View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
Steve Berry
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 522
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 9:04 pm
|
|
|
Whatever. It's not worth discussing anymore. You're very right selenta.
Also, Omar235, you're correct-- you didn't say anything about Mohawk. That was completely my mistake. Apologies there.
Well--
Merry Xmas everyone. Hope the thread gets more interesting again for you.
|
Back to top |
|
|
daxomni
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Somewhere else.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:24 am
|
|
|
selenta wrote: | Also, after having a nearly 4-5 page discussion with you on the basis of the words, it should be fairly obvious to anyone who had read the thread (see the new 1 week ban rule at the top of the freaking page) that loli is not inherently a sexual term unless you misconstrue it as so. |
The only thing that's obvious is that loli fans will often fall back on childish semantics when they can't seem to make their case any other way.
selenta wrote: | This is a personal problem on the part of the misconstruer (somehow, I don't think that's a word), and is not the responsibility of the rest of the world to correct him. If he thinks loli = lolicon hentai in the face of a discussion and rather widespread agreement that the term 'loli' should not refer exclusively to sexualized content, then he's just being stubborn unless he can provide a convincing reason why it is not. |
I'm sorry, but lolita is a sexual term. If you can't admit that it's not my problem.
Here's Microsoft's definition:
Lolita - a young teenage girl regarded or depicted as the object of sexual desire
ANN isn't a school playground where nonsense can masquerade as legitimate discourse. Either rise to the challenge or stop trying to bluff your way through this thread. The time for childishly apologetic diatribes is over.
selenta wrote: | Finally, here is the problem with what Mohawk is saying: Mohawk is looking at goth loli pics and calling some of the pictures 'erotic in an uncomfortable way'. Here's the thing, he seems to be assuming that becuase there are one or two pictures that are showing some skin, it must be some sort of sexual fetish complex. THIS IS WRONG. |
You're criticizing Mohawk for making assumptions while at the same time making assumptions about Mohawk? [clapping]Good show.[/clapping]
selenta wrote: | Every model, for every type of product or every photo shoot does this, I can not think of a single example where any model has EVER deliberately gone for a non-cute or non-sexy pose. Why? Because that is how they are judged to look best. You may argue that there is some aspect of sexuality there, and I can't really disprove that, but find me a model for ANYTHING that doesn't try and play on that card and I'll show you a bad model. You ever see really fat models? Not really. Ever see a model with a nose like an elephant's? Of course not. How about a leper as a model? Ewww... Models are attractive, that's the idea; good looking people just plain get better reactions, this is just something that is true in the world, whether you want to admit it or not. |
This has got to be one of the most poorly conceived points I've ever read on here. It looks like you fell right into the same trap that most other lolicon fans have fallen into; the same trap that Zac pointed out pages ago. You seem to think that if you can just convince the rest of us that lolicon is completely harmless and normal we'll all think there's nothing wrong with you. Forget it; all you've done in this thread is convince me that lolicon fans are even more messed up than I originally thought. The more you guys go on about your views the worse you look. Why can't you seem to understand that?
selenta wrote: | Even if they're not professional models, everybody is well aware of that fact, particularly cosplayers. You can find those pictures as disgusting as you wish to read them as, but to go and assume it's all just some sort of sexual fetish without even trying to understand what is going on... that's pretty ignorant. |
Care to explain why you don't see the mirror image in your own posts? You paint anti-lolicon posts with the same wide brush you claim they paint yours with.
