View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
lossthief
ANN Reviewer
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 1440
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 12:48 pm
|
|
|
Count me among those confused at people thinking this reveal somehow turns Luffy into a Chosen One. Yes, the Gum-Gum fruit has greater historical significance than we first believed, but it's important to remember that Luffy ate the fruit entirely by accident. He wasn't born with nor destined for nor chosen by another character to inherit it - he quite literally pilfered it out of Shanks' boat without knowing what it was.
If there's any predestination here, it's the sense that the Fruit will always find its way to a suitably anti-authoritarian wielder, but everything Luffy has achieved in the series has been through his own development, training, etc - as much as any Devil Fruit user's.
|
Back to top |
|
|
everydaygamer
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:16 pm
|
|
|
lossthief wrote: | Count me among those confused at people thinking this reveal somehow turns Luffy into a Chosen One. Yes, the Gum-Gum fruit has greater historical significance than we first believed, but it's important to remember that Luffy ate the fruit entirely by accident. He wasn't born with nor destined for nor chosen by another character to inherit it - he quite literally pilfered it out of Shanks' boat without knowing what it was.
If there's any predestination here, it's the sense that the Fruit will always find its way to a suitably anti-authoritarian wielder, but everything Luffy has achieved in the series has been through his own development, training, etc - as much as any Devil Fruit user's. |
Too be honest my only issue with Gear 5 is that the other gears were the result of Luffy using his abilities in rediculous but clever ways. Gear 5 is just a massive deus ex machina whose only only explanation is that his devil fruit was actually some super amazing ability no one knew about.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Everlasting Coconut
Joined: 22 Jul 2019
Posts: 316
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:36 pm
|
|
|
OH&S wrote: | If Luffy is a Chosen One figure, who exactly chose him? |
Funnily enough, it's not uncommon for this to not be made clear in Chosen One storylines. Sometimes things are left vague and the reader is simply left to believe that some unknown higher power or the universe itself was the one who chose the main character to save the world or do whatever it is that he's destined to do.
In One Piece's case, you could either argue the same thing, or you could argue that Nika/Joyboy was the the one who chose Luffy. The latter one seems to be more plausible. To quote the Five Elders: "Zoan Fruits contain a mind of their own. And this particular fruit has the name of a god."
Quote: | Granted, but neither the Sea Kings nor Zunesha recognised him as their long awaited sovereign when he could hear them. |
Sure, but his fruit and Nika powers had not awakened yet at that point.
I hope you're right though. I'd love for Luffy not to be the prophesied sovereign. Or for Luffy to be the prophesied sovereign only for him to reject that role they want to impose of him. I'm fine with anything that subverses the destiny stuff.
Quote: | That said, it was obvious Luffy was Joyboy all the way back at Fishman Island. |
This I mostly agree with. The seeds indicating Luffy might be Joyboy seemed to have been planted first at Fishman Island. Still:
Quote: | It didn't come out of nowhere. There's more than enough information to conclude that Oda had some version of this idea back in Skypiea (no, not the silhouette; that's backshadowing). Even if Sun God Nika was only mentioned very recently, there has been foreshadowing for this. The catch is that all the foreshadowing is passive and indirect: meaning no one (including Oda within the manga) went out of their way to specifically point out the key points that justify it. The Sun is the single most important motif in the entire series. Ancient Jaya/Skypiea explicitly worshipped a Sun god and the Sun is revered (for different reasons) in Fishman Island and Elbaf. All of the theming in the series about dawn, the Sun and freedom have been building up to this. |
See, there is this ongoing discussion of when exactly Oda conceived the idea of Joyboy/Nika or where in the manga did he first leave a sign pointing to it. And I kid you not, I have seen people claiming that it was planned as early as chapter 1.
Most people argue that it was as early as Skypiea, but that to me sounds far-fetched as well. Does the Sun God in Skypiea sound anything like Sun God Nika? First of all, the Skypieans worshipped four gods: sun, rain, forest, and earth. All heavily nature themed, and 3 of which have never been mentioned again. Second, they were framed as the kind of gods who demand blood and little girls to be sacrificed in their name so as not to incur their wrath. Does that sound anything like Nika, the guy who selflessly freed slaves and brought smiles to people's faces? Or does it sound like self-contained, Skypiean cultural lore? Not to mention that even though Nika is a sun god, he's not really thematically tied to the concept of nature, but rather the concept of joy, laughter, and everything Grant talked about in his episode 1071 review. I also foresee light vs darkness paralells with Blackbeard in the future, but again, that is not really nature-themed, but rather good vs evil.
