Forum - View topicPR: Crunchyroll to Simulcast Rozen Maiden Zurückspulen Anime for Summer 2013
Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
Author | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
Talon87
Posts: 89 |
|
||
Just throwing it out there so we get this clarified for the newcomers and the old fans alike once and for all:
1) Zurückspulen is not a reboot. (Soft spoilers for Episodes 01 and 02.) spoiler[The first episode does recap the events from the prologue chapters plus Phases 01 thru 43 (i.e. the forty-five manga chapters published with Peach Pit's first publisher), but starting with next week's episode we will be at the very beginning of Tale 01 of the manga, i.e. the start of Part II which was published via Peach Pit's second publisher.] 2) Part II of the manga is not a reboot either. Back when Peach Pit changed publishers, there was a lot of misinformation going around about how the new manga would be a reboot of the series. It turns out that the manga under the new publisher was a direct continuation of the original manga. Furthermore ... (spoilers that will probably stretch 10 or so episodes into this series, if I had to guess) spoiler[the original Jun is still very much the star of the franchise. The Jun of the other world is just the main character in Part II. The original Jun is the star once again in Part III, and both Parts I and III are far, far longer than Part II was.] Long story short, the so-called "new manga" is only new in that it has a new publisher behind it and chapters are now called Tales instead of Phases. That's ... pretty much it. You wouldn't call Tolkien's The Two Towers a reboot of Fellowship of the Ring. It's very much the same situation here. 3) Zurückspulen is a recalibration of the anime. What I mean by that is, Zurückspulen does seek to address several of the major differences between the TV adaptations of the mid-2000s and the source material. It is aiming to tell a story which is more manga-faithful than past adaptations have been. Or at least, that's this viewer's impression after having watched the first episode. I am a little concerned by one or two liberties Deen did take though ... spoiler[for one thing, why did we go from Winnie-the-Pooh (manga) to a clown (2004 anime) to Suigin Tou herself (2013 anime) being Shinku's assailant in Jun's bedroom? For another thing, why did they act as though Hina Ichigo never became Shinku's servant?] ... but I suspect that Studio Deen took the first of those artistic licenses just to try and squeeze that character in as early as possible so that they could acquaint first-time viewers with her ... even though first-timer viewers really shouldn't be watching. ^^; More on that below. And as for the second license they took? I guess just general lack of time. I dunno, it's a little worrisome, but I'm not too worried just yet. I loved the original TV series plenty and lord knows it made huge changes to the manga. These new liberties are pretty minor in comparison and I don't think we're too likely to see much more like them as we press on. 4) Who is Zurückspulen for then?
|
|||
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
||
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group