View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15571
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:33 am
|
|
|
You might want to edit the celebrities Machiyama trashed, so you don't get sued for libel. Especially since Jacko hasn't been convicted yet.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10460
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:41 am
|
|
|
Oops, this article wasn't supposed to be posted till midnight, how'd that happen ?
Quote: | You might want to edit the celebrities Machiyama trashed, so you don't get sued for libel. Especially since Jacko hasn't been convicted yet. |
It's a quote, he'd get sued for libel, not us. And I doubt it'll happen.
[edit: What's more, he doesn't actually say anything about Jackson. His comment about Carey perhaps borders on libel, although he's obviously giving a comment about Carey's writing that equates to "Carey's writing is not respectful of Japan, some I don't think he's respectiful of Japan. He's an idiot that way." But in fewer words. I have no idea what side of the law that would fall on.]
[Edit 2: "What's more, he doesn't actually say anything about Jackson." (Because it's the reader who assumes that to "become Michael Jackson" is a bad thing.)]
-t
Last edited by Tempest on Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:55 am; edited 2 times in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15571
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:43 am
|
|
|
Then put some sort of disclaimer saying that the following comments are not endorsed by ANN.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10460
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:51 am
|
|
|
GATSU wrote: | Then put some sort of disclaimer saying that the following comments are not endorsed by ANN. |
Those disclaimers are for columns and editorials. Its a given that the opinions expressed by an interviewee do not necesarrily reflect the interviewer or the publication that publishes the interview.
What's more, those disclaimers aren't legally binding. The publication is still responsible for articles published in that manner.
I'm not sure where the technical line gets drawn between editorial comments, and comments made in an interview (by the interviewee), but obviously that line exists somewhere...
Just for good measure, I'm going to double check this one with my lawyer, but in the meantime I'm not actually concerned. Anyone who mistakes Machiyama's opinions for ANN's is an idiot.
-t
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10460
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:53 am
|
|
|
For the record, I haven't read "Wrong about Japan" and have no opinion on it or its author.
-t
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrgazpacho
Joined: 14 Jan 2002
Posts: 316
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:14 am
|
|
|
tempest wrote: | For the record, I haven't read "Wrong about Japan" and have no opinion on it or its author. |
I don't think that disclaimer was necessary
|
Back to top |
|
|
|