View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
|
GATSU
Joined: 03 Jan 2002
Posts: 15572
|
Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 7:38 pm
|
|
|
Me thinks someone either bootlegged Cutie Honey, in order
to review it, or a company got the N. American rights, and gave ANN a preview, but can't be disclosed right now. Anyway, I was interested, til I heard it was only 90 minutes.
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempest
I Run this place.
ANN Publisher
Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 10460
Location: Do not message me for support.
|
Posted: Fri May 28, 2004 8:32 pm
|
|
|
90 minutes was just a "top of my head" number to say "feature length movie"...
In restrospect it was a bad choice and I'll go change it.
I can't remember how long the movie actually is.
|
Back to top |
|
|
thecactusman17
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 167
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 10:25 pm
|
|
|
You may disagree, but I personally say that it is not in any way difficult to be better than the live action Sailor Moon--be the film campy or otherwise.
|
Back to top |
|
|
littlegreenwolf
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 4796
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 10:35 pm
|
|
|
thecactusman17 wrote: | You may disagree, but I personally say that it is not in any way difficult to be better than the live action Sailor Moon--be the film campy or otherwise. |
It's just about as easy as something like spiderman kicking the butt of of little ole mighty morphin power rangers. In quality. Except Spiderman had a good story, Cutie Honey is... meh. It's Cutie Honey. Sailormoon or Cutie Honey, which has the better story? My money is on Sailormoon, even with all the corn.
Again, I really don't see where people can get off comparing a sentai show, which usually doesn't have a great budget, to a made for theaters movie.
|
Back to top |
|
|
thecactusman17
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 167
|
Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 10:59 pm
|
|
|
Did I? I was merely responding to a comparison made in the review. Sorry if that was unclear.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|