×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
INTEREST: Director of Gundam SEED Thinks Anime Has Too Many Regulations


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:27 pm Reply with quote
lostrune wrote:
What Americans call fanservice and pandering, the rest of the world just sees as the natural human body
Laughing Europe, Japan.. They're not as hung up at seeing a woman's cleavage as Americans are and don't make a fuss like you see here. And if you're expecting anime to cater to American puritian tastes, you'll probably be waiting awhile.


Yeah, Americans are so puritanical about sex. That's why no one watches Game of Thrones and no other TV shows ever even suggest characters might be sleeping with each other. Oh wait, no, it's ridiculously common. The issue with fanservice is a largely separate issue and yes, you don't really see anything like it on normal TV. And while you might get more nudity in European TV shows, I very much doubt they do things like what people are referring to as fanservice in anime. (Which isn't to say it's completely absent; I heard about something in the most recent Star Trek movie that sounds like a rough equivalent, and was certainly criticized for it; it still isn't an issue of being puritan).

Seriously people, at least educate yourself on objectification and why it's a problem before you post "haha, silly Puritan Americans" like it's some big gotcha. Also fanservice doesn't seem to be what he's talking about. Regulations sure haven't stopped To-Love Ru and Damidaler from airing. But when was the last time you saw any indication that two characters actually had sex together? I have to assume he meant something like that when he referred to Flay. Also, violence is frequently censored as well. Those are both things that might actually be a concern for someone wanting to make a story. Pantyshots and boob-gropes certainly haven't gone anywhere and beams of light and steam censorship don't seem to be much of a concern either artistically or economically.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
firedragon54738



Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 3113
Location: wisconsin
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:27 pm Reply with quote
Well Japan Regulations is a lot less then the US hell I would soo like to watch Baywatch on tv again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:34 pm Reply with quote
residentgrigo wrote:
And i support Sailor Moon because it has been 15 years and Precure(the first show has alright i guess) had it´s time in the light. Sailor Moon is a international success and i kind of like the manga. The market needs the money and if the final product has the chance to be good it deserves a better adaptaion.


Pretty Cure is not irrelevant simply because you deem it as such. If your concern is money for the market, then Pretty Cure is going to blow Sailor Moon Crystal out of the water in that regard so you should embrace that as well as Toei and Sunrise's other properties for girls. Your statements are contradictory.

All these complaints just make me wonder how much anime people actually watch. Both today and in the past. People act like the 80s and 90s were devoid of sexual content and titillation. Anyone who isn't old enough to know who Lum or Machiko are should not be taking part in this discussion. The only thing that has changed over the years are the fans, more and more I see western fans becoming more close-minded over the years and throwing up buzzwords and sweeping generalizations devoid of any actual argumentative merit. I would love to see someone break down the current 80-odd shows airing on TV right now and explain why they are all bad and anime is dying, but unfortunately that requires effort and critical thinking.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ziko577



Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 136
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:38 pm Reply with quote
residentgrigo wrote:
The problem with modern anime is this: No risks anywhere, no violence/real sex or content for "film" lovers. It´s like Miyazaki said.
Too much Otaku pandering. I still don't understand how Space Bros or the new Legend of Galactic Heroes are being produced in this climate. The last 5 years had tons of great cartoons(Tron, Young Justice, Korra and so on) but most got canceled and i need anime to step up ! I now only watch Hunter X Hunter and Mushishi 2. Baby Steps is also a good manga.

I agree with the director 100%. The last tv anime with real "grit" was Baccano. I don´t need messed up stuff to like an anime (Mushishi again and The Wind Rises) but i want to watch a story and not a hugging pillow ad. Or another demon shonen action show. Where is the Till death do us part anime or Suicide island or a watanabe show witch a budged. Dandy is the best(9/10) but Kids needed twice the episodes to do the mangas justice. Or original shows like Lain. And no more pederast softcore porn. Its killing the medium !