Now, there is such a thing as coming up with a new idea midway through your story and wanting to introduce it as naturally as possible instead of shoehorning it in. This happens all the time in long-running stories, especially stories like One Piece that span over decades. Authors don't have everything figured out from the beginning, and it is well known that Oda in particular had no idea the story would take this long. Authors also change and grow throughout the years, and their stories evolve with them. So it's not surprising for an author to come up with an idea he hadn't thought of before 500 chapters in and to want to introduce it without making it feel disruptive. You mentioned the term "backshadowing," which implies something had already been planned and it is now being brought to light, but for this case I prefer the term "retroactive foreshadowing" (which I've seen used in Gear 5 discussions), i.e., assigning new meaning to previously introduced elements.
So yeah, if at any point the story wants to justify Nika's existence by saying that the sun montif had been there since the beginning and because the Skypieans prayed that Luffy would help them, it can totally do that. But it doesn't mean the concept of Nika was actually foreshadowed there nor does it make Nika's introduction less awkward, just like how it's obvious that Ace's tattoo was originally just a gag and not an allussion to Sabo*. It just means Oda went back and assigned new meaning to the sun motif.
But in the end, this is ultimately speculation on our part. Only Oda knows when he came up with the concept of Nika. Also, there's nothing wrong with retroactive foreshadowing per se. It can be great literary device and One Piece has benefitted from it on many ocassions. I just don't think that is the case here.
*Don't y'all get me started on Ace's tattoo cause Lord knows I will fight you
Quote: | The fruit didn't change though. The thematic meaning behind the fruit has been updated but the actual fruit is the exact same as the beginning of the series |
That's the thing though. It's the change in thematic meaning that undermines Luffy's accomplishments and who Luffy is as a character (unless the story subverses the destiny stuff later on, which I'm hopeful it will). The Celestial Dragons are self-proclaimed gods, and Luffy is the enemy of the gods because he's a man of humble beginnings who stands up against the opression of said gods. So why make Luffy a god-coded character out of all people?
Quote: | Luffy still had to work hard and train for 10 years to use his initially crappy ability and take on increasingly tougher challenges throughout the entire series before awakening. |
lossthief wrote: | everything Luffy has achieved in the series has been through his own development, training, etc - as much as any Devil Fruit user's. |
Then why not just leave it at that instead of adding the god layer it? Because this:
"Luffy represents hard-work."
Will always be inherently better than this:
"Luffy represents hard-work. He was also chosen by god and is now god/reincarnation of god"
Last edited by Everlasting Coconut on Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
Back to top |
|
|
everydaygamer
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:00 pm
|
|
|
People try to give Oda too much credit. It's been clear as early on as Vivi that he makes things up as he goes along. That's not a criticism as he's very good at it.
But come on there was no hint that this was coming, it came so completely out of no where that Oda had to have the 5 government guys explain what was happening to an invisible audience because he hadn't laid enough ground work for the exposition to happen more naturally.
|
Back to top |
|
|
garfield15
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1533
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:25 pm
|
|
|
everydaygamer wrote: | People try to give Oda too much credit. It's been clear as early on as Vivi that he makes things up as he goes along. That's not a criticism as he's very good at it.
But come on there was no hint that this was coming, it came so completely out of no where that Oda had to have the 5 government guys explain what was happening to an invisible audience because he hadn't laid enough ground work for the exposition to happen more naturally. |
When the manga chapter was coming out, the thing that really made me do a double take was the implication that they'd been looking for the Gum-Gum Fruit for centuries. That's like a big "HUH?" moment
|
Back to top |
|
|
everydaygamer
|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:51 pm
|
|
|
garfield15 wrote: |
everydaygamer wrote: | People try to give Oda too much credit. It's been clear as early on as Vivi that he makes things up as he goes along. That's not a criticism as he's very good at it.
