| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
|
|
yamiangie
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 465
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 12:00 am
|
 |
|
|
Ok maybe I should leave Fios if they willingly hand over peoples identities so easily. And it looks like that company aren't playing fair in these lawsuites seeing as the crap that comes up when you google them.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Covnam
Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 3824
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 12:12 am
|
|
|
|
If Verizon has already handed over the names, but the judge ordered the identities sealed, does that mean that no future action can be taken against them and whoever verizon gave the information to has to destroy it? Or is it still admissible in court?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
dengart
Joined: 10 Oct 2010
Posts: 16
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:07 am
|
|
|
| Covnam wrote: | | If Verizon has already handed over the names, but the judge ordered the identities sealed, does that mean that no future action can be taken against them and whoever verizon gave the information to has to destroy it? Or is it still admissible in court? |
If the plaintiff and the plaintiff's attorney have destroyed the list of names and the subpoena response they received, what evidence would they have to show who the John Does are?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polycell
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 4623
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 1:44 am
|
|
|
| yamiangie wrote: | | Ok maybe I should leave Fios if they willingly hand over peoples identities so easily. |
It's worse than that; they'd basically been ordered not to turn over the identities. So not only did they not respect their users' privacy, they broke the law to do it!
Last edited by Polycell on Wed May 23, 2012 8:50 am; edited 1 time in total
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Xanas
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 2058
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 6:59 am
|
|
|
|
I think Verizon probably made an error here in an attempt to comply with the subpoena before the stay. They are likely not doing a good job of keeping up with these kinds of things. The costs of complying with idiotic laws is high.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Yttrbio
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 3670
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 7:53 am
|
|
|
|
In general, does an ISP have a privacy obligation? I mean, if there was no court case, could they just tell a third party who some of their users were?
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Gilles Poitras
Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Posts: 480
Location: Oakland California
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 8:27 am
|
|
|
| Yttrbio wrote: | | In general, does an ISP have a privacy obligation? I mean, if there was no court case, could they just tell a third party who some of their users were? |
In the US that would depend on state privacy laws.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Gilles Poitras
Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Posts: 480
Location: Oakland California
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 8:29 am
|
|
|
| Covnam wrote: | | If Verizon has already handed over the names, but the judge ordered the identities sealed, does that mean that no future action can be taken against them and whoever verizon gave the information to has to destroy it? Or is it still admissible in court? |
Probably still admissible depending on how the case goes.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
TsukasaElkKite
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 4021
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
THIS is why I stopped torrenting.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
yamiangie
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 465
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:08 pm
|
|
|
| TsukasaElkKite wrote: | | THIS is why I stopped torrenting. |
Well I don't torrent my stupid brother does. Most anime isn't worth my internet as a whole.
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
