Forum - View topicApparently, lazy animators are the real problem today and should be replaced by AI
|
Author | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
MrPuzzles
Posts: 152 |
|
||
At least, according to Tomohisa Taguchi.
Link to full article/interview: https://fullfrontal.moe/taguchi-hara-annecy2023/ |
|||
AsleepBySunset
Posts: 246 |
|
||
AI writing scares me more than animation since you will never be able to tell if a story had ai """assisted""" writing. I don't give a shit about "ideas are a dime a dozen", I want stories where humans decided what happens next and used their imagination. AI generated stories seems like some kind of addictive simulation of being a pantser where you get to discover where """"your""" story goes without even writing it meaning its a surprise for you reading it. Except you never wrote it, it's not your story.
Depending on how cynical I'm feeling, my mood ranges from "good thing civilisation's going to collapse soon" to "lord I'm never consuming an anime made after the date 20XX excluding the obligatory final, final, final miyazaki movie" again. |
|||
MrPuzzles
Posts: 152 |
|
||
I'm not completely against the idea of using AI to, like, fix grammatical mistakes and whatnot, but it should be a tool to help artists, not replace them.
|
|||
Boughtsed
Posts: 2 |
|
||
Creative ideas belong to animators. AI cannot think of imaginative and creative ideas, in my opinion. You know, most of the AI tools are trained by large data, which are existing facts but not creative new things. AI just combines and imitates the features in the data but cannot have its own style, like the brush of Van Gogh.
For example, one of the AI art tools I used is picso, it can draw Van Gogh style art, but it never gives me a style surpassing that. So, AI will not replace creative-thinking animators. But it may replace those who stop thinking but always do the same work. |
|||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24475 |
|
||
I work for a TV and film production company and my boss is convinced we'll all be out of work in five years. I think that is overly pessimistic, but change is 'a-comin'. We are not far from the time when a single person - with the help of AI tools - will be able to create high quality, commercially viable, fictional content, live-action or animated (or a blend) entirely by themselves, whether that's movies, TV series or anything else.
|
|||
Blood-
Bargain Hunter
Posts: 24475 |
|
||
I think it's too early to predict how creative AI will ultimately be. In the short term, instead of completely replacing human input, I think we'll see the rise of "AI whisperers" - i.e. humans using AI tools - to create content.
I don't think we are far away from programs where ordinary joes and janes like you and me will say to it: "Use these images of people I know and some famous people and make me a 90 minute movie set in Venice during the 15th century that's basically a thriller with a strong love story" and the program will whip up something. Whether that something is anything anybody wants to watch is, of course, an open question. |
|||
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar Posts: 16974 |
|
||
My guess is most would be comedy/meme fodder and not worth much else. Even as the AI and chat bots etc get more advanced, they still will lack critical nuance. In the end though the whole thing is about money. The more companies (on average) can use AI and pay workers less the happier they are. Scan someone's face and voice and then never pay them again. Even if the bot movies bomb they didn't pay millions and millions to staff and actors so the monetary loss would probably be greatly lessened in the event of box office bombs. |
|||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group