But come on there was no hint that this was coming, it came so completely out of no where that Oda had to have the 5 government guys explain what was happening to an invisible audience because he hadn't laid enough ground work for the exposition to happen more naturally. |
When the manga chapter was coming out, the thing that really made me do a double take was the implication that they'd been looking for the Gum-Gum Fruit for centuries. That's like a big "HUH?" moment |
Haha yeah that's just silly, it's not like Luffy was hiding. If the fruit was so dangerous you'd think they'd put more effort into hunting Luffy down.
|
Back to top |
|
|
OH&S
Joined: 15 Jul 2013
Posts: 307
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2023 2:16 am
|
|
|
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | Funnily enough, it's not uncommon for this to not be made clear in Chosen One storylines. Sometimes things are left vague and the reader is simply left to believe that some unknown higher power or the universe itself was the one who chose the main character to save the world or do whatever it is that he's destined to do. |
Seems like a bit of a copout explanation tbh.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | In One Piece's case, you could either argue the same thing, or you could argue that Nika/Joyboy was the the one who chose Luffy. The latter one seems to be more plausible. To quote the Five Elders: "Zoan Fruits contain a mind of their own. And this particular fruit has the name of a god." |
We can surmise that Joyboy was most likely the previous user of the Awakened Nika fruit in the Void Century. What I'm not convinced of at this stage is if the Sun God is a real entity in the One Piece world or just the dream of those wished for a savior. But this is starting to get into spoiler territory regarding the explanation of Devil Fruits. If he isn't real, then no one chose Luffy unless the original Joyboy was the literal Sun God before the fruit even existed. If its just the fruit that chose him, that's a weak implementation of the Chosen One trope.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | Sure, but his fruit and Nika powers had not awakened yet at that point. |
That I accept but it supports the idea that the fruit isn't really special until it awakens.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | I hope you're right though. I'd love for Luffy not to be the prophesied sovereign. Or for Luffy to be the prophesied sovereign only for him to reject that role they want to impose of him. I'm fine with anything that subverses the destiny stuff. |
I've heard this sentiment before as well. But is it really that big of a deal that some intangible concept of destiny has preordained that someone like Luffy would eventually come? IMHO, as long as everything is a result of the free and unrestricted choices of Luffy just happening to match the outcome in prophecy it shouldn't be a problem. Destiny and free will don't have to be diametrically opposed concepts. However, I do agree it would be a problem if Luffy didn't actually have a choice in any of this or is a reincarnation; but that development would be the equivalent of Oda torching the central theme of his series into a pile of ashes. So far, Luffy has beaten the reincarnation allegations.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | See, there is this ongoing discussion of when exactly Oda conceived the idea of Joyboy/Nika or where in the manga did he first leave a sign pointing to it. And I kid you not, I have seen people claiming that it was planned as early as chapter 1. |
Its not outside of the realm of possibility that Oda had the idea of turning his MC into literal toon character from the very beginning. But the people saying that there's any proof of this as early as Chapter 1 of the manga are smoking some really good crack.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | Most people argue that it was as early as Skypiea, but that to me sounds far-fetched as well.
<big_snip>
But in the end, this is ultimately speculation on our part. Only Oda knows when he came up with the concept of Nika. Also, there's nothing wrong with retroactive foreshadowing per se. It can be great literary device and One Piece has benefitted from it on many ocassions. I just don't think that is the case here. |
This is probably the most important point and I want to go into a bit more detail here. The first 300 chapters were a very formative period for the series in the sense that elements that were introduced then have ended up dictating a large portion of the plot that occurred afterwards. The warlords; the Will of D; the void century; the ancient weapons; the first mention and implementation of haki; Sanji's hidden backstory; all the things with Ace, Shanks, Whitebeard and Blackbeard which ultimately lead to the Paramount War; and the 5 Elders. All of it was introduced here. Maybe not the exact specifics of what they would eventually become but the ideas certainly were. (Of course, Oda is generally pretty humble in admitting when things really weren't planned: Vivi being a princess? Ace being Roger's son? Law being important at all? lololol)
So why am I mentioning all of this? I'm not necessarily worried about the specifics matching; I'm more interested in what the big picture of the series is and what Oda's intent is while telling the story. The big question is this:
Why does the Skypiea Arc even exist?