Gundam Seed by the way isn´t that "mature". The movie version had a decent off screen beheading and the show had bloody explosions around episode 35 or something(but no gore) but nothing that can´t be shown to a 12 year old. And too many "toyetic" moments. 6,5/10. The original Gundam is better 8/10 and more violent/believable. Also it was for 8-16 year olds school boys. Seed Destiny is comedy Gold !
00 is also better and more "gritty". 8/10 but the movie was bad.

For great Gundam goodness i recommend Zeta Gundam 10/10 and Victory 9/10. Victory is the most messed up children show ever !

Rant over. Laughing


Victory is one screwed up series man. But I love it despite that. Oh, and Korra is still on but season 3 won't air until later this year. It'll be as long as the original Avatar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RokugoPeachMoon



Joined: 03 May 2014
Posts: 79
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:44 pm Reply with quote
Banjo wrote:
In my opinion, fan service ruined anime in general. Also I believe it will only get worse and worse in the future.


Uh, huh. And I'm sure that creating nothing but shows that you personally like would "save" it and "bring it back", right? Rolling Eyes

Lavnovice9 wrote:


There's so much ignorance in this thread on how people can saving the anime industry. It always boils down to catering to what they want. Very transparent soapbox. Leave it to the usual suspects to take a quote about censorship and twist it to their own agenda of being anti-otaku. residentgrigo criticizes otaku pandering then says he loves an otaku anime. Such a hypocrite. People don't even know what they're complaining about it seems like otaku pandering just means anime they don't like and anime they do like somehow aren't for otaku. Such a scapegoat


Pretty much. Articles like this are just fodder and lightning rods for the usual anti-otaku individuals on this site to come and once again repeat their tired, condescending insults and armchair "industry expertise". It's soapboxing, and nothing more.

mdo7 wrote:

And more international anime fan will continue to increase criticism (including me) because the reason I stop watching anime because of too much fanservice and less on creativity/innovation in the storyline, there's only quite a few good anime left for me to watch for the last 2 years.


Do you honestly believe that the Anime industry cares about a bunch of picky and cynical people thousands of miles away that constantly balk at release prices and rarely buy series-related merchandise in the amount that Japan fans do?

How naive. Laughing

Stuart Smith wrote:
residentgrigo, I'd just like to point out your post is a prime poster child example of anime fan entitlement. It reeks of not only entitlemnt, but lack of knowledge of the medium as a whole. You say you support the Sailor Moon remake because you want variation, but why would you support a remake of an old show over the dozens of shoujo anime currently airing? Why not support Pretty Cure, or the upcoming Puri Para which are original titles? Is it truly about variety or are you simply hunting for a nostalgia binge so you can relive 'the good old days'? Your comment on watching many American shows, and then condemning shounen series also raises an eyebrow of mine. Are any of those American shows crime dramas? Those are common like shounen are in Japan, each market has mainstream and dominate shows, so what makes one dominate genre better than another? Again, is it an issue of 'all colors' or simply an issue of your your own specific tastes not being accomindated to? Lastly, I would advise against statement such as saying the industry is on a decline or needs saving Sales have shown otherwise.

-Stuart Smith


+1

penguintruth wrote:
The problem isn't "too many boobies" in anime. The problem is that it's abused by hacks that make it like rattling keys in front of children. Shows based entirely around fanservice, that revolve solely around premises that give an excuse to use it. I guess you can say looser restrictions would just make that worse, but I think it would help the better things rise to the top as the trash sinks further and further with ludicrous plotlines.


And here is one of the "usuals" that I was talking about a few lines up.

jet_ wrote:
@ Mohawk52 and mdo7:

If your problem with recent anime is that there's too much fanservice and "moe", then the problem lies with you, not with the shows.
I don't know where you learned what "moe" is, but to everyone who does not frequent 4chan or Sankaku Complex, moe is the feeling you get for a character whose character traits appeal to you.
If you call the characters in, for example, Is The Order a Rabbit "boring moeblobs", then that just means that you're too shallow to see the depth in the characters.

Literally every anime has moe.

The amount of sexual fanservice shows versus the amount of shows that does not use sexual fanservice as its main thing is very low.
Stop acting as if anime is dead.


