View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Josh7289
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 1252
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:07 am
|
|
|
Awesome.
|
Back to top |
|
|
foxia
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:19 am
|
|
|
Oh my god.... Another lifesize Gundam.... This just gets better and better.
|
Back to top |
|
|
penguintruth
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8503
Location: Penguinopolis
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:27 am
|
|
|
I hope police are on hand to prevent Gundamjacks.
|
Back to top |
|
|
walw6pK4Alo
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:44 am
|
|
|
So I'm guessing it's the RX-78-2 like always. I guess it's 1:1 at 18 m, though MAHQ lists it at 18.5 m. Close enough. I just wish they'd do something other the iconic piece of crap that lost it's head at A-Baoa-Qu. I guess Zeta or Nu would be a lot harder, Nu being 23 m. They're both much better looking (and better overall) Gundams. Oh well. I hope this thing is permanent.
penguintruth wrote: | I hope police are on hand to prevent Gundamjacks. |
Especially from angsty teens with no piloting experience, eh? All we need now is a war with the Principality of North Korea.
Last edited by walw6pK4Alo on Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:48 am; edited 2 times in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
TokyoGetter
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 416
Location: CA. You can tell by the low moral standards.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:46 am
|
|
|
walw6pK4Alo wrote: | So I'm guessing it's the RX-78-2 like always. I guess it's 1:1 at 18 m, though MAHQ lists it at 18.5 m. Close enough. I just wish they'd do something other the iconic piece of crap that lost it's head at A-Baoa-Qu. I guess Zeta or Nu would be a lot harder, Nu being 23 m. They're both much better looking (and better overall) Gundams. Oh well. I hope this thing is permanent. |
Somebody built a big Zeta in 2004/2005 somewhere... I saw it on TV but didn't retain the info.
|
Back to top |
|
|
samuelp
Industry Insider
Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 2249
Location: San Antonio, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:48 am
|
|
|
So is this like, RL(real life)-grade?
AW-grade? (actually works)
TETAO-grade (too expensive to actually own)
You know what would be totally awesome: If Tokyo gets the summer olympics in 2016, most of the new venues will be on Odaiba (There's a space near Big Site that is specifically where they are planning a giant new stadium, I'm pretty sure), so on long shots of the regatta we might see a giant gundam looming in the background
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtm42
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:49 am
|
|
|
Why is the RX-78-2 holding a naked toddler? Really, I mean, why?
|
Back to top |
|
|
walw6pK4Alo
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 9322
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:50 am
|
|
|
dtm42 wrote: | Why is the RX-78-2 holding a naked toddler? Really, I mean, why? |
It wants to be Ideon.
|
Back to top |
|
|
penguintruth
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 8503
Location: Penguinopolis
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:52 am
|
|
|
dtm42 wrote: | Why is the RX-78-2 holding a naked toddler? Really, I mean, why? |
Why not?
|
Back to top |
|
|
ninjaclown
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 199
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:52 am
|
|
|
walw6pK4Alo wrote: | So I'm guessing it's the RX-78-2 like always. I guess it's 1:1 at 18 m, though MAHQ lists it at 18.5 m. Close enough. I just wish they'd do something other the iconic piece of crap that lost it's head at A-Baoa-Qu. I guess Zeta or Nu would be a lot harder, Nu being 23 m. They're both much better looking (and better overall) Gundams. Oh well. I hope this thing is permanent. |
Maybe because it is the first Gundam ever to exist. Show some respect for the grandfather of all Gundams, would ya?
|
Back to top |
|
|
lheiskell
Industry Insider
Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 234
Location: Fort Worth, TX
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:52 am
|
|
|
Gun...damn
|
Back to top |
|
|
dtm42
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 14084
Location: currently stalking my waifu
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:05 am
|
|
|
penguintruth wrote: |
dtm42 wrote: | Why is the RX-78-2 holding a naked toddler? Really, I mean, why? |
Why not? |
Number one: it is a naked toddler. I don't know about you, but I don't remember many naked toddlers appearing in the Gundam franchise. Though there certainly hasn't been a dearth of naked angsty teenagers......
Number two: the baby hasn't got a helmet, or a spacesuit for that matter.
Number three: the toddler is naked. Is that the sort of picture that comes to mind when people think of the Gundam franchise? I am starting to question if I should really be a part of this utterly weird section of fandom.
Number four: the franchise is now thirty years old. Surely that young toddler should now be a disaffected member of Generation X.
|
Back to top |
|
|
chinabean
Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:09 am
|
|
|
sweet
|
Back to top |
|
|
PlatinumHawke
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 204
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:12 am
|
|
|
ninjaclown wrote: | Maybe because it is the first Gundam ever to exist. Show some respect for the grandfather of all Gundams, would ya? |
I like the RX-78 as much as the next /m/an, but I'd respect it a whole lot more if Bandai wasn't all "NEW RX-78 REPAINT, BUY BUY BUY" with it's model sales. Sure it's iconic... it's also beaten to death.
|
Back to top |
|
|
sunflowerseed
Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 106
Location: South Texas
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:15 am
|
|
|
Now that is totally awesome! There was a shopping mall had one that was pretty big up displayed a banner for the Olympics I believe recently. I think the Japanese should leave this one up or move it to a National Park along with making statues of other giants from Japan since they are 'history' of Japan.
(sic) The second reason is so those he survive the post-apocalypse of 2012 who are all learning a new language and way of life can have something to worship.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|