There's a bit of worldbuilding with the sky islands; some character progression and events that carry over into Water Seven; some lore about the Roger's travels and the ancient weapons; and also a theme of dreams and adventure that is successfully communicated by the end. But everything else that occurs appears to be completely isolated from the rest of the One Piece world; just as the the world was beginning to open up. Its so out of place that there are some fans that tell people to skip the arc because of how apparently inconsequential it is.
But we know Oda is a very intentional author. So what was his intention for this arc and where does it fit in the grand narrative of One Piece? For pretty much the entire series there was no answer to this other than widespread speculation amongst the fans that Oda hid something important in the arc in regards to the future of the series. But now with the Sun God reveal everything is starting to fall into place. The Skypiea Arc presented:
- a window to an island hundreds of years in the past not conquered by the World Government that was protecting a poneglyph.
- a people who worshipped gods in their own way (still expecting the god to give them salvation) but instead had a protagonist in Noland who was staunchly pro-science so that the readers would automatically discount the ideas of the gods being a real presence in the series.
- a tragic character in Noland who met his end in a way strikingly (deliberately) similar to Roger's execution.
- these wonderful one off scenes of everyone partying backlit by a bonfire with drum sounds playing in the background that we never see anywhere else in the series until the Nika reveal. Acknowledging that this isn't foreshadowing per se but its really weird that there's nothing like this in the entire series.
- A would be god attempting to purge the entire population.
- The first allusions of Luffy being a natural enemy of god. Later on the the entire D clan are said to be the enemies of god.
- Luffy being a saviour god who would let the sun shine. This one didn't make sense until the Nika reveal.
This is already so much here. Even if the specifics aren't matching, the Skypiea Arc is the blueprint for the entire series. I didn't even mention all the other elements of the series that tie together with the Nika reveal such as the series starting with Romance Dawn and Luffy's home being on Dawn Island, the overuse of the Doon sound effect in the manga, all the unique laughs the characters have; Roger laughing at the sight of One Piece and naming the final island Laugh Tale.
I have to ignore all this if I'm to believe that Oda only thought of the Nika reveal/retcon post-timeskip. Its too farfetched. It's like I said earlier: there was no active or direct foreshadowing for the Nika reveal anywhere in the story until Who's Who started running his mouth; it was always passive and indirect.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | *Don't y'all get me started on Ace's tattoo cause Lord knows I will fight you |
Okay, now just hear me out for a minute... ... ...
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | That's the thing though. It's the change in thematic meaning that undermines Luffy's accomplishments and who Luffy is as a character (unless the story subverses the destiny stuff later on, which I'm hopeful it will). |
It doesn't though. The God connection is purely thematic (And I guess a reason for the Looney Tunes aesthetics). Imagine that Luffy had the same power-up and abilities but the fruit name was still the same (minus the visual change), you wouldn't be saying that it undermines Luffy's accomplishments or character.
Everlasting Coconut wrote: | Then why not just leave it at that instead of adding the god layer it? Because this:
"Luffy represents hard-work."
Will always be inherently better than this:
"Luffy represents hard-work. He was also chosen by god and is now god/reincarnation of god" |
Just because Luffy did hard-work, doesn't mean that he represents hard-work; Luffy has never represented hard-work. Also again, not confirmed to be either chosen by god or a reincarnation.
|
Back to top |
|
|
onpufan
Joined: 22 Dec 2022
Posts: 158
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:27 am
|
|
|
I don't really mind the Nika stuff. Honestly it looks a lot better than Gear 4 which I thought was always kind of dumb looking. It does kind of remind me of Chakra Cloak Naruto, and I can understand why people don't like it, but honestly I kind of got used to the change in the series ever since haki was introduced and stuff like armament and conquerers became so common and the series focused less on the devil fruit uniquenesses.
Lossthief wrote: | If there's any predestination here, it's the sense that the Fruit will always find its way to a suitably anti-authoritarian wielder, but everything Luffy has achieved in the series has been through his own development, training, etc - as much as any Devil Fruit user's. |
Can you really call Luffy anti-authoritarian when he's helped restore multiple different monarchies and rulers over the series? I mean, all he did was help Doldo replace Doffy and Cobra replace Crocodile as the rulers of Dressrosa and Alabasta respectively, not turn them into some anarchistic paradise where there's no gods, no masters. Seems like he's fine with authority as long as they're nice people and not mustache twirling villains.