selenta wrote: | You can claim whatever you want all you want, but that doesn't mean it's true or was intended that way. |
That's very true. Maybe it's time to practice what you preach?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lord Kefka
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 96
Location: California..for now
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:40 am
|
|
|
People are fighting about lolis on the day of x-mas. Real cool. Santa isn't going to be happy about this when he comes back next year.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pleroma
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 443
Location: Eromanga island
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:46 am
|
|
|
Quote: | Every model, for every type of product or every photo shoot does this, I can not think of a single example where any model has EVER deliberately gone for a non-cute or non-sexy pose. Why? Because that is how they are judged to look best. You may argue that there is some aspect of sexuality there, and I can't really disprove that, but find me a model for ANYTHING that doesn't try and play on that card and I'll show you a bad model. You ever see really fat models? Not really. Ever see a model with a nose like an elephant's? Of course not. How about a leper as a model? Ewww... Models are attractive, that's the idea; good looking people just plain get better reactions, this is just something that is true in the world, whether you want to admit it or not. |
I just had to comment on this, are you seriously saying that there is nothing sexual about models? The fact that someone is trying to look attractive pretty much makes it so, that people of the same gender can enjoy changes nothing as its still an aesthetic appreciation of something sexual. Mind you sexual doesn't mean everyone has to fap to it, just that its there to create some sort of desire (hence why modeling is associated with advertising.)
I dont see the point of arguing that loli isn't sexual, it certainly doesn't have to have some hardcore erotic appeal, but its there because the audience finds it attractive in some way. A lot of people throw around the art argument, but I have to say, when it comes to representations of people you can't really equate it to enjoying a nice landscape. Sure its there sometimes (I'll be damned if stuff like Takamichi's drawings aren't amazing art) but the core of it all IS about finding in this case drawings of a certain body type appealing. Its the same as enjoying traditional huge boobed or assed ecchi or having a thing for chubby girls. It doesn't make you some hentai fiend but to say the sexual element is entirely absent is ridiculous.
|
Back to top |
|
|
selenta
Subscriber
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1774
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:59 am
|
|
|
... /sigh
I see some people still wish to debate this whole word issue then... I'm sick of it, but I've done a ton of explaining here and the only thing you say back Dax is: "you're stupid and don't know what you're talking about either". Fine then, explain to me why you know better, and while you're at it, I'd like for you to explain to me what the origins of the word "loli" are, what you view as the difference between "loli" and "lolicon" are, and why should loli be regarded as exactly the same word as "lolita" in spite of the word's background and different spelling.
"Loli" may be based off the word "lolita", but I do not see why that inherently means they must mean the same thing and/or be synonymous, not one person has even attempted to make such a logical case here, and yet many seem to claim that position. English already has a word for "lolita" and it's "lolita", not "loli".
EDIT: For Plemorea: No, I'll clarify, I actually was not attempting to say there is no sexual element in modelling, but that there is a sexual element of some sort in all modelling and that the goth loli models don't really do any more than anyone else, so I don't think it's worth mentioning, it's something inherent in the entire process. Also, I disagree if you said people can not even in theory appreciate people the way they appreciate landscapes. I'm not gay (and to be honest, I've even gotten into bed with a gay guy under a situation similar to what happened in American Dad), but looking at a healthy guy's body is really pretty impressive. I don't get turned on the slightest, but I'm still pretty attracted to it; now... that is certainly much more rare when I'm looking at females... but it does happen.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azathrael
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 745
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:21 am
|
|
|
Pleroma wrote: |
I don't see the point of arguing that loli isn't sexual, it certainly doesn't have to have some hardcore erotic appeal, but its there because the audience finds it attractive in some way. A lot of people throw around the art argument, but I have to say, when it comes to representations of people you can't really equate it to enjoying a nice landscape. Sure its there sometimes (I'll be damned if stuff like Takamichi's drawings aren't amazing art) but the core of it all IS about finding in this case drawings of a certain body type appealing. Its the same as enjoying traditional huge boobed or assed ecchi or having a thing for chubby girls. It doesn't make you some hentai fiend but to say the sexual element is entirely absent is ridiculous. |
Agreed. Some people here seem to have some kind of sick, twisted image of loli as simply being a kind of art, which is indeed a "sick, twisted" image that worries me. If nobody has read the wikipedia on lolicon that was mentioned in the thread starter's post, let me quote it:
wikipedia wrote: | The term is borrowed from Japan, where it is a slang portmanteau short for Lolita complex. In Japanese, it refers to an attraction to girls below the age of consent, or an individual attracted to such a person. |
That means that the word "lolicon" has 100% sexual connotations. It has 100% sexual implication. It refers 100% to sexual attraction. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean "lolicon" automatically points to "loli hentai", as there are plenty of lolicon in your-average-anime, but the average person who doesn't know much about anime but knows what lolicon means will believe that lolicon = loli hentai. To think that is a matter of ignorance is ignorance (of not knowing what lolicon truly is) on the part of the person who thinks in that manner. The only difference I see between lolicon-in-your-average-anime and lolicon-in-hentai is that one's implied, while the other is explicitly shown. Either way, lolicon is sexual attraction toward girls below the age of consent.
