View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
KH91
Joined: 17 May 2013
Posts: 6176
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:41 pm
|
|
|
~You can't stop the reign. You can't stop the reign, no.~
|
Back to top |
|
|
leafy sea dragon
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 7163
Location: Another Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:44 pm
|
|
|
GeneStriker wrote: | That is the most hilarious misunderstanding of the word 'boycott' I have ever heard of. |
Yeah, do you know about it? The protest was against the existence of Sonic 4, so they announced a boycott and bought Sonic 1 in large quantities.
SEGA, which won either way, had nothing to say.
|
Back to top |
|
|
GeneStriker
Joined: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 156
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:02 pm
|
|
|
leafy sea dragon wrote: | Yeah, do you know about it? The protest was against the existence of Sonic 4, so they announced a boycott and bought Sonic 1 in large quantities.
SEGA, which won either way, had nothing to say. |
First I've heard of it. Thanks for the info.
|
Back to top |
|
|
enurtsol
Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 14886
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:23 pm
|
|
|
Heheheheh, if this continues and enough schools and parents complain, Ellen Baker would find herself out of a job.
(That is, the publisher would just stop using her, and thus she's no longer that appealing to reference.)
|
Back to top |
|
|
TarsTarkas
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5922
Location: Virginia, United States
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:55 pm
|
|
|
If parental complaints about internet content go far enough, the school systems will simply get rid of the text books. Even though the illustrator and publisher have done nothing wrong.
|
Back to top |
|
|
AnimeLordLuis
Joined: 27 Jan 2015
Posts: 1626
Location: The Borderlands of Pandora
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:47 pm
|
|
|
When will people learn the Internet can not be controlled and what goes on the Internet stays on the Internet forever it's sad but this is the world that man has created.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Actar
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 1074
Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:54 am
|
|
|
I completely disagree. While the artist is completely in the right to ask fans to restrain themselves, he shouldn't have to or need to. It is the parent's responsibility to prevent their children from viewing these sorts of pictures in the first place. Just because some people can (and will) sexualize something, doesn't make the original any more inappropriate or worthy of sanction. By this fallacious logic, any kid's programming is unsuitable for kids because of the pornographic fan art. I see this as a relinquishing of parental responsibility.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hameyadea
Joined: 23 Jun 2014
Posts: 3679
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:59 am
|
|
|
Translation: "please stop making erotic and lewd fanpics and dōjinshi."
|
Back to top |
|
|
D00dleB0Y
Joined: 08 May 2015
Posts: 120
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:31 am
|
|
|
She's trending even more than the earthquake, so if that doesn't say anything about her popularity, I don't know what does.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Greed1914
Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 4609
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:41 am
|
|
|
I don't think this should come as much of a surprise to the publisher. The joke that students suddenly want to learn and go to class because of the pretty teacher has been around for a long time. If anything, the statement on the character's creation suggests this was at least part of the motivation behind her design.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Touma
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2651
Location: Colorado, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:04 am
|
|
|
Based solely on what I read in the article it seems to me that they simply made a statement phrased as a polite request to the fan artists, and they did it to show the people who buy and use their textbooks that they are not ignoring the fan art and are not implicitly approving it.
I see nothing tyrannical or unreasonable about it.
I doubt that they expect to stop the drawings, and would not be surprised if they appreciate the potential for publicity, but they had to show their awareness of the situation.
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hayabusa
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 1270
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:28 am
|
|
|
I made a fanart of Ellen with some girls. I hope I do not get sued for this.
|
Back to top |
|
|
leesahlynn
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:38 am
|
|
|
Touma wrote: | I doubt that they expect to stop the drawings, and would not be surprised if they appreciate the potential for publicity, but they had to show their awareness of the situation. |
I interpreted it the same way. They're just covering themselves legally and for PR, this ensures nobody can claim they stood by and endorsed the sexualization of a teacher of whatever complaint the helicopter parent comes up with. I really do not think they actually intend for thousands of fan artists to fill out tens of thousands of permission slips that they then have to sort through.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brutannica
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 257
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 11:34 am
|
|
|
[quote="GeneStriker"]The legal head is basically saying, "We had to say something, so we did. We don't actually care. It happens all the time, after all."
This is pretty much what the writer of the original article concluded.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asterisk-CGY
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 398
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 7:07 pm
|
|
|
There is a precedence set with the e-surance mascot that required them to stop using her because any search of their name brought up porn.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|