Though I agree with others who say they never really associated Luffy with 'hard work'.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Everlasting Coconut
Joined: 22 Jul 2019
Posts: 316
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:50 am
|
|
|
OH&S wrote: | Seems like a bit of a copout explanation tbh. |
Don't look at me. Tell that to the Digimon Adventure reboot and many other stories like it
Quote: | We can surmise that Joyboy was most likely the previous user of the Awakened Nika fruit in the Void Century. What I'm not convinced of at this stage is if the Sun God is a real entity in the One Piece world or just the dream of those wished for a savior. But this is starting to get into spoiler territory regarding the explanation of Devil Fruits. If he isn't real, then no one chose Luffy unless the original Joyboy was the literal Sun God before the fruit even existed. If its just the fruit that chose him, that's a weak implementation of the Chosen One trope. |
Yeah, this stuff is hard to discuss because there's so much information we still lack. We'll just have to wait and see. The fact that it's a mythical fruit might suggest that Nika is just that, a myth, fiction. But then there's the revelation that the fruit has a mind and will of its own. Whose mind/will? It could easily go either way.
Quote: | I've heard this sentiment before as well. But is it really that big of a deal that some intangible concept of destiny has preordained that someone like Luffy would eventually come? |
In any other story, I would let it slide. But in a story that is specifically about freedom and free will, why even bother introducing such concepts? Also, there is a difference between the world hoping that someone might someday achieve something, and the world waiting specifically for Luffy to achieve something at a specific time in history. The former is fine, the latter is just prophecy, plain and simple.
Quote: |
Why does the Skypiea Arc even exist? |
Easy. Because it's a big adventure. Because that's what pirates search for when they sail into the seas. Because that's a big part of what One Piece is about. Skypiea didn't even need the Poneglyph at the end to justify its existence. All it needed to do was give you a thematically satisfying story and fill you with with a sense of wonder, and it delivered.
So next time you see someone saying that Skypiea can be skipped, tell them that Skypiea is crucial for the story because when Luffy was fighting Eneru to the death, he still remembered to ring the golden bell so that Cricket could hear it down in Jaya. And Cricket heard it. And he cried. And then I cried.
Quote: | Imagine that Luffy had the same power-up and abilities but the fruit name was still the same (minus the visual change), you wouldn't be saying that it undermines Luffy's accomplishments or character. |
A Gear 5 with no prophecies attached to it? No fruits having a mind of their own? Luffy not being a god-coded character? Where do I sign?
Quote: | Just because Luffy did hard-work, doesn't mean that he represents hard-work; Luffy has never represented hard-work. |
Aight, but let me rephrase it then. This:
"Luffy became a great pirate through hard work."
Will always be better than this:
"Luffy became a great pirate through hard work. Although there's also this one prophecy about a great sovereign and everything points to it being Luffy? But there's no confirmation yet so we don't have enough evidence to decisively conclude...."
In all seriousness, I maintain that the reason Oda has been bringing up all this destiny stuff in Wano is because he intends to subvert it later on in order to further drive home the message that One Piece is about free will.
I'll go a step further and give you a better one. I'm going full-on ridiculous: The One Piece will be heavily tied to prophecy and Luffy fulfilling his destiny as Joyboy. Seeing this, Luffy will reject his destiny, he will refuse to claim the One Piece, he will let Buggy take all the glory and become the King of the Pirates, and Luffy will simply go in search of his next adventure. I FEEL IT IN MY BONES and I'm ready to permanently glue a clown wig to my head if it turns out to be wrong.
|
Back to top |
|
|
theotheranimeman
Joined: 19 Nov 2022
Posts: 74
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2023 5:55 pm
|
|
|
NeverConvex wrote: |
theotheranimeman wrote: | When I read comments like this (and there's a lot of them), I can't help but wonder if we've been watching the same anime/reading the same manga. One Piece was visually always just a few steps away from Looney Tunes and that's the main reason some people are reluctant to get into it. |
OP's fights have generally followed very clear principles and not been particularly difficult to follow the mechanics of. I don't mind that many of those principles are downright goofy; what I was more bothered by was that this part of the Kaido fight bordered on incoherent -- it was very difficult to follow the action (in part because of what Gem-Bug said about the extensive use of high-speed blur), both artistically and mechanically. That feeling may dissipate as I become more familiar with how this form works, but that's the specific thing I didn't enjoy overly much about its introduction.