To address the difference between "loli" and "lolicon", it's pretty obvious that "loli" can either be a short form of "lolita" or an adjective of the noun "lolicon". Either way, does it make much difference?
/Complex:
7. Psychology. a system of interrelated, emotion-charged ideas, feelings, memories, and impulses that is usually repressed and that gives rise to abnormal or pathological behavior.
8. a fixed idea; an obsessive notion.
|
Back to top |
|
|
selenta
Subscriber
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1774
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:54 pm
|
|
|
Azathrael wrote: | Agreed. Some people here seem to have some kind of sick, twisted image of loli as simply being a kind of art, which is indeed a "sick, twisted" image that worries me. If nobody has read the wikipedia on lolicon that was mentioned in the thread starter's post, let me quote it: |
No one was trying to say that I don't think, I clarified my post, but even rereading it I don't see how one could gather that conclusion in light of my statement;
Quote: | You may argue that there is some aspect of sexuality there, and I can't really disprove that, but find me a model for ANYTHING that doesn't try and play on that card and I'll show you a bad model....Models are attractive, that's the idea |
either way, did you even read my edit before posting azathrael?
Azathrael wrote: | That means that the word "lolicon" has 100% sexual connotations. It has 100% sexual implication. It refers 100% to sexual attraction. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean "lolicon" automatically points to "loli hentai", as there are plenty of lolicon in your-average-anime, but the average person who doesn't know much about anime but knows what lolicon means will believe that lolicon = loli hentai. To think that is a matter of ignorance is ignorance (of not knowing what lolicon truly is) on the part of the person who thinks in that manner. The only difference I see between lolicon-in-your-average-anime and lolicon-in-hentai is that one's implied, while the other is explicitly shown. Either way, lolicon is sexual attraction toward girls below the age of consent.
To address the difference between "loli" and "lolicon", it's pretty obvious that "loli" can either be a short form of "lolita" or an adjective of the noun "lolicon". Either way, does it make much difference?
/Complex:
7. Psychology. a system of interrelated, emotion-charged ideas, feelings, memories, and impulses that is usually repressed and that gives rise to abnormal or pathological behavior.
8. a fixed idea; an obsessive notion. |
Yes, actually it does, and that is the point the anti-lolis seem to be glossing over. I'm glad you said that exactly the way you said it because it makes my job eaiser.
Lolicon is the complex of being attracted to lolis. Here's the thing though, loli is NOT just a short form for 'lolita'. I've already said it before, so I won't say it again, but explain to me why my argument that they are not the same is wrong before you go making those accusations. The word lolita was translated into Japanese and the meaning was slightly changed because of the context it was being used in, then it was stolen back into English by anime fans without changing the meaning from the new slightly different Japanese word. The Japanese may have been trying to take the word lolita from English, but when you change the meaning and spelling (if only slightly in both areas), it's not the same word any more.
Lolicon DOES have sexual implications, no one here tried to imply otherwise, that's basically the entire meaning behind it. Lolicon is the con of being attracted to lolis. Why does that inherently make 'loli' a sexual word just because 'lolicon' is? It doesn't! That's the point! This happens all the time in English and Japanese where adding a few letters that have their own meaning can completely change the meaning or focus of the word.
