View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
MoonPhase1
Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 499
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:50 pm
|
|
|
I think infant death syndrome with also elderly people falling are just too different than videogames. Not to mention that they waited so long to sue Nintendo. Smells like a quick cash grab to me.
And since this is about motion-sensing, then I guess Sony violated it too with the Sixaxis controls and the PS Move.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blueno
Joined: 21 Feb 2011
Posts: 46
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:53 pm
|
|
|
Damn. Nintendo on point with their legal game. They will pull through the next appeal. Everybody wants a piece of the pie. But Nintendo ain't the sharing type.
Last edited by Blueno on Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
Top Gun
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 4788
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:33 pm
|
|
|
Patent trolls are terrible.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kadmos1
Joined: 08 May 2014
Posts: 13615
Location: In Phoenix but has an 85308 ZIP
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:51 pm
|
|
|
An IP maximalist company slammed with a patent suit is somewhat ironic.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Oshawott
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 6773
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:14 pm
|
|
|
These patent trolls are simply desperate to get a piece of Nintendo's hotcakes with these frivolous lawsuits. Here's hoping stuff will work out in Nintendo's favor in the appeals process.
|
Back to top |
|
|
R315r4z0r
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 717
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:09 pm
|
|
|
Isn't the point of a patent to prevent other companies from profiting off of your ideas and stealing away your gains?
I mean, I might just not be in the know... but I'm preeeeety sure Nintendo doesn't sell any infant and/or elderly monitors.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pelfmiester
Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:13 am
|
|
|
MoonPhase1 wrote: | I think infant death syndrome with also elderly people falling are just too different than videogames. Not to mention that they waited so long to sue Nintendo. Smells like a quick cash grab to me.
And since this is about motion-sensing, then I guess Sony violated it too with the Sixaxis controls and the PS Move. |
Exactly. How is Nintendo making a Wii remote damaging the business of a company monitoring babies and the elderly? They have nothing to do with each other.
|
Back to top |
|
|
sk1199
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 162
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:37 am
|
|
|
It's not that Nintendo is taking sales away from the other company. It's that the other company spent time/money developing a technology to sense motion (I guess) and then Nintendo just comes by and says "Thanks for developing this tech." Just because Nintendo isn't using the technology in direct competition with the developer doesn't give it the right to use the developers' patents without permission.
At least that's the basis for allegation in the suit.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tenbyakugon
Joined: 11 Jan 2012
Posts: 797
Location: Ohio, United States
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:31 am
|
|
|
Opportunistic.
|
Back to top |
|
|
ParaChomp
Joined: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 1018
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:14 pm
|
|
|
Serves them right. Hope they learn. Doubt they will.
|
Back to top |
|
|
TarsTarkas
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5925
Location: Virginia, United States
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:10 am
|
|
|
If Nintendo actually used iLife's technology for their Wii remotes, without asking permission or paying to use that technology, then iLife are not patent trolls. Patent trolls are people, organizations and companies, that vaguely patent everything under the sun, and probably the sun too.
|
Back to top |
|
|
CrownKlown
Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 1762
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:03 pm
|
|
|
Yeah some people completely missed the point, the patents and copyright/TM are too different things. What the specific patent is actually used for is irrelevant as long as the actually technology was infrigined upon so trying to handwave this by saying Nintendo makes games not medical devices is a moot point.
Also Nintendo has probably one of the best legal departments in the game because they are so big and always tend to be sued, I wonder why, so I don't really think this is as much a case of Nintendo winning on merit but having the deeper pockets to appeal after appeal.
I've never called Nintendo original, they are kind of like Apple, they just taking existing ideas and perfect them and market them, but pretty much all of their innovation from their handhelds to things like the wii/wiiu/3d are all just lifted ideas.
|
Back to top |
|
|
kusanagi-sama
Joined: 22 Aug 2004
Posts: 1723
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:19 pm
|
|
|
I'm sure they made their patent generic enough so they could more easily sue someone using a piece of technology with something that might look like theirs. In this case, they went after Nintendo.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Galap
Moderator
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 2354
|
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:22 pm
|
|
|
That's actually not that much money for something like this.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|