Also, I agree with ECoconut about the thematic issues; or, at least, share their apprehension. Not fond of the apparent shift from Luffy achieving what he has through hard work to his framing as a child of destiny. |
That's fair, the anime version of the fight so far was visually very difficult to follow at parts, that I can agree with. As for the mechanics, well... even in the manga we don't really know the limitations of Gear 5 yet. It seems to operate on cartoon logic, but I'm sure it's going to grounded somehow in the next big Luffy fight.
|
Back to top |
|
|
WatcherZer
Joined: 29 Dec 2016
Posts: 301
|
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 7:25 pm
|
|
|
Couldnt stand the Looney Tunes sound effects and pre-WW2 Steamboat Willy style landscape swaying in time with the characters, really takes you out of the show. Suddenly peoples eyeballs are left behind when they are punched Wile-E-Coyote style? The visual design of Gear 5 I like, for example the way his eyebrows form Son Gokus traditional circlet and referencing him as the monkey king is back to the early days of the show.
As to the argument people are having about when Nika was planned? I think Joy Boy was planned for a long while pre timeskip in relation to the Poneglyphs but the author first consciously started dropping in the Nika sun god mythos aspect of Joy Boy during the Fish Man Island arc with the reintroduction of the Sun Pirates thread and Fisher Tiger backstory, for the first time developing their crew as something beyond a simple 'all fish man pirate crew that Arlong and Jinbe formerly belonged to'.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Davy Sprocket
Joined: 21 Feb 2023
Posts: 31
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 9:28 pm
|
|
|
WatcherZer wrote: | Couldnt stand the Looney Tunes sound effects and pre-WW2 Steamboat Willy style landscape swaying in time with the characters, really takes you out of the show. Suddenly peoples eyeballs are left behind when they are punched Wile-E-Coyote style? The visual design of Gear 5 I like, for example the way his eyebrows form Son Gokus traditional circlet and referencing him as the monkey king is back to the early days of the show. |
Yeah, I can see that. It's different compared to the manga where the anime went above and beyond on that aspect. Although it is kind of in-line with what Oda envisioned. I remember reading an interview how he said he wanted more 'Looney Tunes' style action and antics in the series and felt more series needed to be like that.
I do think I prefer the manga version more and the anime maybe went a bit overboard in that regard...
|
Back to top |
|
|
NeverConvex
Subscriber
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2509
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 9:46 pm
|
|
|
theotheranimeman wrote: | That's fair, the anime version of the fight so far was visually very difficult to follow at parts, that I can agree with. As for the mechanics, well... even in the manga we don't really know the limitations of Gear 5 yet. It seems to operate on cartoon logic, but I'm sure it's going to grounded somehow in the next big Luffy fight. |
I actually warmed up a little bit to Gear 5 in the most recent episode. I thought the continuation of the fight was much more coherent, and appreciated seeing hints of at least one significant limitation to it. There's still clearly a lot being kept hidden about it, but I'm much more comfortable with the narrative only slowly revealing mechanical detail than I am with thinking there just are no principles at all and that fights will generally be an artistic mess with no logic to them (not something I dislike in general, but certainly something I would dislike in One Piece).
Still not super fond, artistically, of the outright bug-out-of-head Wile E. Coyote eyes (maybe in part because I generally found Looney Tunes itself intensely tedious, as a young kid), but so long as the fights return to something principled-ish and generally comprehensible (on a level deeper than a 30-minute DBZ power-up yelling session, I mean), I think I'll probably still enjoy it well enough.
|
Back to top |
|
|
jr240483
Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: New York City,New York,USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 12:55 am
|
|
|
Everlasting Coconut wrote: |
OH&S wrote: | Seems like a bit of a copout explanation tbh. |
Don't look at me. Tell that to the Digimon Adventure reboot and many other stories like it
Quote: | We can surmise that Joyboy was most likely the previous user of the Awakened Nika fruit in the Void Century. What I'm not convinced of at this stage is if the Sun God is a real entity in the One Piece world or just the dream of those wished for a savior. But this is starting to get into spoiler territory regarding the explanation of Devil Fruits. If he isn't real, then no one chose Luffy unless the original Joyboy was the literal Sun God before the fruit even existed. If its just the fruit that chose him, that's a weak implementation of the Chosen One trope. |
Yeah, this stuff is hard to discuss because there's so much information we still lack. We'll just have to wait and see. The fact that it's a mythical fruit might suggest that Nika is just that, a myth, fiction. But then there's the revelation that the fruit has a mind and will of its own. Whose mind/will? It could easily go either way.