Either way, I and many other people seem to feel that English needs more words to describe the things around us, what is wrong with having two words with different spellings (loli and lolita) have slightly different meanings? It allows us (anime fans) to describe a particular type of character that there is no other word to describe them with; when you or anyone else can offer me up a decent word to replace it, I'll use it. Why must people insist that everything associated with anime and young children be sexually loaded?
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azathrael
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 745
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:05 pm
|
|
|
No, I honestly didn't read your posts. I only read the ones I agreed with and deduced from what was written that there must be people who think lolicon is "just a form of art"(otherwise there wouldn't be posts I'd disagree with, ya?)
I don't care what your personal opinion is, so I won't bother trying to prove or disprove anything you say. My opinion is that "loli" is just a short form of either "lolicon" or "lolita", and that both "lolicon" and "lolita" refer to sexual attraction towards girls below the age of consent. If you find it so disagreeable, feel free to disprove my opinion at your will, but don't cry at me for not caring about your opinion (and it's not like yours is the only important one in this thread) of the word.
To clear my own opinions a bit,
1. Loli is the short form of lolicon or lolita
2. Loli may refer to:
* Lollipop, a hard candy.
* Gothic Lolita, a type of fashion
* Lolita, a novel by Vladimir Nabokov
* Lolicon, a type of adult manga, anime, or computer graphics
* The LOLI (List of LIsts) international chemical regulatory database
3. "Lolicon is a Japanese portmanteau of Lolita complex, a term derived from Vladimir Nabokov's book Lolita." ("The Japanese may have been trying to take the word lolita from English...")
4. "The meaning of lolicon has evolved much in the West (as have the meanings of other words such as anime, otaku and hentai). In the West, lolicon refers to anime or manga that contains sexual or erotic portrayals of prepubescent or childlike characters, and is thus close cognate to the Japanese term lolicon manga.[4] The use of the word lolicon is an indication that the material is overtly—even if not explicitly—erotic."
5. Loli is the short form of lolicon or lolita (just for emphasis)
The words all go in a circle and ties "loli" to "lolicon" or "lolita". It means that if I describe something as "loli", I'm referring to lolicon, which = "lolita complex". Or if I describe something as "loli", I'm referring to lolita, which could be lolicon. In mathematical terms,
loli = lolicon
loli = lolita
lolicon != lolita
/And I thought I sucked at math.
|
Back to top |
|
|
selenta
Subscriber
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1774
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:19 pm
|
|
|
Azathrael wrote: | No, I honestly didn't read your posts. I only read the ones I agreed with and deduced from what was written... |
I think I can rest my case.
*hangs up his hat*
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pleroma
Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 443
Location: Eromanga island
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:18 am
|
|
|
Quote: | Either way, lolicon is sexual attraction toward girls below the age of consent. |
Well, thats not really right. Fort starters many teens are "below age of consent" but would not qualify as loli. I think you should settle on it being an attraction to a body type and maybe a certain innocent personality. I mean can say a flat chested, moe 20 year old be considered loli? How about a very curvaceous, world-weary 12 year old? Do we settle on an attraction to youth in general or to certain stereotypical features of it?
If we go for that definition we could see loli as being the specific youthful aesthetic and not the "OMG kids are hot" fetish that some portray it as.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azathrael
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 745
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:08 am
|
|
|
That's a great point, but it's not within the discussion of this thread. You could make a separate thread for that, but the point I was trying to get across is the sexual attraction part.