The most intelligent comment within the thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HitokiriShadow



Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 6251
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:45 pm Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:
residentgrigo wrote:
And i support Sailor Moon because it has been 15 years and Precure(the first show has alright i guess) had it´s time in the light. Sailor Moon is a international success and i kind of like the manga. The market needs the money and if the final product has the chance to be good it deserves a better adaptaion.


Pretty Cure is not irrelevant simply because you deem it as such. If your concern is money for the market, then Pretty Cure is going to blow Sailor Moon Crystal out of the water in that regard so you should embrace that as well as Toei and Sunrise's other properties for girls. Your statements are contradictory.


Aikatsu is probably a much bigger threat to Precure than a possible Sailor Moon revival.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stealth00



Joined: 18 Feb 2013
Posts: 65
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:48 pm Reply with quote
Zalis116 wrote:
Banjo wrote:
In my opinion, fan service ruined anime in general. Also I believe it will only get worse and worse in the future.
An opinion based on what? Shows like -Monogatari and Infinite Stratos have sold 10-20k+ while artsy-experimental stuff like Fractale completely bombs. If anything, fanservice is keeping the industry alive.


Ruining anime and ruining the industry is not the same thing. And Monogatari is pretty artsy visually.

HitokiriShadow wrote:
But when was the last time you saw any indication that two characters actually had sex together? I have to assume he meant something like that when he referred to Flay.


As far as actual sex scenes, Mirai Nikki? That was 2 years ago? And there was that harem show Yosuga no Sora where the protag bedded every single girl. I'm sure there are a lot more from the last few years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cptn_Taylor



Joined: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 925
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:50 pm Reply with quote
Stuart Smith wrote:

Pretty Cure is not irrelevant simply because you deem it as such. If your concern is money for the market, then Pretty Cure is going to blow Sailor Moon Crystal out of the water in that regard so you should embrace that as well as Toei and Sunrise's other properties for girls. Your statements are contradictory.


Pretty Cure is a money making machine. And has been for god knows how many years. The thing is, PC is not otaku anime. It's mainstream. Mainstream anime like the kind you could enjoy in the 70s, 80s and 90s on tv (no not at 3 am in the morning).


Quote:

All these complaints just make me wonder how much anime people actually watch. Both today and in the past. People act like the 80s and 90s were devoid of sexual content and titillation. Anyone who isn't old enough to know who Lum or Machiko are should not be taking part in this discussion. The only thing that has changed over the years are the fans, more and more I see western fans becoming more close-minded over the years and throwing up buzzwords and sweeping generalizations devoid of any actual argumentative merit. I would love to see someone break down the current 80-odd shows airing on TV right now and explain why they are all bad and anime is dying, but unfortunately that requires effort and critical thinking.

-Stuart Smith


Of course sexiness and titillation was always part of anime. May I encourage you to view some of the "puritan" japanese mainstream anime from the seventies ? It would put to shame a good portion of what passes as "sexy" mainstream anime nowadays. How many people know that Cutie Honey (the original tv series) was cut short in Japan because it was considered to ose' for the little darlings ?

What has changed though over the course of last 4 decades is that anime from a mainstream phenomenon (because it was aired on mainstream tv) was mostly evicted from tv and relegated to late night time slots. And it's this, not regulation as Fukuda is declaring that is the cause of the problem. Once you've cornered yourself into a niche its game over. Late time anime will never ever have the variety in themes that were the staple of mainstream anime. Late night anime are infomercials for selling toys/figs etc... because dvd/blu-rays alone won't be enough.
There is also another problem in that the industry is incapable of producing adult themed animation for the silver screen. Anime has never managed to grow up. And that's why we see the complete rehashing of those standard 3-4 themes in late night anime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ziko577



Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 136
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 5:50 pm Reply with quote
HitokiriShadow wrote:
What's weird about his comment to me is that it's about late-night anime. While sometimes they have to black out or otherwise censor large chunks of the screen, it doesn't seem like there's anything they can't actually do. It would have made more sense if it was aimed at more mainstream time-slots, though even then, Psycho-Pass, which was the most mainstream you can get outside of kids' stuff, basically had on-screen rape along with other pretty gruesome stuff and wasn't censored the way, say, Brynhilder is. Though maybe that was a case of CR or Funi streams being less censored? Guess I'm not 100% on that. I do recall hearing that Code Geass's second season was heavily rewritten because of it's switch to a more mainstream time-slot.