Quote: | I've heard this sentiment before as well. But is it really that big of a deal that some intangible concept of destiny has preordained that someone like Luffy would eventually come? |
In any other story, I would let it slide. But in a story that is specifically about freedom and free will, why even bother introducing such concepts? Also, there is a difference between the world hoping that someone might someday achieve something, and the world waiting specifically for Luffy to achieve something at a specific time in history. The former is fine, the latter is just prophecy, plain and simple.
Quote: |
Why does the Skypiea Arc even exist? |
Easy. Because it's a big adventure. Because that's what pirates search for when they sail into the seas. Because that's a big part of what One Piece is about. Skypiea didn't even need the Poneglyph at the end to justify its existence. All it needed to do was give you a thematically satisfying story and fill you with with a sense of wonder, and it delivered.
So next time you see someone saying that Skypiea can be skipped, tell them that Skypiea is crucial for the story because when Luffy was fighting Eneru to the death, he still remembered to ring the golden bell so that Cricket could hear it down in Jaya. And Cricket heard it. And he cried. And then I cried.
Quote: | Imagine that Luffy had the same power-up and abilities but the fruit name was still the same (minus the visual change), you wouldn't be saying that it undermines Luffy's accomplishments or character. |
A Gear 5 with no prophecies attached to it? No fruits having a mind of their own? Luffy not being a god-coded character? Where do I sign?
Quote: | Just because Luffy did hard-work, doesn't mean that he represents hard-work; Luffy has never represented hard-work. |
Aight, but let me rephrase it then. This:
"Luffy became a great pirate through hard work."
Will always be better than this:
"Luffy became a great pirate through hard work. Although there's also this one prophecy about a great sovereign and everything points to it being Luffy? But there's no confirmation yet so we don't have enough evidence to decisively conclude...."
In all seriousness, I maintain that the reason Oda has been bringing up all this destiny stuff in Wano is because he intends to subvert it later on in order to further drive home the message that One Piece is about free will.
I'll go a step further and give you a better one. I'm going full-on ridiculous: The One Piece will be heavily tied to prophecy and Luffy fulfilling his destiny as Joyboy. Seeing this, Luffy will reject his destiny, he will refuse to claim the One Piece, he will let Buggy take all the glory and become the King of the Pirates, and Luffy will simply go in search of his next adventure. I FEEL IT IN MY BONES and I'm ready to permanently glue a clown wig to my head if it turns out to be wrong. |
yea you getter get that glue ready once one piece ends for it is highly unlikely THAT WILL EVER HAPPEN!
|
Back to top |
|
|
jr240483
Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: New York City,New York,USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2023 8:09 am
|
|
|
Davy Sprocket wrote: |
WatcherZer wrote: | Couldnt stand the Looney Tunes sound effects and pre-WW2 Steamboat Willy style landscape swaying in time with the characters, really takes you out of the show. Suddenly peoples eyeballs are left behind when they are punched Wile-E-Coyote style? The visual design of Gear 5 I like, for example the way his eyebrows form Son Gokus traditional circlet and referencing him as the monkey king is back to the early days of the show. |
Yeah, I can see that. It's different compared to the manga where the anime went above and beyond on that aspect. Although it is kind of in-line with what Oda envisioned. I remember reading an interview how he said he wanted more 'Looney Tunes' style action and antics in the series and felt more series needed to be like that.
I do think I prefer the manga version more and the anime maybe went a bit overboard in that regard... |
about thaf theory. while it would make sense, i have a sneaky feeling that oda probably got gear 5 from othet shonen jump characters. specifically gag manga characters.
the way how luffy fights while in gear 5 reminds me way too much on how arale fought against goku during that 30th shonen jump anniversary ep in dragon ball super
|
Back to top |
|
|
|