As for my very brief opinion of it, some lolicon will get turned down if they find out the true age of the woman (In other words, the age requirement is a must); so the most solid (although not "complete") definition is what you've quoted of me. In addition, that's not my definition, but Wikipedia, where I left out this little part out because I was lazy:
Wikipedia wrote: | an attraction to any girl beneath the age of consent, both perceived and actual pedophilia and ephebophilia. |
Which brings me back to emphasizing that there was a point I was trying to get across and the technical definition is something I didn't really care about analyzing, at least not in this thread.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Redbeard 101
Oscar the Grouch
Forums Superstar
Joined: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 16963
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:33 am
|
|
|
What a nice little flame war this is. It's so nice to see grown men and women bickering like little children. GROW UP. It is very obvious neither side wants to listen to the other. Selenta, you're a smart person so you should see the futility of constantly explaining yourself to people who's head is so far up their butt that they couldn't tell the color of the sky if it fell down on them. Save your breath and your sanity, and simply take to heart you know the difference between the terms loli and lolita.. To all the "loli is the same as lolita" people, get a grip and go take some damn valium. You guys make it seems like a damn crusade you have going on here. They are both seperate terms deal with it or move on. Since it's painfully obvious this thread is well beyond the means of any kind of civil discussion if the mods have any kind of heart in them pleassssseeeeee lock it now and stop this endless, futile debate that will never be resolved.
|
Back to top |
|
|
PantsGoblin
Subscriber
Encyclopedia Editor
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 2969
Location: L.A.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:49 am
|
|
|
psycho 101 wrote: | What a nice little flame war this is. It's so nice to see grown men and women bickering like little children. GROW UP. It is very obvious neither side wants to listen to the other. |
Haha, that is what this topic does to people. I created this thread in hope that we'd be able to have a decent conversation. Apparently it's impossible.
Quote: | Since it's painfully obvious this thread is well beyond the means of any kind of civil discussion if the mods have any kind of heart in them pleassssseeeeee lock it now and stop this endless, futile debate that will never be resolved. |
I tried to get this thread locked over a week ago because people started flaming each other, but people bugged the mods into reopening it. The conversation got a little better after that and I decided to post again... seems it's going back down again though.
Also, I already knew there would be NO closure to this disussion and nothing would be resolved. I mentioned that in my first post. Although, that isn't completely true. After this thread, I have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to have a discussion like this on this forum without flaming.
Oh well, this thread still serves the purpose of confining the evil of this discussion to one thread, and I would like it to stay open on account of that.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azathrael
Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 745
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:00 am
|
|
|
psycho 101 wrote: | What a nice little flame war this is. It's so nice to see grown men and women bickering like little children. GROW UP. It is very obvious neither side wants to listen to the other. Selenta, you're a smart person so you should see the futility of constantly explaining yourself to people who's head is so far up their butt that they couldn't tell the color of the sky if it fell down on them. Save your breath and your sanity, and simply take to heart you know the difference between the terms loli and lolita.. To all the "loli is the same as lolita" people, get a grip and go take some damn valium. You guys make it seems like a damn crusade you have going on here. They are both seperate terms deal with it or move on. Since it's painfully obvious this thread is well beyond the means of any kind of civil discussion if the mods have any kind of heart in them pleassssseeeeee lock it now and stop this endless, futile debate that will never be resolved. |
For the second time, thank you for your kind backseat moderation, sir.
/ㅎㅎ
|
Back to top |
|
|
Iwatch2muchanime
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 1291
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:35 am
|
|
|
Azathrael wrote: |
psycho 101 wrote: | What a nice little flame war this is. It's so nice to see grown men and women bickering like little children. GROW UP. It is very obvious neither side wants to listen to the other. Selenta, you're a smart person so you should see the futility of constantly explaining yourself to people who's head is so far up their butt that they couldn't tell the color of the sky if it fell down on them. Save your breath and your sanity, and simply take to heart you know the difference between the terms loli and lolita.. To all the "loli is the same as lolita" people, get a grip and go take some damn valium. You guys make it seems like a damn crusade you have going on here. They are both seperate terms deal with it or move on. Since it's painfully obvious this thread is well beyond the means of any kind of civil discussion if the mods have any kind of heart in them pleassssseeeeee lock it now and stop this endless, futile debate that will never be resolved. |
For the second time, thank you for your kind backseat moderation, sir.
/ㅎㅎ |
You shouldn't have to say it a second time and just let it go.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|