In any case, Pupa seemed to be a specific case of content being so extreme that it significantly affected the production (I don't think super short episodes were what they originally wanted to do, I believe they had trouble getting TV stations to even air it). But otherwise? What exactly are they being prevented from doing?

In any case, if there's an audience anime could reach but currently isn't, I have a hard time seeing this being a major reason for it, or a reason at all.

Hoppy800 wrote:

I just seen a couple commercials on Youtube, wtf, Victory Gundam is far from a kids show. There was also a Super Famicom game geared towards kids too.


Of course it was a kid's show, just like every single Gundam TV series ever, contrary to what some fans seem to think. So was Space Runaway Ideon, have you heard about or seen how THAT turned out? The original Gundam had some fairly graphic scenes as well. Seems like TV stations started cracking down in what kids' shows could get away with in violence sometime in the past 5-10 years though.


Pupa shouldn't have even been animated because most everyone knows how screwed up that show is and what good would it had done to us anyway? Also, there's other shows that may have been ok in the past but now they couldn't air them if they wanted to because of these regulations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
penguintruth



Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8468
Location: Penguinopolis
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:02 pm Reply with quote
RokugoPeachMoon wrote:


Do you honestly believe that the Anime industry cares about a bunch of picky and cynical people thousands of miles away that constantly balk at release prices and rarely buy series-related merchandise in the amount that Japan fans do?.


Yeah, clearly I'm the one in the wrong for not wanting to spend hundreds of dollars on shoddy upskirt dolls of moe trash from shows nobody will remember in a year and Blu-Rays with three episodes on them.

Must be something wrong with me.

No, I don't believe the anime industry cares about me whatsoever, and maybe they shouldn't. But that doesn't disqualify my opinion, now does it? The anime industry doesn't care about anybody here in this forum. Literally nobody here. The "point" you made about what the anime execs care about is entirely irrelevant. We all know what they care about, but that doesn't mean we like it.


Last edited by penguintruth on Wed May 21, 2014 6:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address My Anime My Manga
Stuart Smith



Joined: 13 Jan 2013
Posts: 1298
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:03 pm Reply with quote
HitokiriShadow wrote:
Aikatsu is probably a much bigger threat to Precure than a possible Sailor Moon revival.


There's so much healthy competition between shoujo anime right now that for anyone to hint that it's in some kind of decline or stagnation and Sailor Moon Crystal is going to be some kind of revival is just absurd. You can not revive something already alive and healthy.

Cptn_Taylor wrote:
What has changed though over the course of last 4 decades is that anime from a mainstream phenomenon (because it was aired on mainstream tv) was mostly evicted from tv and relegated to late night time slots. And it's this, not regulation as Fukuda is declaring that is the cause of the problem.


There's more mainstream anime now than there ever was. I suggest you go look at yearly production listings for anime back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. We were lucky to get even 10 shows a season. If you look at just mainstream anime or just late-night anime, either selection will dwarf what was coming out decades ago. The television anime industry has done nothing but grown since then.

Quote:
Once you've cornered yourself into a niche its game over. Late time anime will never ever have the variety in themes that were the staple of mainstream anime.


What themes are these that were lost over the years? Fighting? Mecha? Sci-Fi? Comedy? We get some of each every year.

Quote:
There is also another problem in that the industry is incapable of producing adult themed animation for the silver screen. Anime has never managed to grow up. And that's why we see the complete rehashing of those standard 3-4 themes in late night anime.


Late night anime is aimed near exclusively towards adult viewers. There is a myriad of adult themed anime out there every season. That is simply incorrect.

