) The only reason I was even comparing the two instances is because you were extremely adamant about it being done. I prefaced and epilogued the comparison with "There is no valid point in doing this, I'm just humoring you because you keep pushing the issue," and that's still how I feel about it. Bringing up Kill La Kill was irrelevant several pages ago, and it's still irrelevant now. Akame ga Kill! is real gross and people probably shouldn't call it thought-provoking or progressive because that makes them seem real gross, especially if they use it to personally attack dissenting writers, which, you're right, you personally were not doing, but a lot of other people were. I don't think there's anything else I have to say about it, this is gettin' real dumb. I think I'm done. Last edited by JacobC on Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||
Shadowrun20XX
Posts: 1936 Location: Vegas |
|
|||||
None of you can watch a show for what it is anymore. The trivial spinning is so damn sad. Soapboxing even though its against the rules.
|
||||||
ChibiKangaroo
Posts: 2941 |
|
|||||
Thanks. To be honest, like I said I didn't even remember exactly how it played out, I just remembered that it was bad. So I shouldn't blame you in that regard.
Point taken. And I am not really trying to police thoughts. I'm trying my best to argue this point, and yes I acknowledge that it is a highly subjective point to argue. Yes, I am willing to agree that the way Tatsumi reacted to Bulat initially was discriminatory. I don't hide from that. I just feel like the show elevated both characters far beyond that. The second scene with the villain and Wave is still a question mark. Maybe it will be a detracting point for the show, but I still feel strongly that the Tatsumi/Bulat relationship arc was handled in an extremely positive way.
|
||||||
phoenix72
Posts: 31 |
|
|||||
i was originally not going to jump in to this but i feel the need. ok so in regards to the intro scenes to Bulat and Stylish i have an actual example from my life that can back up Tatsumi and waves' reactions (at the very least it supports Waves') in middle school i only had one best friend we hung out all the time in and out of school and at some point he felt the need to start asking some strange questions (i now know that he was trying to get an handle on his sexual orientation and he was using me as a baseline) i found it really strange. regardless we stopped hanging out both in school and out (100% sure that the questions had nothing to do with the reason. the reason being that i got into anime and became a shut in marathoning everything that caught my eye http://myanimelist.net/animelist/phoenix7240 http://www.mangaupdates.com/mylist.html?id=184743&list=read). anyway in my second year of highschool we started hanging out again. at some point he felt the need to tell me he was gay and he used to have a crush on me. my reaction mirrored Wave's with the added thoughts of "oh! the questions make sense now". BTW we are still good friends. my point is being straight and knowing that a guy is or was into you is kinda unnerving, and alot of times you dont know how to properly respond so you jerk back and go well now what how do i deal with this. my solution was to treat him the same as always. it's not as if he suddenly was a different person. yes the joke was bad in a everything must be politically correct sort of way. but whatever its fiction. i watch anime and read manga to escape reality. the show isnt progressive at least not it the way some of you are saying it is. Last edited by phoenix72 on Tue Sep 02, 2014 11:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||||
Redcrimson
Posts: 160 |
|
|||||
If I think that Kill la Kill and Akame ga Kill are both offensive, mindless schlock, do I get some kind of special sticker or something?
|
||||||
enurtsol
Posts: 14886 |
|
|||||
But that's such a prevalent example people provide what makes anime "mature."
Ya get to hang out with Tarantino. |
||||||
Tuor_of_Gondolin
Posts: 3524 Location: Bellevue, WA |
|
|||||
It's okay to soapbox if you're somehow furthering some Social Justice crusade. |
||||||
Mr. Nescio
Posts: 165 |
|
|||||
I am up to date with the manga and the anime and my feelings about the series are close to what Blood- wrote in his post preceding mine.
I am quite confused about the fact that in addition of one poster, even Chapman, who I consider to be more intelligent than an average reviewer, claims that the show is outright hateful towards women. Of course, the female characters fit well to the tropes that are common in otaku media (especially eroge, as the writer of the manga has a lot of experience in that genre), but where is the actual hate? I have more arguments of why I don't think Akame ga Kill! is a misogynistic show, but I don't have time now to write them all down. Rather, first I would like to see some evidence of the contrary opinion. |
||||||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24124 |
|
|||||
I can never understand the inclination to make detailed and specific condemnations (or praise for that matter) of a show without actually watching some of it yourself. Given your bias, no doubt watching some of it would simply confirm your preconceptions, but at least you wouldn't be writing from a place of ignorance.
This one makes me scratch my head, as well. Anime's portrayal of women is, sadly, often retrograde (ditto its treatment of gay characters) but I haven't seen any indication that AgK is a particularly egregious offender. I don't want to reopen the comparison controversy, but I find female representation in the JoJo franchise (one of my favourite shows of all time) to be far more cringe-worthy (in the rare moments that a female character is actually around). |
||||||
zensunni
Posts: 1294 |
|
|||||
I am not watching this show, yet, but I may marathon it later. I am posting to nitpick the review and, in short, be a grammar Nazi.
The word capitol refers to a building or group of buildings where a government makes laws and carries out the act of governing. It does not refer to the city where those buildings are built. That word is capital. (See the third set of definitions, noun, definition number 3...) So, unless the character was on a journey specifically to the building or set of buildings in the capital that are called the capitol building(s), this is wrong. (The later comment about finding an entire city full of evil politicians indicates that the reference is to the city, not the buildings.) Examples: "Washington D.C. is the capital of the United States." "While visiting Washington D.C. one may tour the U.S. Capitol building, where congress meets to make laws." Sure, it is a small point, but when it is in the first paragraph of the review it starts the reader off on a sour note. It leaves the impression that either the author or the editors, or both, are not really on the ball and doesn't lead one to weigh the opinions expressed in the review very heavily. (This is not a conscious decision, but a gut reaction to the grammatical error. The more issues of that sort the reader spots, the lower the review falls in terms of credibility. Just the nature of the beast.) |
||||||
Yttrbio
Posts: 3670 |
|
|||||
|
||||||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24124 |
|
|||||
|
||||||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group