View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Peter Ahlstrom
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:10 pm
|
|
|
Pichi Pichi Pitch rules. So there.
[EDIT: Fine, I'll add more, though I didn't expect any response, so I wouldn't call it a troll--if anything, the review was a troll.
I disagree that this series is in any way a parody. It's meant to be taken seriously by fans of magical girl series aimed at Nakayoshi readers--tween and pretween girls. I cannot explain how I happen to be a fan of such series, since I am obviously not in this demographic.
This manga succeeds far greater at what it sets out to do than your average manga. The anime lasted a year and a half, and the manga was on the cover of Nakayoshi month after month. Each series must be considered in the light of its intended market and how well it speaks to that market. Just because the reviewer is not a fan of such series does not mean it should get a D. ]
Last edited by Peter Ahlstrom on Tue May 02, 2006 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kamon
Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 71
Location: Procrastinating
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:58 pm
|
|
|
You sure showed him.
Man, I really, really dig Genshiken. I should buy more of it.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jadress
Joined: 08 Oct 2003
Posts: 807
Location: Seattle. It purdy and nerdy!
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 4:17 pm
|
|
|
Kamon wrote: | Man, I really, really dig Genshiken. I should buy more of it. |
Yes, as do I. I didn't realize a new volume was out again- I can't wait to blow my $10!!
|
Back to top |
|
|
kanami
Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 26
Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 4:25 pm
|
|
|
Quote: | On the story side, the premise of creating a doujinshi for a convention isn't something everyone's going to connect with, unless you're a seasoned fan or aspiring creator. Technical matters like figuring out printing fees are certainly an important part of making a comic—but as subject matter, it doesn't need to be in a comic. |
Well, yeah, but...
Isn't IT the point of Genshiken??? To show the reader the life of a normal japanese otaku. This manga is actually aimed to japanese readers, so I believe they most likely feel connected with it, since it's very very common that university anime clubs in Japan create their own doujinshis-- I would even think it's a good guide for comiket newbies or a normal guy that just wants to know what's the deal with that stuff. I don't think you can judge this part of the manga from our point of view, since doujinshi is more a japanese thing.
Anaway, I agree with most of the review.
(err... sorry for my really strange english... i'm for mexico so... hehehe)
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nagisa
Moderator
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 6128
Location: Atlanta-ish, Jawjuh
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 6:37 pm
|
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom wrote: | Pichi Pichi Pitch rules. So there. |
If that's all you have to say, then by all means just don't say anything. One-line trolling simply isn't allowed around here.
|
Back to top |
|
|
.Sy
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 1266
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 7:04 pm
|
|
|
The titles of manga just get stranger and stranger and stranger...Moon Boy?! Mmmm that's a new one.
I've actually wanted to start Genshiken for some time now, but I've made myself wait until the manga draws to a close. Obviously if it goes on any longer I'l have to screw that approach, but with a bi-annual release, I want to make sure nothing's going to happen. If it were serialized in Weekly Jump, there'd be no danger of anything happening to the magazine.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zac
ANN Executive Editor
Joined: 05 Jan 2002
Posts: 7912
Location: Anime News Network Technodrome
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:18 pm
|
|
|
.Sy wrote: | The titles of manga just get stranger and stranger and stranger...Moon Boy?! Mmmm that's a new one.
I've actually wanted to start Genshiken for some time now, but I've made myself wait until the manga draws to a close. Obviously if it goes on any longer I'l have to screw that approach, but with a bi-annual release, I want to make sure nothing's going to happen. If it were serialized in Weekly Jump, there'd be no danger of anything happening to the magazine. |
I think you're being a little too cautious. The series is probably going to run a while longer, and Del Rey is doing quite well. People get skittish because of ADV Manga, but their approach to it was... questionable, to say the least.
