×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 9 months old before posting.

Forum - View topic
INTEREST: Makoto Shinkai Comments on Anime Producer Kouichirou Itou's Arrest




Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MFrontier



Joined: 13 Apr 2014
Posts: 14216
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:16 pm Reply with quote
Pretty reasonable response under the circumstances.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cryten



Joined: 19 Jan 2019
Posts: 1162
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:36 pm Reply with quote
It is unfortunate when the boundary between fantasy and reality breaks down. It is a very touchy area where people struggle to recognise those boundary area's. And conflict erupts between art, entertainment and the harm caused to very real people.

One thing I have discussed between geeky friends is the benefits in early exposure to both fantasy literature and DnD. Where you can teach young people the difference between creating a story and real life, of being in character vs real life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rogueywon



Joined: 01 May 2011
Posts: 265
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 7:49 pm Reply with quote
He's said what he needed to say. That's pretty unequivocal, particularly by Japanese standards. Credit where it's due etc.

Questions about separating the creator from the creation are always difficult. In this case, my instinct is to say that Shinkai is the driving creative force, so the works in question remain "untainted". But there's a nasty question bobbing in the back of my mind about royalties.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gray Lensman



Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Posts: 145
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2024 8:50 pm Reply with quote
Rogueywon wrote:
He's said what he needed to say. That's pretty unequivocal, particularly by Japanese standards. Credit where it's due etc.

Questions about separating the creator from the creation are always difficult. In this case, my instinct is to say that Shinkai is the driving creative force, so the works in question remain "untainted". But there's a nasty question bobbing in the back of my mind about royalties.


The producer is just the money man - as you said, Shinkai is the driving creative force. I have a copy of Your Name purchased shortly after it became available on DVD, so I most likely already gave cash to the producer, sadly. But I can at least watch it again without giving him anymore, and enjoy the work of the people who made the film.

I wonder if there is a way to pry any payments away from someone, or if they even still get them long after the film was released?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRosencraft



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 675
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:36 am Reply with quote
[quote="Gray Lensman"]
Rogueywon wrote:
...
I wonder if there is a way to pry any payments away from someone, or if they even still get them long after the film was released?


Generally speaking, no. There is little likelihood that a contract for royalties (assuming he is due any) would contain a morality clause for a producer. Also unlikely that such a contract would have any claw-back provisions for past earnings. And it is usually not plausible for someone to have their contract earnings clawed back for actions that take place after or otherwise separate from the work they were contracted to do (again, unless there is specific contract language to allow it). A company is certainly able to try, but it's unlikely that a court is going to allow for that to take place - essentially enforce contract terms the parties never negotiated. It's a tricky situation to navigate, but unfortunately there's unlikely a lot that can be done directly. They could always try to sue for damages under a theory that this has caused harm to the brand or reputation, but that would, at this point, be hard to do and be little different (in terms of effect and in terms of required evidence) from the attempts at invalidating the contract itself. The biggest hit this guy can receive right now is going to be suit by the victims, and/or loss of present and future work. Past earnings are otherwise likley off limits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
WoodDude



Joined: 22 Dec 2022
Posts: 72
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:17 am Reply with quote
Sad he had to comment on this at all, but I saw people insinuating he was in on it with Itou so no doubt this should hopefully put those rumors to rest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChirashiD



Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 204
Location: WA
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 7:48 am Reply with quote
WoodDude wrote:
Sad he had to comment on this at all, but I saw people insinuating he was in on it with Itou so no doubt this should hopefully put those rumors to rest.
I believe such insinuations, if any, could be interpreted differently. Makoto himself, in that tweet the article is referencing, said he was aware assumptions and social media could be generating backlash about him. Acknowledging rumors exist is better than fooling yourself they can be "put to rest."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CrypticPurpose



Joined: 15 Jan 2020
Posts: 341
PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 9:57 pm Reply with quote
I continue to be exceptionally curious about how this came to light during an unrelated prostitution investigation. I just can't think of very many circumstances under which that would be a possible result. We'll probably never get an answer, either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nyaa



Joined: 27 Oct 2022
Posts: 159
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:08 am Reply with quote
You (and everybody else) don't need to know because it's really none of your business. I don't think Shinkai had to say anything thing about it but he did because he felt that he needed to quash any rumors that some gossipers might have started spreading. Such is the sad state of the world we live in these days.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Philmister978



Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Posts: 336
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2024 8:17 pm Reply with quote
nyaa wrote:
You (and everybody else) don't need to know because it's really none of your business. I don't think Shinkai had to say anything thing about it but he did because he felt that he needed to quash any rumors that some gossipers might have started spreading. Such is the sad state of the world we live in these days.


Sad but true. The internet, especially social media, love to jump on bandwagons like this until someone who isn't the offender suffers. Be it a friend not in the know, the offender's family, or even the people arguing with each other on Social Media (or the mods forced to deal with the BS that comes from it).

Way I see it, while he didn't have to, in this climate where people love to play the blame game, troll and harass people who don't deserve it and send death threats to any and everyone that offends the accuser(s) like it's deeply personal to them. Shinkai's totally justified by speaking up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group