×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more
You are welcome to look at the talkback but please consider that this article is over 16 years old before posting.

Forum - View topic
REVIEW: Tactics GN 3




Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kimyo



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 101
Location: In my own world.
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:11 pm Reply with quote
I adore this series! It's cute and fun and Kantarou is my fave! I've got vols 1-2 of the ADV version, and vols 1-6 of the Tokyopop version so far!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
belvadeer





PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:29 am Reply with quote
Well this does differ from the TV series in one way and I am tempted to get Vol. 1 for one reason.
Back to top
liannesentar



Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 30
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:24 am Reply with quote
Even a decent adaptation...

Woo! *dances* Thank you much, Casey.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
OnanRulz



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 132
Location: The MPLS
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:22 pm Reply with quote
Quote:
In the first story, for example, we learn that the “curse” is actually the fault of a girl who is trying to save her twin sister's life by killing all the men in any way involved with said sister.


SPOLIER ALERT: spoiler[Isn't this the plot of Mike Myers' So I Married an Axe Murderer?]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
branewurms



Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 19
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:02 am Reply with quote
This review is terrible. Firstly, the reviewer has nothing but bad things to say about the story, and then rates the story with a "B"? Wha -? Perhaps the reviewer is unaware that a "B" generally indicates moderately good work?

Secondly, the reviewer is judging this series against particular genre standards that Tactics never set out to fulfill. If you are looking for adventure, why would you be reading a comedic supernatural mystery series? Tactics has action, of course, but action is not nor was ever intended to be the core of the series. If you're looking for action and adventure, go read an action/adventure series. There are plenty out there, to be sure. The rest of us enjoy a change from non-stop fights and level-ups now and then. It would seem that the reviewer has a preconception that supernatural anime/manga are supposed to be mainly action oriented. The reviewer has apparently never been exposed to the likes of Mushishi, Natsume Yuujinchou, and other quiet, whimsical works with a folklore-ish flare, which have even less action than Tactics.

Thirdly, the reviewer has a problem with the fact that the robot-dog-from-the-future segment is, how should we say, coked-out insanity. That segment is an omake. Omakes are generally supposed to be, you know, funny? It was never intended to be taken seriously. (I suppose this reviewer, upon seeing the "Granny-a-Go-Go" omake from Blue Seed, would think that they creators intended the audience to think that the protagonist's grandmother really goes out to night-clubs in tiny skirts and flings her mile-long breasts around on the dance floor.)

Lastly, I'd like to point out that the reviewer should probably check his or her facts before stating that hints of an ongoing plot are most likely meaningless. As a matter of fact, volume four is where said ongoing plot really gets going. Whether that plot is well written or not is another matter altogether, but it is there, no doubt.

In sum, shoddy review is shoddy, so forth, et cetera. It's pretty bad form to give a bad review because a title doesn't succeed at something it was never trying to succeed at.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raven_mirta



Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 1
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 1:05 pm Reply with quote
I agree with the post above me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
championferret



Joined: 15 Jan 2004
Posts: 765
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:40 pm Reply with quote
Casey can write as shoddily as she wants, if only she'd stop putting freaking spoilers in everything.
I only read this review because I'm already up to volume 6 of this series, but I'm now 100% certain I cant read a Casey review for anything I haven't read, or it'll just be spoiled for me. It's kinda annoying, to put it very lightly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kimyo



Joined: 31 May 2005
Posts: 101
Location: In my own world.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:08 am Reply with quote
branewurms wrote:
This review is terrible. Firstly, the reviewer has nothing but bad things to say about the story, and then rates the story with a "B"? Wha -? Perhaps the reviewer is unaware that a "B" generally indicates moderately good work?

Secondly, the reviewer is judging this series against particular genre standards that Tactics never set out to fulfill. If you are looking for adventure, why would you be reading a comedic supernatural mystery series? Tactics has action, of course, but action is not nor was ever intended to be the core of the series. If you're looking for action and adventure, go read an action/adventure series. There are plenty out there, to be sure. The rest of us enjoy a change from non-stop fights and level-ups now and then. It would seem that the reviewer has a preconception that supernatural anime/manga are supposed to be mainly action oriented. The reviewer has apparently never been exposed to the likes of Mushishi, Natsume Yuujinchou, and other quiet, whimsical works with a folklore-ish flare, which have even less action than Tactics.

Thirdly, the reviewer has a problem with the fact that the robot-dog-from-the-future segment is, how should we say, coked-out insanity. That segment is an omake. Omakes are generally supposed to be, you know, funny? It was never intended to be taken seriously. (I suppose this reviewer, upon seeing the "Granny-a-Go-Go" omake from Blue Seed, would think that they creators intended the audience to think that the protagonist's grandmother really goes out to night-clubs in tiny skirts and flings her mile-long breasts around on the dance floor.)

Lastly, I'd like to point out that the reviewer should probably check his or her facts before stating that hints of an ongoing plot are most likely meaningless. As a matter of fact, volume four is where said ongoing plot really gets going. Whether that plot is well written or not is another matter altogether, but it is there, no doubt.

In sum, shoddy review is shoddy, so forth, et cetera. It's pretty bad form to give a bad review because a title doesn't succeed at something it was never trying to succeed at.


Hear, Hear!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CCSYueh



Joined: 03 Jul 2004
Posts: 2707
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:47 am Reply with quote
OnanRulz wrote:
Quote:
In the first story, for example, we learn that the “curse” is actually the fault of a girl who is trying to save her twin sister's life by killing all the men in any way involved with said sister.


SPOLIER ALERT: spoiler[Isn't this the plot of Mike Myers' So I Married an Axe Murderer?]


I seem to recall Mrs Bates did something similar far earlier than the characters in Myers movie.

Tactics is a lot better than any number of mindlessly similar shojo titles full of annoying female leads too fricken dense to figure out the hot guy wants her/she loves him/or whatever else drags on for too many volumes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message My Anime My Manga
fuuma_monou



Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 1852
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:30 am Reply with quote
CCSYueh wrote:
Tactics is a lot better than any number of mindlessly similar shojo titles full of annoying female leads too fricken dense to figure out the hot guy wants her/she loves him/or whatever else drags on for too many volumes.


According to Matt Thorn, the problem is that shoujo manga editors are (almost) all men. It's kind of embarrassing that the ten-year-old heroines in Sugar Sugar Rune are more nuanced than the average teenage girl lead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group