You're not risking anything by picking Genshiken up now.
|
Back to top |
|
|
GoodLuckSaturday
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 567
Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:00 pm
|
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom wrote: | Just because the reviewer is not a fan of such series does not mean it should get a D. |
Even as a fan of the series, I think the review was dead on (although I have to disgaree with the last line). I mean, I love it, for reasons I can't comprehend, but it's clear D material (I may have given it a C-, D+ on personal taste tipping). It does have something to it that pulls people in, whether they be little girls or clearly out of demographic people like myself, and apparently you, so it's not a clear waste. It's a series I'd recommend as an equivilent to ice cream brainfreeze, not a general recommendation.
--
Regarding the import of the month, I really would like to read more Ai Yazawa series. I can only hope someone is willing to bring this, and her other stories, to English someday.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:00 pm
|
|
|
Is there any kind of clear definition anywhere which clearly delineates what A, B, C, D, and F are supposed to mean in a manga review?
D means, to me, something next to failure. Pichi Pichi Pitch is extremely successful at doing what it intends to do. Thus it's far away from failure.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kagemusha
Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 2783
Location: Boston
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:42 pm
|
|
|
Quote: | This manga succeeds far greater at what it sets out to do than your average manga. The anime lasted a year and a half, and the manga was on the cover of Nakayoshi month after month. Each series must be considered in the light of its intended market and how well it speaks to that market. Just because the reviewer is not a fan of such series does not mean it should get a D. |
So your saying that if a series is popular it automatically negates any negative opinions expressed? Seriously, your not doing much to help your case. The reviewer gave good reasons why this series deserves a D; you've said it rules because it's popular in Japan. Which opinion are people going to beleive?
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15453
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:19 am
|
|
|
Quote: | "Lucia is the new girl at school. She and her sister run a public bath that's all the rage. When Lucia meets a terrific-looking surfer boy, there's just one little problem: Lucia is a mermaid—not just any mermaid, but a princess on an important mission to save the seven seas from an evil force bent on taking control of the marine world. Such a responsibility doesn't leave much time for romance. But Lucia vows to protect her world and win the heart of handsome Kaito." |
Wasn't that the plot for Aquamarine?
Quote: | Oh, and the content's not too bad, either—Keiichi's chronic ineptness continues to amuse, especially once Urd arrives and tries to stir up the boy's libido. (Hint: there isn't any.) |
He's just repressed.
Quote: | Colored pages may be a bonus, but they also highlight how rough the character designs were at the time, with stubby bodies and oddly shaped hair. |
Newsflash. That's how people looked in the 80's. =p
Quote: | The biggest problem, though, is the utter lack of story—it's more like a series of sitcom gags strung together |
That's actually how I feel about the first book in the Maison Ikkoku re-release edition.
Quote: | And sometimes... sometimes, you just want to slap Keiichi for getting nowhere with Belldandy. |
Just read the doujinshi on the net if you're lookin' for that.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:06 pm
|
|
|
Kagemusha wrote: |
Quote: | This manga succeeds far greater at what it sets out to do than your average manga. The anime lasted a year and a half, and the manga was on the cover of Nakayoshi month after month. Each series must be considered in the light of its intended market and how well it speaks to that market. Just because the reviewer is not a fan of such series does not mean it should get a D. |
So your saying that if a series is popular it automatically negates any negative opinions expressed? Seriously, your not doing much to help your case. The reviewer gave good reasons why this series deserves a D; you've said it rules because it's popular in Japan. Which opinion are people going to beleive? |
Well, I would tend to think the opinion of tons of Japanese people in its target demographic would trump the opinion of a single American reviewer out of that demographic, yes.
As for the reasons given:
Quote: | Sadly, this story reduces the magical girl genre to a level of self-pastiche, where cramming together familiar clichés works as a substitute for story. |
I already said it's not a parody in any way. And he doesn't give any evidence for this or the second claim, unless you count the following...
Quote: | Lucia's mermaid power is, of course, contained within a precious object (in this case a pearl), and she fights evil with a magical microphone that amplifies her enchanted singing voice. Ridiculous enough yet? |
No, not really. It makes perfect sense for a magical girl mermaid's power to be associate with singing, and pearls as the object connected with that power are as good as any other undersea object. As for the microphone issue, any attack on this concept could be more believably directed at the obvious accessory-marketing motivation behind it--a magical microphone is in itself not ridiculous.
