Forum - View topicNEWS: Japan's Lack of Laws on Virtual Child Porn Criticized
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next Note: this is the discussion thread for this article |
| Author | Message | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tyrenol
Posts: 398 Location: Northern California |
|
|||
You should sign up to work either in the offices of UNICEF or under President Barack Obama. Because you seem to be THE ONLY ONE in this forum whose brain is not completely in the gutter. I'm seeing this happen again: Governmental (or government supported) entities talking about how "this is wrong" and everyone (and their lawyers) going "no it isn't, and we can get proof." I, for one, am sick of it. Here's my question: Where are the people fighting against UNICEF? Why are they all "anonymous," afraid to show their faces and bodies, and are always a feet or two away from kicking distance? Oh yeah; they'll make that argument about the gun-wielding child soldiers in Africa and why UNICEF is not doing much about them. That 6000-yen "Kodomo no Jigan" DVD they just bought (or not) could keep an African child off the streets for two monts. 
Here's my reason: They're visually sickening, mentally broken failures of life you'd warn (your) kids about and not to become. They'd sooner buy "anime girl body pillows" or a CLANNAD DVD before they support anything actually positive, healthy, and meaningful to the rest of the world. And before you fling darts at me: I wasn't happy with the foster children selling bars of candy out at the entrances of grocery stores; said candy melting in the sunlight. I tried to complain against it and had nearly gotten fired from my job. So yeah. 
|
||||
|
||||
Ggultra2764
 Subscriber Posts: 3909 Location: New York state. |
|
|||
|
Yet another case of hypersensitivity from those trying to maintain political correctness in their countries and using anime as a fear tactic to try making themselves feel justified to speak out against the content in anime. As some have already discussed, I'm not gonna be tempted to do the same things that I see with kids or teens from fictional Japanese animated programs. I know enough to discern between reality and fiction.
This has as much absurdity as the mainstream news media and politicians using violent video gamesand controversial pop cultural figures as scapegoats to point blame for the tragedies of Columbine. |
||||
|
||||
|
DmonHiro
|
|
|||
|
All you morons who are defending virtual child pornography are sick bastards who should be............................
If you are one of the people who think like the text above this, then you need to get your head out of your.......pants, and use that energy for something USEFULL. Worry about the REAL child pornography, where REAL children are abused. Who the hell cares that X is reading a loli-porn manga and je*&^%ing off? Is he harming anyone? You ACTUALLY think that if I, or anyone else, reads a loli rape manga, is going to go out on the streets looking for victims? GET REAL! These ass*&^* are just trying to justyfy their paychecks by doing something easy, that does not actually need a lot of work. Go hel some real children, you lazy POS from UNICEF. THEN, after you've rid the world of real child pron, do you even have THE RIGHT to mention virtual child porn. THIS is why I don't donate. Because I KNOW my money would NOT be spent helping children. It would just go in the bottomless pockets of people who are only interested in money. |
||||
cetriya
 Posts: 156 Location: NJ |
|
|||
As much as I dislike fake child porn being available, there is only so much resources to enforce laws. Also, I'd like those loli idols to be gone and other openly stated child porn in countries like haiti, brazil, ect Last edited by cetriya on Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
||||
|
||||
|
IDACORASKA
Posts: 6 Location: Metro Denver, Colorado |
|
|||
|
I am glad to live in a nation that allows anyone to express themselves anyway they want, but WE ALL MUST be carefull & respectful to those who do not share our opnions. Also WE ALL MUST BE WILLING to STAND-UP, & PROTECT BY PEACEFUL MEANS IF POSSABLE these rights that are stated by BOTH The U.S. CONSTUTION & The BILL OF RIGHTS!!!!!
|
||||
|
||||
hikaru004
 Posts: 2306 |
|
|||
Uh. which country would that be? Even the US has limits. |
||||
|
||||
omegaviper
 Posts: 4 Location: Vermont, USA |
|
|||
|
i don't think they should do anything about either version of this, because then it will be harder to obtane.
|
||||
|
||||
|
DmonHiro
|
|
|||
...pardon me? now I know I didn't read that right, cause you just said that they should leave virtual AND REAL child porn alone, so it's easyer to find. I agree an the virtual one man, but real child porn needs to dissapear FOREVER. |
||||
Mohawk52
 Posts: 8202 Location: England, UK |
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Dargonxtc
 Posts: 4463 Location: Nc5xd7+ スターダストの海洋 |
|
|||
First I would like to commend you on providing something, whereas most would provide nothing. I would also like to say that yeah, I do see the fine line with which this walks, but it is also important not to have knee-jerk reactions and to actually think about this. And that goes for both sides. The price of being wrong is also great, for both sides. That is not to say I don't have problems with using this study in this circumstance.
|
||||
|
||||
angel_lover
 Posts: 645 Location: UK |
|
|||
I think that if you're convicted of participation in the sexual abuse of real children in any way, shape or form, then it shouldn't make any difference what you do or don't have in your home, you should go down and stay down - an automatic life sentence would be entirely appropriate, because that's what you've already given to the child you abused. But on the other hand, if you've never touched a real child, never tried to groom one, never chatted one up online by pretending to be another kid, never participated in any way, either as a supplier or consumer, of actual child pornography, erotica or anything that could conceivably have involved a real child in something that he or she did not fully understand or might have regretted when they were older and wiser, then it's nobody's business at all, not even UNICEF's, what you possess in the privacy of your own home. |
||||
|
||||
|
Joichiro Nishi
Posts: 163 |
|
|||
|
Lolicon is just not cool; it's sick and tasteless. If you like to watch little girls in sexual scenes, you are a pedophile; even if you only watch drawing little girls. Freedom implied respect for other people's rights.
|
||||
|
||||
|
angel_lover
Posts: 645 Location: UK |
|
|||
Please explain whose rights I have infringed by looking at a drawing. Please also explain why your personal tastes should be the standard for public morality and legislation. Last edited by angel_lover on Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:50 pm; edited 2 times in total |
||||
|
||||
penguintruth
 Posts: 8468 Location: Penguinopolis |
|
|||
Whose rights are lewd drawings of imaginery people infringing upon? The fictional children on the paper? |
||||
|
||||
|
Joichiro Nishi
Posts: 163 |
|
|||
What about if I make a comic about black people getting slapped, tortured, mutilated and raped by the KKK? I guess that would be totally cool for you because they are fictional characters. |
||||
|
||||
 |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group