-Stuart Smith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ziko577



Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 136
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:04 pm Reply with quote
vanfanel wrote:
Too many people are mistaking extreme content for maturity, when all too often it represents the exact opposite. Jojo, for example, is fun, but absolutely nothing about it is mature -- if anything, that show seems remarkably in touch with its inner demented five-year old (that's an observation, btw; not a criticism).

And I don't get what this director is complaining about regarding censorship.

Graphic violence? We got that in Jojo and Hunter x Hunter right now.

Nudity? That's all over late night anime now as well, and those beams of light blocking out the details are not censorship; they're a way to entice the truly sad to shell out 7,000 yen for the "uncensored" blu-ray.

Solid storytelling? Let me direct you to Space Brothers, Cross Game, Hyouka, and Kids on the Slope.

Want to go a little more art-house? Try Hyouge-mono, Flowers of Evil, or the current Ping-Pong.

Otaku shows that are actually good? Madoka Magica and Fate Zero are still in recent memory.

All kinds of stuff is getting made. Most of it is same-old same-old (fetish-of-the-week for the late-night otaku crowd; shonen jump/card fight stuff for kids), but that is compost from which flowers do occasionally bloom. Sturgeon's law applies, but we've still got the 10% that isn't crap; a better signal-to-noise ratio than that is not the norm; it's a golden age. The parade of fanservice and bizarre fetishes in late-night anime is a turn-off for me, and the explosion in the number of card battle shows eating up the kids' timeslots is depressing and worrisome, but to suggest that nothing "mature" can get made anymore is just ridiculous.


There are too many cardfighting shows on and most of them are crashing and burning all to hell now. The kings to me are Yu-Gi-Oh!, Duel Masters, and Battle Spirits as they all have left there marks on the industry and continue to after all these years with various sequels, merchandise, and cards. Then you got shows like, Vanguard, Z/X Ignition, Live-On!, and others and they all are bad in terms of little character development, lackluster visuals, and overall bad presentation. Again, something to sell to kids. Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lynx Amali





PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:15 pm Reply with quote
Ziko577 wrote:

Then you got shows like, Vanguard, Z/X Ignition, Live-On!, and others and they all are bad in terms of little character development, lackluster visuals, and overall bad presentation. Again, something to sell to kids.


Did you really just say Vanguard has little to no character development?
Compare Aichi from the first few episodes to Aichi as of Link Joker. He's had a improvement in terms of his character. Same thing with Kai and Misaki. Vanguard is fantastic in terms of small amounts rather than large chunks of character dev.


And most of the later stuff like visuals and presentation are subjective. Extremely subjective, at that.
Back to top
Hoppy800



Joined: 09 Aug 2013
Posts: 3331
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:20 pm Reply with quote
To be fair Z/X Ignition was poorly executed beyond belief, it was like watching another anime and not a good one at that. Wixoss did things better although there is very little if any explanation of the card game it's selling which turns me off. When you create anime to sell a game, you must explain at the very least the basic rules and mechanics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ziko577



Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 136
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2014 6:22 pm Reply with quote
Lynx Amali wrote:
Ziko577 wrote:

Then you got shows like, Vanguard, Z/X Ignition, Live-On!, and others and they all are bad in terms of little character development, lackluster visuals, and overall bad presentation. Again, something to sell to kids.


Did you really just say Vanguard has little to no character development?
Compare Aichi from the first few episodes to Aichi as of Link Joker. He's had a improvement in terms of his character. Same thing with Kai and Misaki. Vanguard is fantastic in terms of small amounts rather than large chunks of character dev.


And most of the later stuff like visuals and presentation are subjective. Extremely subjective, at that.


Again, my problem is that with shows like that, they try too late to do all that when the shows I mentioned before do it seamlessly and it makes sense. Why should you have to drag out a series now 4 seasons to do this? The Aichi I know now vs. then isn't really much different. He lost a lot and when he won, it was by luck or sometimes sheer wit. Now they put him on a bus and he's just kaput so Kai can be focused on more. That's just stupid on the part of the creators. Yu-Gi-Oh! never did that nor did the other shows.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 5 of 8

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group