Quote: | Don't forget about the bishounen bad guy who goes by the parody-name of Gackto (and looks like the musician,) |
There's no evidence that that's any kind of parody. Looks more like a homage to me.
Quote: | plus the usual one-villain-per-chapter structure. |
So what? This is, as he says, usual. It's what people are used to. But anyway, the manga does not follow a strict one-villain-per-chapter structure--sometimes the villains last more than one chapter. Actually, they tend to come back and try again later. The manga, being much shorter, does a better job of avoiding the cliche than the anime, which adds a whole lot of villain-of-the-week filler.
Quote: | It's too weak to take seriously |
It's about singing mermaids. How "serious" do you expect it to be?
Quote: | and too straight-up to take as a joke. |
But just because it's not completely focused on weighty moral issues doesn't mean it's meant as a joke either. It's just supposed to be entertaining to its target audience. But anyway, the series does have less light issues such as the piano teacher's connection with the orange mermaid, Kaito's connection with Gackto, etc. And there's romance involved as well--but this review didn't even mention Lucia's love interest beyond the back cover copy.
Quote: | Heck, just don't bother taking it at all. |
Fine advice to someone who seems to like as few manga as this reviewer based on past reviews, but there is no discussion of or sign of any comprehension of what market this series is intended to reach.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
![](/bbs/phpBB2/images/subscriber-red.png) I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10448
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:29 pm
|
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom wrote: |
Well, I would tend to think the opinion of tons of Japanese people in its target demographic would trump the opinion of a single American reviewer out of that demographic, yes. |
I'm just going to comment on this one item.
The opinions of American readers / reviewers are much more important than those of "Japanese people in its target demographic."
Why? Because when the manga was translated into English and published by an American company, its target demographic changed. It is now being marketed to North American manga fans. Our readers are mostly North Americans. Our reviewer is North American (albeit of foreign decent, but then most North Americans are). Our reviewer is a fairly typical North American manga fan. As such, he is more like the manga's new target demographic than the people who make up its Japanese target demographic.
We review manga for North American readers. While a North American fan can be expected to have certain Japan-o-centric leanings, his (or her) tastes, by and large, are more North American than Japanese. The result, is that something can be a hit with Japanese readers, and in the eyes of American readers, totally suck. And vice versa.
Over the past 14 years, we've already seen a slew of shows that were mega-hits in Japan and did poorly here, and others that were milding in Japan and became mega-hits in North America.
Still, opinions within a demographic are going to differ, just because one "average" North American manga fan likes or dislikes something, it doesn't mean that someone else will.
Take any manga that "everyone" hates, and it has a few readers who think its great.
Quote: | Is there any kind of clear definition anywhere which clearly delineates what A, B, C, D, and F are supposed to mean in a manga review? |
A = Excellent
B = Better than average / Very good
C = Average / Good
D = Under average / not so good
F = Fail / Bad
I expect the average of all the reviews by any reviewer to fall somewhere in the "C" range. If they fall higher it means the reviewer is either too lenient or happens to be getting all the good material.
-t
|
Back to top |
|
|
astra
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 131
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 2:03 pm
|
|
|
Wait, whaaaat? Kagen no Tsuki is by Ai Yazawa? Yeah, I suck at reading kanji. But the art is so different from her other manga. I would never have guessed it. Yeah, I bought a bunch of this series at Bookoff for a dollar when I was still getting the hang of Japanese and I guess I just didn't read them well enough. I also wasn't a fan of Yazawa back then. I need to check them out again
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nobuyuki
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 536
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:23 pm
|
|
|
Peter Ahlstrom wrote: |
As for the reasons given:
Quote: | Sadly, this story reduces the magical girl genre to a level of self-pastiche, where cramming together familiar cliches works as a substitute for story. |
I already said it's not a parody in any way. And he doesn't give any evidence for this or the second claim, unless you count the following... |
"Pastiche" does not equal "parody".
pastiche - a work of art that imitates the style of some previous work
parody - 1a. A literary or artistic work that imitates the characteristic style of an author or a work for comic effect or ridicule
|
Back to top |
|
|
|